cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andri Putra Kesmawan
Contact Email
andriputrakesmawan@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
igpa@ugm.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 08529213     EISSN : 24774693     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Public Health Social Sciences
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publikasi), dengan nomor p-ISSN: 0852-9213, e-ISSN: 2477-4693, adalah jurnal multidisiplin berskala nasional yang mencakup berbagai pokok persoalan dalam kajian ilmu-ilmu administrasi publik. Secara khusus JKAP menaruh perhatian pada pokok-pokok persoalan tentang perkembangan ilmu kebijakan dan administrasi publik, administrasi pembangunan, otonomi daerah, birokrasi dan aparatur negara, desentralisasi, ilmu ekonomi dan studi pembangunan, manajemen publik, kebijakan dan pemerintahan, serta ilmu sosial lain mencakup ilmu kesehatan masyarakat, politik fiskal, dan perencanaan wilayah.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997" : 12 Documents clear
Peningkatan Peran Serta Masyarakat dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Daerah Baswir, Revrisond
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (125.762 KB)

Abstract

As national government budget will be more depended upon tax levy, local development finance would virtually be determined by public contribution. The problem of balancing financial allocation between central and local government, therefore, is the problem of shifting people’s fund contribution from central government to the local government. Likewise, by delegating policies to local government for collecting the public fund, people participation in local development finance will be enhanced. It might contrasts to common analysis that there is no significant relationship between local autonomy policy and central-local finance sharing or much analysis which concentrate more on Second Stage Local Governments (Pemda Tingkat II) struggle to increase their local revenue. There are some potential alternatives to improve people participation in local development; First, enhance Local Planning Board (Bappeda Tingkat II) capability to formulate development plans. Overall reformation is needed to development planning mechanisms in each stages of government administration. Second, shift or modify the central-local development finance systems so that there will be more leeway for local government to finance development based on their priorities. Third, give more power to local legislative council (DPRD) to control local executives (Gubernur and Bupati) so that local executives will be responsible much more to the local people rather than to the central government. Conclusively, all efforts to enhance people participation is very closely related to local autonomy improvement and parallel to this is national democracy improvement.
Implementasi Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah Tingkat II Masa Orde Baru Utomo, Warsito
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Act No. 5 of 1974 on the Principles of Administration in Indonesian Local Government stipulates fundamental effort for decentralization – or more commonly known as local autonomy. This analysis shows, however, that insofar the implementation of the government act encourages more centralization instead of decentralization. It means that the Central Government has been dominantly rules nearly all aspects of local government during the New Order period. It is obvious that the implementation of decentralization policy or local autonomy is mostly determined by the existing political system and structure. On the Second Stage of local (Daerah Tingkat II), there are various local or internal factors which appears to be very influential for the effectiveness of such policy implementation. A descriptive analysis of the two Second Stage of local governments (Cilacap and Kudus) indicates there are significant policy implementation differences. The very fact that there are local condition differences, specific handicaps confronted by local government, and some variance in human resources capability implies that the idea of uniformity in most of administrative procedure might not favourable for the future of decentralization and local outonomy policy. This is particularly important if we analyze all aspects related to such policy implementation. The above things do get sufficient attention in nearly all of this paper.
Keuangan Negara: Reformulasi Kriteria Proyek Dalam Rangka Klasifikasi Anggaran Pengeluaran Nugroho, Bambang
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (500.387 KB)

Abstract

A distinctive classification should be applied to government budget, particularly between budget allocation for consumption and for investment. This is important for policy makers so that they will be able to forecast investment and consumption effects on economic growth and inflation. In Indonesian budget system, unclear criteria to distinguish routine and development budget also creates many problematic situations in managing public finance. This article offers some alternatives to solve the problem. One simple solution is to reformulate what is the so-called projects. Projects are an activity or a group of activities which has certain goals and objectives, attains to result new physical or non-physical assets in the form of goods, services or capability improvements. Those activities are managed whithin certain span of time and amount of fund. Instead of consumptions, projects are primarily investments. If this alternative is implemented consistently in the budget allocation systems, it may decrease the figure of government saving and number of Project List Proposal (Daftar Isian Proyek - DIP), which may not be favorable for implementors who have vested interest. By doing so, however, overlapped activities which are funded by routine and development budget can be avoided substantially. Government accounting system would be more efficient because every projects should be resulted in investment. A more radical approach is to invalidate the distinction between routine and development (non-routine) budget allocation by all means. Productivity and accountability would be the main criteria for all forms of the government fund allocation. There should be a fundamental change in the government budget cycle. Government saving should be formulated into: the subtraction between domestic revenue and additional finance (belanja penunjang), and T-account system in the government budget (APBN) should be substantially modified. Finally, all of these remedies depend on effort to distinguish clearly between routine and project criteria through a transparent definition and vision of those who manage the budget allocation system.
Pemerintah yang Efisien, Tanggap, dan Akuntabel Dwiyanto, Agus
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (176.935 KB)

Abstract

Current issues which reflecting the difficulties in establishing efficient, responsive and accountable government are partly because of too much orientation on economic development while neglecting administrative and political reformation. Lack of attention to administrative and political reformation which create the so-called ‘administrative state’ has brought about bureaucratic pathology and practical collusive and corrupt behaviors. Power and authority, which concentrated within the public bureaucracy have also obstruct people political capability to control the government. This article offers cultivation of bureaucrat ethics as a strategy to create an efficient, responsive, and accountable government. Bureaucrat ethics could be a fundamental code for public bureaucrats so that they would be able to make policies which in response to public interest and people’s original values. Only if this public ethics is institutionalized then bureaucrats would have a good guidance in applying discretionary power, even when political control and regulation are no longer effective.
Kebijakan Otomotif di Indonesia 1966-1996: Memahami Konteks Politik Proses Lahirnya Kebijakan Publik Purwanto, Erwan Agus
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (284.155 KB)

Abstract

Automotive industrialization is the most relevant topic for discus to understand the development of industrialization in Indonesia. Because, automotive industry has specific character as representation of Indonesian strategy that is sensitive influenced by political factors. Many interests and missions have to accommodate in automotive industry have made automotive industry become dynamic and uncertain sector to be influenced. This research intended to understand the dynamic changing of automotive policies among 1966-1996, that are contains many controversial policies, with policy study approach. This approach does to answer the research question: how political contect will affect policy making process in Indonesian automotive policies. The research analysis focused on the understanding of factors interaction in policy making process by observing the patterns of the interaction among the government, business man, political and economical enviroment. Based on the research result, political context of automotive policies among period 1966-1996 was influenced by strong patronage in the Indonesian automotive policy making process because the interest in: nativism, foreign capital pressure, and nepotism.
Menuju Pembangunan Partisipatif (bagaimana Mendayagunakan Kebudayaan Lokal) Abdullah, Irwan
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik (MAP) FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (183.7 KB)

Abstract

Grassroot people are development actors who determine course of development so that it will bring about a more valuable change. That is the basic argument as why people autonomy and participation are the keywords for the development achievement. Research and experience showed that development programs and projects failures are usually because lack of people participation. This article is based on the assumption that local culture and local participation should become the guidance for policies and on-going development processes. To improve people participation in development, local culture should be strengthened by : (1) utilizing local social and cultural institutions, (2) ecudating local people, and (3) creating participationâ culture. Development ideas tend to be more implementable if they can be enculturized through traditional institutions such as indigeneous ceremony and religious rituals. People participation can be encouraged through the established institutions so that there is no need to create specific institution to serve government interests. Intensive people education which aimed at renewing peoples ideas and knowledge would be more effective to change their apprehension for development. In this important effort , there should also perspective change among bureaucrats. Then, participative culture in all variety should be appreciated and cultivated by giving incentives and rewards for individuals, groups and institutions. As such, development moral should be in accordance with the people moral.
Pemerintah yang Efisien, Tanggap, dan Akuntabel Agus Dwiyanto
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (176.935 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8516

Abstract

Current issues which reflecting the difficulties in establishing efficient, responsive and accountable government are partly because of too much orientation on economic development while neglecting administrative and political reformation. Lack of attention to administrative and political reformation which create the so-called ‘administrative state’ has brought about bureaucratic pathology and practical collusive and corrupt behaviors. Power and authority, which concentrated within the public bureaucracy have also obstruct people political capability to control the government. This article offers cultivation of bureaucrat ethics as a strategy to create an efficient, responsive, and accountable government. Bureaucrat ethics could be a fundamental code for public bureaucrats so that they would be able to make policies which in response to public interest and people’s original values. Only if this public ethics is institutionalized then bureaucrats would have a good guidance in applying discretionary power, even when political control and regulation are no longer effective.
Menuju Pembangunan Partisipatif (bagaimana Mendayagunakan Kebudayaan Lokal) Irwan Abdullah
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (183.7 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8517

Abstract

Grassroot people are development actors who determine course of development so that it will bring about a more valuable change. That is the basic argument as why people autonomy and participation are the keywords for the development achievement. Research and experience showed that development programs and projects failures are usually because lack of people participation. This article is based on the assumption that local culture and local participation should become the guidance for policies and on-going development processes. To improve people participation in development, local culture should be strengthened by : (1) utilizing local social and cultural institutions, (2) ecudating local people, and (3) creating participationâ culture. Development ideas tend to be more implementable if they can be enculturized through traditional institutions such as indigeneous ceremony and religious rituals. People participation can be encouraged through the established institutions so that there is no need to create specific institution to serve government interests. Intensive people education which aimed at renewing people's ideas and knowledge would be more effective to change their apprehension for development. In this important effort , there should also perspective change among bureaucrats. Then, participative culture in all variety should be appreciated and cultivated by giving incentives and rewards for individuals, groups and institutions. As such, development moral should be in accordance with the people moral.
Peningkatan Peran Serta Masyarakat dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Daerah Revrisond Baswir
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (125.762 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8518

Abstract

As national government budget will be more depended upon tax levy, local development finance would virtually be determined by public contribution. The problem of balancing financial allocation between central and local government, therefore, is the problem of shifting people’s fund contribution from central government to the local government. Likewise, by delegating policies to local government for collecting the public fund, people participation in local development finance will be enhanced. It might contrasts to common analysis that there is no significant relationship between local autonomy policy and central-local finance sharing or much analysis which concentrate more on Second Stage Local Governments (Pemda Tingkat II) struggle to increase their local revenue. There are some potential alternatives to improve people participation in local development; First, enhance Local Planning Board (Bappeda Tingkat II) capability to formulate development plans. Overall reformation is needed to development planning mechanisms in each stages of government administration. Second, shift or modify the central-local development finance systems so that there will be more leeway for local government to finance development based on their priorities. Third, give more power to local legislative council (DPRD) to control local executives (Gubernur and Bupati) so that local executives will be responsible much more to the local people rather than to the central government. Conclusively, all efforts to enhance people participation is very closely related to local autonomy improvement and parallel to this is national democracy improvement.
Implementasi Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah Tingkat II Masa Orde Baru Warsito Utomo
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997
Publisher : Magister Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.8519

Abstract

Act No. 5 of 1974 on the Principles of Administration in Indonesian Local Government stipulates fundamental effort for decentralization – or more commonly known as local autonomy. This analysis shows, however, that insofar the implementation of the government act encourages more centralization instead of decentralization. It means that the Central Government has been dominantly rules nearly all aspects of local government during the New Order period. It is obvious that the implementation of decentralization policy or local autonomy is mostly determined by the existing political system and structure. On the Second Stage of local (Daerah Tingkat II), there are various local or internal factors which appears to be very influential for the effectiveness of such policy implementation. A descriptive analysis of the two Second Stage of local governments (Cilacap and Kudus) indicates there are significant policy implementation differences. The very fact that there are local condition differences, specific handicaps confronted by local government, and some variance in human resources capability implies that the idea of uniformity in most of administrative procedure might not favourable for the future of decentralization and local outonomy policy. This is particularly important if we analyze all aspects related to such policy implementation. The above things do get sufficient attention in nearly all of this paper.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

1997 1997


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 29, No 2 (2025): November Vol 29, No 1 (2025): May Vol 28, No 1 (2024): May 2024 Vol 28, No 2 (2024): November Vol 27, No 2 (2023): November Vol 27, No 1 (2023): May Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May 2022 Vol 26, No 2 (2022): November Vol 26, No 1 (2022): May Vol 25, No 1 (2021): May, 2021 Vol 25, No 2 (2021): November Vol 24, No 2 (2020): November Vol 24, No 1 (2020): May Vol 23, No 2 (2019): November Vol 23, No 1 (2019): May Vol 22, No 2 (2018): November Vol 22, No 1 (2018): May Vol 21, No 2 (2017): November Vol 21, No 1 (2017): May Vol 20, No 2 (2016): November Vol 20, No 1 (2016): May 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2015 2015: JKAP Volume 19 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2015 Vol 19, No 2 (2015): November Vol 19, No 1 (2015): May 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 2, November Tahun 2014 2014: JKAP Volume 18 Nomor 1, Mei Tahun 2014 Vol 18, No 2 (2014): November Vol 18, No 1 (2014): May 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 2, Tahun 2013 2013: JKAP Volume 17 Nomor 1, Tahun 2013 Vol 17, No 2 (2013): November Vol 17, No 1 (2013): May 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2012 2012: JKAP VOLUME 16 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2012 Vol 16, No 2 (2012): November Vol 16, No 1 (2012): May 2011: JKAP VOLUME 15 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2011 Vol 15, No 1 (2011): May 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2010 2010: JKAP VOLUME 14 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2010 Vol 14, No 2 (2010): November Vol 14, No 1 (2010): May 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2009 2009: JKAP VOLUME 13 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2009 Vol 13, No 2 (2009): November Vol 13, No 1 (2009): May 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 2008: JKAP VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2008 Vol 12, No 2 (2008): November Vol 12, No 1 (2008): May 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2007: JKAP VOLUME 11 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2007 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2006: JKAP VOLUME 10 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2006 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2005: JKAP VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2005 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2004: JKAP VOLUME 8 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2004 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2003: JKAP VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2003 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2002: JKAP VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2002 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2001: JKAP VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2001 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 2000: JKAP VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 2000 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1999: JKAP VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1999 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1998: JKAP VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1998 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1997: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, TAHUN 1997 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 1996: JKAP VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1, TAHUN 1996 More Issue