cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. bantul,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Media Hukum
ISSN : 08548919     EISSN : 25031023     DOI : 10.18196/jmh
Core Subject : Social,
MEDIA HUKUM (JMH) (ISSN:0854-8919, E-ISSN:2503-1023) is journal published by Faculty of Law Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. JMH publishes scientific articles that related in law, development and harmonization of Shariah and positive law in Indonesia. JMH are published twice a year, in June and December. Articles are written in English or Bahasa Indonesia and reviewed by competence reviewers.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 19 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December" : 19 Documents clear
INKONSISTENSI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MEMBATALKAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE Widowaty, Yeni; Fitriyanti, Fadia
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0081.209-217

Abstract

This research has 3 aims, the first is to examines the consideration of the Supreme Court in deciding the cancellation of arbitration decision under Article 70 and beyond Article 70 of Arbitration Act, the second is to review and analyze theories used in the consideration of the Supreme Court to cancel the Arbitration Decision. The third is to formulate concept in deciding the cancellation of Arbitration based on the principle of justice. This type of research is normative judicial research. Approach used in this research is case study approach. In more detail of the data obtained, processed and analyzed and presented in descriptive qualitative. The result of the research is divided into several parts, the first shows that according to the consideration of Deision of Supreme Court No.729/K/Pdt.Sus/2008 see Article 70 of the Arbitrase Act is limitative, different with Supreme Court Decision No.03/Arb/BTU of 2005 interpeting Article is enunciatif. The second, the Great Judge who cancel the arbitrase decision according to Article 70 Arbitration Act which is limitative by using Analytical theory. the Great Judge cancel the arbitrase decision refers to reasons beyond Article 70 of Rbitrase Act using Progressive Law theory. The third, according to procedural fairness the reason for cancellation is based on decision Article No.70 Arbitrase Act is too limitative comparing to Article 34 of the UNICITRAL Model Law. This substantive justice should be limited to the signs, so that arbitrators use it arbitrarily.
DAMPAK PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 365 K/Pid 2012 TERHADAP KINERJA DOKTER DI WILAYAH III CIREBON Sutrisno, Endang; Kusuma Dewi, Elya
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0077.162-170

Abstract

Perwujudan hukum yang benar harus saling melengkapi dan tidak saling mengecualikan hakikat dari hukum terletak pada karakteristik dari hukumnya sebagai institusi yang menunjang dan melindungi nilai-nilai, hingga eksistensi hukum harus mampu memberikan perwujudan nilai-nilai menjadi kenyataan dan perwujudan tersebut teraplikasikan dalam proses bekerjanya hukum. Norma hukum yang mengatur dokter yaitu Undang-Undang No.29 tahun 2004 tentang Praktek Kedokteran memberikan suatu pendefinisian secara tegas mengenai standar profesi, yaitu batasan kemampuan (knowledge, sklill and profesional attitude) minimal yang harus dikuasai oleh seorang individu untuk dapat melakukan kegiatan profesionalnya pada masyarakat secara mandiri yang dibuat oleh organisasi profesi. Untuk itu, dalam menjalankan profesi dokter harus berdasarkan pada ketentuan norma tersebut sebab dokter dituntut pertanggungjawaban dalam menjalankan profesinya, bilamana terjadi hal-hal yang disebabkan oleh kelalaian dan kesalahannya dapat menimbulkan pertanggungjawaban hukum sehingga dituntut adanya proses hukum yang dapat berakibat administratif, perdata atau pidana, putusan pengadilan yang dapat menentukan hal ini. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 365 K/Pid 2012, salah satu bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum yang harus dibebankan sebagai bentuk perwujudan dokter dalam menjalan profesinya, sekalipun pada akhirnya dengan putusan tersebut dapat berdampak pada kinerja dokter.
KESALAHAN PROFESIONAL DOKTER DAN PUTUSAN HAKIM: DILEMA DALAM PELAYANAN MEDIS Seran, Marcel
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0082.218-228

Abstract

The relationship between the doctor-patient is a very unique law. The uniqueness of this legal relationship beside based on the law; the element of trust is becoming a cornerstone of the creation of the medical practitioners’ acts of effort on the patient, so that the ethical and moral aspects are involved in it. As a cornerstone of patient-doctor relationship, it is built upon trust; it is not an option of the way the medical dispute resolution between doctor-patient but as a must. But in fact, it is not the case, since it is not uncommon for the court becomes the choice of the medical dispute settlement. There would be a reaction from among the medical profession. They assess that the law interferes too far with the autonomy of the medical profession. To overcome this problem then it is offered medical dispute solutions through the judicial profession; there is a need to involve medical profession as a member of the judges. So there is no longer an accusation that the public court judge does not understand the medical issues. In that way, the medical dispute resolution can be achieved.
Institutions and Mechanisms for Internal Conflict Resolution: Legal and Non-Legal Means in Resolving Dispute and Attaining Justice in Malaysia Azmin Mokhtar, Khairil
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Seeking justice is a noble cause and dispensing justice is an obligation that the state must fulfill. Under the doctrine of separation of powers courts exist to protect people and their rights, to guarantee fairness and justice for all. The task to combat injustices, produce a just ordering of society, ensure a fair distribution of material and legal resources, safeguard the rule of law, promote equality, ensure proportionality in punishment, and protect entitlements and legitimate expectations should not be put on the shoulders of judges and courts only. It must be spread out and shared by other institutions and by whatever means available
MEKANISME PENENTUAN NILAI APPRAISAL DAN PENGIKATAN HAK CIPTA SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA Budi Setianingrum, Reni
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0083.229-238

Abstract

Act number 28 of 2014 on Copyright regulates that the Copyright as a movable intangible objects can be used as fiduciary transfer of ownership. Provisions regarding Copyright as the object of fiduciary transfer of oiwnership will be implemented in accordance with the provisions of the legislation applied. But practically, it is still being debated, both from the holders of copyright, as well as banks and Notaries as the official maker of the Deed of Fiduciary because there is no implementing regulations are clear, so recently there is no party that provides credit with collateral in the form Copyright. This research aims to study the binding mechanism of Copyright as fiduciary transfer of ownership’s object in lending in terms of readiness of the Appraisal authority to determine the economic value of the collateral. This type of research is normative juridical research.
SUMBANGAN PEMIKIRAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA TERHADAP PEMBAHARUAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA(KUHAP) Wibowo, Ari
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0074.128-136

Abstract

The idea of renewal of the Criminal Procedure Code can not be separated from the contribution of human rights concept. This contribution has been explicitly included in the preamble of the Draft of Criminal Procedure Code. Although the current Criminal Procedure Code already provides protection to the rights of the defendant, but the implementation is still not optimal. Therefore, in the Draft of Criminal Procedure Code there is a new institution called the Rechter-Commissaris to replace the function of Pretrial Institutions. It has far wider powers of Pretrial Institution, so that the protection of the rights of defendant in any stage of the judicial process will be more secure fulfillment. The development of human rights concept also contributed to the idea to regulate the rights of victims, both associated with involvement in all stages of judicial proceedings and the right to sue for damages.
Hubungan Antara Pusat dan Daerah Dalam Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Nur Wijayanti, Septi
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0079.186-199

Abstract

Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah yang diundangkan pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2014 merubah wajah hubungan Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah. Secara hukum maka Undang-undang  nomor 32 tahun 2004 dinyatakan sudah tidak berlaku lagi, dan dalam masa 2 (dua) tahun kedepan seluruh perubahan dan peraturan pelaksanaan  yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang nomor 23 tahun 2014 harus ditetapkan. Otonomi daerah yang dijalankan selama ini semata-mata hanya dipahami sebagai perpindahan kewajiban pemerintah pusat kepada pemerintah daerah untuk masyarakat. Padahal substansi penting dari otonomi daerah adalah pelimpahan kewenangan dari pusat ke daerah secara politik dan ekonomi agar pembangunan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi berlangsung secara adil dan merata di daerah. Makalah ini membahas tentang  konsep otonomi daerah dalam kerangka Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia  yang ditekankan lebih tajam dalam Undang-Undang nomor 23 tahun 2014. Perubahan yang mendasar lain yang tidak ada dalam Undang-Undang nomor 32 tahun 2004 ialah ditetapkannya Urusan Wajib Daerah, dan pola hubungan Urusan Konkuren antara Pemerintah Pusat, Provinsi dan Kabupaten/ Kota yang langsung dimasukkan dalam Lampiran Undang-Undang nomor 23 tahun 2014 bahwa klasifikasi urusan Pemerintahan terdiri atas urusan pemerintahan absolut, urusan pemerintahan konkuren, dan urusan pemerintahan umum
HAK PREROGATIF PRESIDEN DALAM PENGANGKATAN DAN PEMBERHENTIAN KEPALA KEPOLISIAN NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UUD 1945 Kaharudin, Kaharudin; Galang Asmara, HM; Minollah, Minollah; Jayadi, Haeruman
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0075.137-149

Abstract

The research was intended to determine the prerogative of the President on the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945, and to know the prerogative of the President in the appointment and dismissal of the Head of the Indonesian National Police, so as to prevent conflicts between the president and parliament in the appointment and dismissal of the police chief. The research method used is normative law research method with the statute approach and the conceptual approach. Through statute approach, researchers will conduct in-depth study of the article of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945, and the Act on the prerogative of the President in the appointment and dismissal of the police chief. While the conceptual approach, researchers will study the concepts of the thinking of experts in Constitutional Law related to the prerogative of the President in the appointment and dismissal of the police chief. The results showed that the prerogative of the President in the appointment and dismissal of the Chief of Police is restricted by the requirement for approval of the House of Representatives as a form of checks and balances between state institutions. This is a form of control of the House of Representatives as a representative of all the people of Indonesia who have sovereignty under the Constitution of 1945.
REVITALISASI PRINSIP PEMBEDAAN (DISTINCTION PRINCIPLE) SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN KORBAN KONFLIK DALAM KONFLIK BERSENJATA MODERN Danial, Danial
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0080.200-208

Abstract

Studi ini dimaksudkan untuk mengkaji revitalisasi prinsip pembedaan dalam hukum humaniter internasional agar dapat memberikan perlindungan efektif terhadap kombatan dan penduduk sipil dalam konflik bersenjata modern. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif,dengan pendekatan asas-asas hukum dan sejarah hukum. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis, yaitu menganalisis identifikasi masalah berdasarkan data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tertier yang kemudian dianalisis secara yuridis kualitatif. Studi ini mengkaji revitalisasi revitalisasi konsep prinsip pembedaan hukum humaniter internasional dapat memberikan perlindungan efektif terhadap kombatan dan penduduk sipil jika pihak yang bersengketa menghormati prinsip pembedaan, prinsip proporsionaltas dan prinsip kemanusiaan dalam konflik bersenjata secara bersamaan. Selain itu, pembaharuan terhadap Hukum Humaniter Internasional dalam upaya perlindungan korban konflik bersenjata perlu di lakukan karena pada tataran konsep dan implementasi kurang memberikan perlindungan efektif terhadap kombatan dan penduduk sipil dalam konflik bersenjata modern. Hal tersebut karena dipengaruhi perkembangan bentuk konflik, yang tadinya hanya konflik bersenjata internasional kemudian muncul konflik bersenjata non internasional; adanya perbedaan norma antara Protokol Tambahan I dan II tahun 1977; dan adanya perbedaan penafsiran terhadap objek; serta Sulitnya membedakan antara kombatan dan non kombatan dalam perang modern saat ini.
EKSISTENSI SERIKAT PEKERJA/SERIKAT BURUH DALAM UPAYA MENSEJAHTERAKAN PEKERJA Ibrahim, Zulkarnain
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 23, No 2 (2016): December
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2016.0076.150-161

Abstract

The exsistence of Labour Union do not implement the mandate of Laws. No. 21 year 2000 about Labour Union, also in covering, defensing the right/obligation of workers, and welfare of workers and their family. Informal workers not yet and should become the member of Labour Union, because they become the Indonesia’s economic strength/endurance. So that Labour Union convince goverment to help with technical guidance, management, and banking with low interest. General obstacle of Labour Union, weak in leadership’s quality and bargaining with businessmen. The personal/group needs, become the reason of fragmentation from time to time, and the vision/mission has not yet maximally executed to facing the future. The Labour Union should execute right/obligation from laws, making the members become professional in their fields, and harmonic with members and also bussinesmen.

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 19