cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 16 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 10 No 4 (2021)" : 16 Documents clear
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen yang Dirugikan dalam Fintech Lending Transaksi Peminjaman Uang Online Perspektif UU No 8 Tahun 1999 M Shidqon Prabowo; Lulu’ul Karimah
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p07

Abstract

The purpose of the research entitled "Legal Protection for Consumers Who Are Lost in Fintech Lending Online Money Lending Transactions" is to talk about the role of technology which plays a significant role in determining people's welfare and in triggering actions that are contrary to the law. With the existence of online businesses, especially those engaged in financial services (fintech), it is therefore also an important task for the Government in responding to forms of legal protection. Therefore, it is very important in this paper, the author raises issues related to what form of legal protection is for fintech lending consumers who are disadvantaged in online money lending transactions and how the validity of illegal online loans is. The research method used in this research is normative juridical research, namely legal research based on its analysis of laws and regulations related to the problem that is the focus of research. In this study, the authors use primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. To be further analyzed using a descriptive analytical approach and using a statutory approach (statute approach), and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). Tujuan penelitian yang berjudul “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Yang Dirugikan Dalam Fintech Lending Transaksi Peminjaman Uang Online” adalah membicarakan tentang peran teknologi yang sangat andil dalam menentukan kesejahteraan masyarakat dan dalam memicu terjadinya perbuatan yang bertentangan dengan hukum. Dengan adanya keberadaan bisnis online khususnya yang bergerak di bidang jasa keuangan (fintech) oleh karena itu juga menjadi tugas penting Pemerintah dalam merespon bentuk perlindungan hukum. Oleh karena itu sangat penting dalam penulisan ini, Penulis mengangkat permasalahan terkait apa bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen fintech lending yang dirugikan dalam transaksi peminjaman uang secara online dan bagaimana keabsahan pinjaman online ilegal. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif, yakni penelitian hukum berdasarkan analisisnya pada peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan masalah yang menjadi fokus penelitian. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Untuk selanjutnya dianalisis dengan menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif analitis serta menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach).
Kedudukan Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah terkait Berlakunya Sistem Publikasi Negatif di Indonesia Putu Astika Yasa; I Nyoman Bagiastra
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p12

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article aims to provide an understanding related to how the status of property rights certificates with the enactment of the negative publication system. The research method used is a normative research method. The results of the research are (1) The regulation of land ownership rights by the people in Indonesia is regulated in Law no. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles which was later explained in more detail through Government Regulation no. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration as the legal basis and contains procedures for the process and settlement and, (2) Legal certainty regarding land ownership rights with the application of a negative publication system is evidenced by a land certificate which will have a permanent position after 5 (five) years. ) years no one has sued or proved otherwise. Tujuan dari penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman yang berkaitan dengan bagaimana kedudukan sertipikat hak milik dengan berlakunya sistem publikasi negatif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normative dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitiannya adalah (1) Pengaturan hak atas kepemilikan tanah oleh masyarakat di Indonesia diatur dalam Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok – Pokok Agraria yang kemudian dijelaskan lebih detail melalui Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah sebagai dasar hukumnya dan memuat mengenai tata cara proses dan penyelesaiannya dan, (2) Kepastian hukum mengenai hak atas kepemilikan tanah dengan berlakunya sistem publikasi negatif dibuktikan dengan sertipikat tanah yang dimana akan memiliki kedudukan yang tetap ketika setelah 5 (lima) tahun tidak ada yang menggugat atau membuktikan sebaliknya.
Urgency of TRIPs Waiver in Patent Legal Protection against Covid 19 Vaccine Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p03

Abstract

The emergence of Covid 19 in December 2019 in the city of Wuhan, China which spread throughout the world caused the WHO to finally declare it a pandemic. This is in line with the emergence of new products that have intellectual property values ??related to the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, one of which is vaccines which are very essential. Intellectual Property protection provisions can lead to monopolistic practices of knowledge by the pharmaceutical industry in developed countries. This is a form of abuse of intellectual property protection, especially patent protection by corporations that hide behind exclusive rights in intellectual property protection. Exclusive rights provide the authority to prevent other people from producing and trading products whose technology is requested for protection in an effort to keep profits in the hands of intellectual property holders. The Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Waiver proposal promoted by India and South Africa opened the world's eyes that the increase in COVID-19 cases, the emergence of new variants and the global vaccination gap are reminders that countries in the world must work together in dealing with pandemic. In writing this research using normative legal research methods as a characteristic of legal science is its normative nature. This research started from the existence of a norm vacuum in the TRIPS Agreement where there was no neglect of several provisions in the TRIPs.
Perseroan Perorangan Pada Usaha Mikro dan Kecil: Kedudukan dan Tanggung Jawab Organ Perseroan Putu Devi Yustisia Utami; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p08

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to determine the position of company organs and to analyze the authority and responsibility of company organs in Individual Limited Liability Company. This study used a normative juridical method with a statutory and concept approach. The study indicated that the position of the company's organs in Individual Limited Liability Company is different from the Limited Liability Company organs. The organs of Limited Liability Company consist of the General Meeting Shareholders (GMS), Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners, while the organs of the Individual Limited Liability Company consist of Shareholders as well as Directors and doesn’t have Board of Commissioners. The authority and responsibility of the Individual Limited Liability Company organs can be seen in the provisions of article 109 number (5) of the Job Creation Law which includes articles 153 letter d and 153 letter j. Individual Limited Liability Company in Indonesia adhere to the one tier system, but there are differences between the one tier system in Indonesia and the Anglo Saxon countries. The company's organs in Anglo Saxon countries still consist of the GMS, Directors and Commissioners who can hold concurrent positions, whereas in Individual Limited Liability Company in Indonesia, shareholders only hold concurrent positions. as the Board of Directors and eliminate the organs of the Board of Commissioners. Individual Company Organs in PP No. 8/2021 is not in accordance with the provisions of the company organs in the above regulations, namely the Job Creation Law and the Company Law. Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan organ perseroan pada perseroan perorangan serta menganalisis wewenang dan tanggung jawab organ perseroan perorangan. Metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan organ perseroan pada perseroan perorangan berbeda dengan organ PT pada umumnya. Organ PT terdiri dari RUPS, Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris, sedangkan organ perseroan perorangan terdiri dari Pemegang Saham sekaligus Direktur namun tidak memiliki organ Dewan Komisaris. Wewenang dan tanggung jawab organ perseroan perorangan dapat dilihat pada ketentuan pasal 109 angka (5) UU Cipta Kerja yang menyisipkan pasal 153 huruf d dan 153 huruf j. Perseroan perorangan di Indonesia menganut one tier system, namun terdapat perbedaan mengenai one tier system yang dianut oleh Indonesia dengan yang dianut oleh negara Anglo Saxon. Pada negara Anglo Saxon organ perseroan tetap terdiri dari RUPS, Direksi dan Komisaris yang dapat dirangkap jabatan, sedangkan pada perseroan perorangan di Indonesia pemegang saham hanya merangkap jabatan sebagai Direksi dan tidak ada organ Dewan Komisaris. Organ perseroan perorangan pada PP No. 8/2021 tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan organ perseroan pada peraturan diatasnya yakni UU Cipta Kerja dan UUPT.
Relevansi Mediasi Penal di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana I Wayan Didik Prayoga; I Ketut Rai Setiabudi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p13

Abstract

This study aims to describe and analyze the concepts of restorative justice and penal mediation which are linked to their existence and relevance to their application in the Indonesian criminal justice system in the perspective of criminal law reform. The research method used is a normative legal research method with the approach used is the statue approach, the concept approach, and the comparative approach. The results of this study, firstly, penal mediation is one form of the implementation of restorative justice which views crime as not only an act that violates the law, but more broadly as an act that violates the balance in society. Second, penal mediation is relevant to be applied in the Indonesian criminal justice system in the future, especially from the perspective of the urgency of criminal law reform, and to answer the problems faced by the Indonesian criminal justice system. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan serta menganalisis paradigma keadilan restoratif dan mediasi penal yang dikaitkan eksistensinya dan relevansi penerapanya dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia dalam perspektif pembaharuan hukum pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach), dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini, pertama mediasi penal merupakan bagian dari pelaksanaan keadilan restoratif yang memandang kejahatan tidak hanya perbuatan yang melanggar undang-undang, melainkan lebih luas sebagai perbuatan yang melanggar keseimbangan dalam masyarakat. Kedua, mediasi penal relevan untuk diterapkan dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia di masa depan khususnya ditinjau dari perspetif urgensi pembaharuan hukum pidana, dan untuk menjawab persoalan yang dihadapi sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia.
Consequences of Non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision in Judicial Review of the UUD 1945 Putu Eka Pitriyantini; Ni Luh Gede Astariyani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p04

Abstract

This writing aimed to examine the causes of non-compliance with the implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision as well as analyze and axamine the consequence of non-compliance with the decisions of the Constitutional Court in Reviewing Laws and Constitutional Court Decisions. This writing was normative legal research using statutory approach, conceptual approach and historical approach. The study indicated that there are several causes leading to non-compliance with the implementation of the Constitutional Court Decisions; among others are the sectoral ego of state institutions that causes reluctance to implement the Constitutional Court decisions, the Constitutional Court which does not have an executive body, the void of legal norms, the connection with state institutions that are obliged to follow up on the Constitutional Court decisions, and the interpretation of the final meaning attached to the Constitutional Court decisions. These things have resulted in injustice to the petitioners and citizen whose constitutional rights have been violated by policies of government.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 16

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue