Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I)
Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I) adalah jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Jurnal ini bertujuan untuk memfasilitasi interaksi, diskusi, dan gagasan di antara para ilmuwan psikologi Indonesia. Jurnal ini difokuskan pada Psikologi Pengukuran.
Articles
12 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I"
:
12 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Construct Validity and Reliability Testing of Perceived Job Stress as an Academic Leader (PJSAL) Instrument ]]>
<![CDATA[Immanuel Yosua]]>;
<![CDATA[Hana Panggabean]]>
<![CDATA[ JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.19504
<![CDATA[This study aims to develop the Perceived Job Stress as an Academic Leader (PJSAL) instrument based on a modification of the Dean's Stress Inventory (DSI) instrument (Wild, et al., 2003). DSI is selected because it can accurately identify the potential sources of stress for a dean, which is also applicable in the context of academic leadership in general. This study involved 214 lecturers who responded to the PJSAL instrument via Google Form. Its construct validity was then assessed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), while its reliability was assessed based on Cronbach's Alpha values. The findings show that the PJSAL instrument has strong construct validity and good reliability (α = .965 for the entire instrument; α = .797- .918 for each subscale). The results of the EFA also reveal the existence of 10 factors in the PJSAL instrument, which are extracted from the 38 items composing it. The instrument is found not to be much different from DSI, except for the emergence of a new factor called role ambiguity.]]>
<![CDATA[Multidimensional Rasch Analysis of Gender Differences in Tes Intelegensi Kolektif Indonesia–Tinggi (TIKI-T) ]]>
<![CDATA[Whisnu Yudiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Airin Triwahyuni]]>;
<![CDATA[Hery Susanto]]>
<![CDATA[ JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.20417
<![CDATA[The empirical evidence on gender differences in the g-factor or general intelligence and various cognitive abilities remains contradictory. Some studies have found that there are no gender differences in general intelligence, while others have found differences between genders in verbal, spatial, and numerical abilities as measured by standardized cognitive tests. This study aims to examine the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) on standardized tests that measure verbal, numerical, and spatial/nonverbal abilities, as well as gender differences in item level. The multidimensional Rasch model was used to identify DIF based on four cognitive domains in the Tes Intelegensi Kolektif IndonesiaTinggi (TIKI-T) test. A total of 1,443 undergraduate students were tested. The results of the study showed that while there were several unbiased items, some items were clearly biased against males or females. The DIF was higher in the numerical and verbal subtests for female-male differences, while the DIF on male tests corresponded to spatial/nonverbal subtest performance. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.]]>
<![CDATA[The Development of Cyberbullying in Social Media Scale ]]>
<![CDATA[Shabrina Audinia]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewi Maulina]]>;
<![CDATA[Riangga Novrianto]]>;
<![CDATA[Bianca Alia Sudewaji]]>;
<![CDATA[Izzatullail Arpin Lotusiana]]>
<![CDATA[ JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.24142
<![CDATA[Despite the fact that cyberbullying is common on social media, only a few instruments have beendeveloped to assess cyberbullying tendencies in the social media context. The purpose of this study is to develop a Cyberbullying in Social Media Scale (CSMS) for cyberbullying perpetration. Participants are active social media users in Indonesia (n = 958) between the ages of 18 and 40. The Cronbach alpha reliability testing showed that CSMS had a high internal consistency (α =.852). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that CSMS fit the one-factor model (χ² (54) = 154.891, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.044 [90% CI 0.036, 0.052], CFI = 0.906, TLI = 0.885, SRMR = 0.049). Convergent-discriminant validity testing method using the Big Five Inventory also showed that CSMS is valid in measuring cyberbullying perpetration in the social media context. The Cyberbullying in Social Media Scale (CSMS) is a developed unidimensional measurement tool that evaluates cyberbullying tendencies on social media. The CSMS has demonstrated reliability and validity, making it a valuable new instrument for screening and assessing levels of cyberbullying tendencies among young adults in Indonesia. As such, the scale has practical applications for guiding interventions and investigating cyberbullying behavior.]]>
<![CDATA[Construct Validity of Posttraumatic Growth Inventory in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic ]]>
<![CDATA[Ardiana Meilinawati]]>
<![CDATA[ JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.24365
<![CDATA[Research that examines the construct validity of Posttraumatic Growth Inventory in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic has never been conducted. This study aimed to test the construct validity of Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) on the five dimensions to see the consistency of the PTGI dimensionality structure. Data collection was carried out on 135 COVID-19 survivors, aged 18–40 in Indonesia. Analysis was carried out by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and measurement invariance (MI). The results of the analysis proved that PTGI is a measuring instrument that tends to be multidimensional and reliable to be used in Indonesia. All model fit indices met the parameters based on the values of SRMR (<.06), RMSEA (<.10), CFI (>.85), and TLI (>.85). Factor loadings ranged from 0.616 to 0.839 except for item 6 and item 9, which were below 0.6. These low loading factors in item 6 and item 9 were caused by the choice of translated words which tend to be less precise with the dimension being measured. Recommendations related to changes in translated words were explained further in the article as a follow-up to the adjustment of the item statement. Other factors such as personality characteristics, level of self-esteem, and social stigma were also found to be associated with the results of the analysis. MI testing showed that the PTGI model was not influenced by gender in the study sample group.]]>
<![CDATA[Metacognitive Skills Assessment in Research-Proposal Writing (MSARPW) in the Indonesian University Context: Scale Development and Validation Using Multidimensional Item Response Models ]]>
<![CDATA[Bahrul Hayat]]>;
<![CDATA[Wardani Rahayu]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Dwirifqi Kharisma Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Iva Sarifah]]>;
<![CDATA[Tina Deviana]]>;
<![CDATA[Valendra Granitha Shandika Puri]]>;
<![CDATA[Khairunesa Isa]]>
<![CDATA[ JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.31679
<![CDATA[This study aimed to develop the Metacognitive Skills Assessment in a Research Proposal Writing Context (MSARPW), a multidimensional measure, based on student perspectives, for assessing metacognitive skills in thesis writing, and assess the instrument’s psychometric properties using item factor analysis (IFA) and multidimensional item response models. The 40-item MSARPW was administered to 602 Indonesian university students (Mage = 25.254 SDage = 6.854). The IFA showed that the two-dimensional factor structure of MSARPW was satisfactory; however, only 24 of the 40 items were found to fit the model. Multidimensional graded response models (MGRM) were applied to the subsequent 24-item MSARPW, which showed that one item (Item 4) did not satisfy the criteria. The estimated reliabilities of each subscale showed that the 23-item MSARPW has good internal consistency (0.891 and 0.902). To conclude, the 23-item MSARPW appears to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing metacognitive skills in the context of research-proposal writing among Indonesian university students.]]>
<![CDATA[Adaptation and Validation of the Indonesian version of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire ]]>
<![CDATA[Darmawan Muttaqin]]>;
<![CDATA[Shannen Vania Tanuwijaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Amabel Kylila]]>;
<![CDATA[Eunika Putri Kiara Bisowarno]]>;
<![CDATA[Eunike Kristea Soegianto]]>;
<![CDATA[Trivia Agatha]]>
<![CDATA[ JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.21945
<![CDATA[The Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (NARQ) was developed to measure theNarcissistic Admiration and Rivalry concept, as a new process model related to narcissism. This research aimed to adapt and validate the Indonesian version of the NARQ and involved 467 individuals aged 17- 25 years. Confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and correlation test were used to test the factor structure, internal consistency, and criterion validity of the Indonesian version of the NARQ. The results show that the NARQ has the best factor structure in the form of a two-factor hierarchical model, representing two dimensions and six aspects of narcissistic admiration and rivalry. Also, the Indonesian version of the NARQ is supported by satisfactory reliability and validity criteria. This finding indicates that the Indonesian version of the NARQ is a measuring tool that can be used to assess narcissistic admiration and rivalry in individuals aged 17-25 years in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Multidimensional Rasch Analysis of Gender Differences in Tes Intelegensi Kolektif Indonesia–Tinggi (TIKI-T) ]]>
<![CDATA[Whisnu Yudiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Airin Triwahyuni]]>;
<![CDATA[Hery Susanto]]>
<![CDATA[ JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.20417
<![CDATA[The empirical evidence on gender differences in the g-factor or general intelligence and various cognitive abilities remains contradictory. Some studies have found that there are no gender differences in general intelligence, while others have found differences between genders in verbal, spatial, and numerical abilities as measured by standardized cognitive tests. This study aims to examine the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) on standardized tests that measure verbal, numerical, and spatial/nonverbal abilities, as well as gender differences in item level. The multidimensional Rasch model was used to identify DIF based on four cognitive domains in the Tes Intelegensi Kolektif IndonesiaTinggi (TIKI-T) test. A total of 1,443 undergraduate students were tested. The results of the study showed that while there were several unbiased items, some items were clearly biased against males or females. The DIF was higher in the numerical and verbal subtests for female-male differences, while the DIF on male tests corresponded to spatial/nonverbal subtest performance. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.]]>
<![CDATA[The Development of Cyberbullying in Social Media Scale ]]>
<![CDATA[Shabrina Audinia]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewi Maulina]]>;
<![CDATA[Riangga Novrianto]]>;
<![CDATA[Bianca Alia Sudewaji]]>;
<![CDATA[Izzatullail Arpin Lotusiana]]>
<![CDATA[ JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.24142
<![CDATA[Despite the fact that cyberbullying is common on social media, only a few instruments have beendeveloped to assess cyberbullying tendencies in the social media context. The purpose of this study is to develop a Cyberbullying in Social Media Scale (CSMS) for cyberbullying perpetration. Participants are active social media users in Indonesia (n = 958) between the ages of 18 and 40. The Cronbach alpha reliability testing showed that CSMS had a high internal consistency (α =.852). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that CSMS fit the one-factor model (χ² (54) = 154.891, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.044 [90% CI 0.036, 0.052], CFI = 0.906, TLI = 0.885, SRMR = 0.049). Convergent-discriminant validity testing method using the Big Five Inventory also showed that CSMS is valid in measuring cyberbullying perpetration in the social media context. The Cyberbullying in Social Media Scale (CSMS) is a developed unidimensional measurement tool that evaluates cyberbullying tendencies on social media. The CSMS has demonstrated reliability and validity, making it a valuable new instrument for screening and assessing levels of cyberbullying tendencies among young adults in Indonesia. As such, the scale has practical applications for guiding interventions and investigating cyberbullying behavior.]]>
<![CDATA[Construct Validity of Posttraumatic Growth Inventory in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic ]]>
<![CDATA[Ardiana Meilinawati]]>
<![CDATA[ JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.24365
<![CDATA[Research that examines the construct validity of Posttraumatic Growth Inventory in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic has never been conducted. This study aimed to test the construct validity of Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) on the five dimensions to see the consistency of the PTGI dimensionality structure. Data collection was carried out on 135 COVID-19 survivors, aged 18–40 in Indonesia. Analysis was carried out by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and measurement invariance (MI). The results of the analysis proved that PTGI is a measuring instrument that tends to be multidimensional and reliable to be used in Indonesia. All model fit indices met the parameters based on the values of SRMR (<.06), RMSEA (<.10), CFI (>.85), and TLI (>.85). Factor loadings ranged from 0.616 to 0.839 except for item 6 and item 9, which were below 0.6. These low loading factors in item 6 and item 9 were caused by the choice of translated words which tend to be less precise with the dimension being measured. Recommendations related to changes in translated words were explained further in the article as a follow-up to the adjustment of the item statement. Other factors such as personality characteristics, level of self-esteem, and social stigma were also found to be associated with the results of the analysis. MI testing showed that the PTGI model was not influenced by gender in the study sample group.]]>
<![CDATA[Metacognitive Skills Assessment in Research-Proposal Writing (MSARPW) in the Indonesian University Context: Scale Development and Validation Using Multidimensional Item Response Models ]]>
<![CDATA[Bahrul Hayat]]>;
<![CDATA[Wardani Rahayu]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Dwirifqi Kharisma Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Iva Sarifah]]>;
<![CDATA[Tina Deviana]]>;
<![CDATA[Valendra Granitha Shandika Puri]]>;
<![CDATA[Khairunesa Isa]]>
<![CDATA[ JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 12, No 1 (2023): JP3I ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v12i1.31679
<![CDATA[This study aimed to develop the Metacognitive Skills Assessment in a Research Proposal Writing Context (MSARPW), a multidimensional measure, based on student perspectives, for assessing metacognitive skills in thesis writing, and assess the instrument’s psychometric properties using item factor analysis (IFA) and multidimensional item response models. The 40-item MSARPW was administered to 602 Indonesian university students (Mage = 25.254 SDage = 6.854). The IFA showed that the two-dimensional factor structure of MSARPW was satisfactory; however, only 24 of the 40 items were found to fit the model. Multidimensional graded response models (MGRM) were applied to the subsequent 24-item MSARPW, which showed that one item (Item 4) did not satisfy the criteria. The estimated reliabilities of each subscale showed that the 23-item MSARPW has good internal consistency (0.891 and 0.902). To conclude, the 23-item MSARPW appears to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing metacognitive skills in the context of research-proposal writing among Indonesian university students.]]>
