cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 15 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 9 No 4 (2020)" : 15 Documents clear
Indonesian Labor Sector During Covid-19 : Weighing the Impact of Company Saving Policy and Workers Protection Kadek Agus Sudiarawan; Putu Devi Yustisia Utami; Gede Agus Angga Saputra; Alia Yofira Karunian
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p02

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has a very significant impact on the global economy, especially in the business sector, which has suffered significant losses. On this matter it is deemed necessary to carry out research with the objectives first, to determine whether the policies implemented by companies in the form of employment termination and temporary workers layoff in order to survive the company can be legally justified, second, to determine what forms of legal protection should be obtained by workers in an industrial relationship with companies amidst of COVID-19, and third, to determine what forms of work relations/alternative policy models that can be offered to companies to be able to ease the burden on the company while being able to provide protection for workers amidst COVID-19. Research method that is applied is normative legal research with a statutory approach and legal concepts. The results show that company policies in the form of layoffs during the COVID-19 pandemic can be justified as long as they comply with the provisions of Article 163 to Article 165 of the Manpower Law, the act of laying off workers can be justified as long as it complies the provisions of the Minister of Manpower Circular Letter Number 5/1998 and Minister of Manpower Circular Letter Number 907/2004. Legal protection that shall be obtained if a worker is laid off must comply with the provisions of Article 156 of the Manpower Law. Companies can implement an industrial relationship by implementing Work From Home (WFH) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Eksekusi Pembakaran/Penenggelaman Kapal Tindak Pidana Illegal Fishing Berbendera Asing Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Guntur Dirga Saputra
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p07

Abstract

Indonesia's natural resources in the form of very wide waters pose a threat to the crime of illegal fishing. The prevention of these crimes is carried out by giving the investigator authority to sink / burn ships with foreign flags directly without a court decision having permanent legal force as regulated in Law 45/2009. This research is a normative legal research. The results of this writing explain that the sinking / burning of foreign-flagged ships by investigators is contrary to Article 28D Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which is hierarchically higher than Law 45/2009 and SPP regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code so that it does not provide justice and legal certainty because it has seized the rights of the suspect / defendant. The sinking / burning of the ship is the authority of the Public Prosecutor to carry out the execution after a court decision has permanent legal force which stipulates that evidence in the form of a ship is seized for destruction and is not under the authority of the investigator. The government and the DPR RI should revise Law 45/2009 to revoke the authority of investigators who can directly sink / burn ships and to the Prosecutor to coordinate and involve investigators to become witnesses in the execution. Kekayaan alam Indonesia berupa perairan yang sangat luas menimbulkan ancaman terjadinya tindak pidana illegal fishing. Penanggulangan kejahatan tersebut dilakukan dengan memberikan kewenangan kepada penyidik untuk melakukan penenggelaman/pembakaran kapal yang berbendera asing yang secara langsung tanpa putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap sebagaimana diatur dalam UU 45/2009. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penulisan ini menjelaskan bahwa Penenggelaman/pembakaran kapal berbendera asing oleh Penyidik bertentangan dengan Pasal 28D Ayat (1) UUDNRI 1945 yang secara hirarki lebih tinggi dari UU 45/2009 dan SPP yang diatur dalam KUHAP sehingga tidak memberikan keadilan dan kepastian hukum oleh karena telah merampas hak tersangka/terdakwa. Penenggelaman/pembakaran kapal merupakan kewenangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum untuk melakukan eksekusi setelah adanya putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap yang menetapkan barang bukti berupa kapal untuk dirampas untuk dimusnahkan dan bukan merupakan kewenangan penyidik. Pemerintah dengan DPR RI agar melakukan revisi UU 45/2009 untuk mencabut kewenangan penyidik yang secara langsung dapat melakukan penenggelaman/pembakaran kapal dan kepada Jaksa agar melakukan kordinasi dan melibatkan penyidik untuk menjadi saksi dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi.
Penggunaan Akta Kuasa Menjual Sebagai Jaminan Pelunasan Utang Dalam Peralihan Kepemilikan Hak Milik Atas Tanah Rosa Lianda Islami; dahlan dahlan; suhaimi suhaimi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p12

Abstract

Power of attorney is a statement whereby a person gives authority to another person or legal entity to and on his behalf perform legal acts. The practice of granting power of attorney based on a power of attorney to sell made by a notary is not in accordance with the regulations, as a result the power of attorney used as collateral for debt repayment contains elements of illegal acts. The decisions reviewed in this thesis research are decision number: 69 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PN.Bna and decision number: 70 / PDT / 2017 / PT.BDG. The purpose of this study is to analyze the law of the use of selling deeds as collateral for debt repayment in the transfer of ownership of land rights. This type of research is normative juridical with an invited approach and a case approach. The source of the legal material used is secondary data which is analyzed qualitatively and comes from deductive. The results reveal that whether the deed that sells as collateral for debt repayment in the transfer of ownership of land ownership is in accordance with the regulations. Kuasa adalah pernyataan dengan mana seseorang memberikan wewenang kepada orang atau badan hukum lain untuk dan atas namanya melakukan perbuatan hukum. Praktiknya pemberian kuasa berdasarkan akta kuasa menjual yang dibuat notaris tidak berjalan sesuai peraturan perundang-undangan, akibatnya akta kuasa menjual yang digunakan sebagai jaminan pelunasan utang mengandung unsur perbuatan melawan hukum. Adapun putusan yang dikaji dalam penelitian tesis ini yaitu putusan nomor: 69/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Bna dan putusan nomor : 70/PDT/2017/PT.BDG. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis akibat hukum dari penggunaan akta kuasa menjual sebagai jaminan pelunasan utang dalam peralihan kepemilikan hak milik atas tanah. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan bersifat yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif dan ditarik kesimpulan secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa apakah akta kuasa menjual sebagai jaminan pelunasan utang dalam peralihan kepemilikan hak milik atas tanah sudah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan.
The Ontological of State of Law of Pancasila as The Basis of Welfare State in Indonesia I Nyoman Bagiastra
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p03

Abstract

The rule of law as stated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, namely article 1 Section 3 of the 1945 Constitution which states explicitly that the State of the Republic of Indonesia is a rule of law, of course, has juridical consequences that must be accounted for in the practice of community life, nation, and state. By claiming to be a rule of law, Indonesia must fulfill and realize all the requirements and principles contained in a rule of law, namely the state has the obligation and provides legal certainty for protection to realize the welfare of its citizens. The research method used is normative legal research. the welfare state is briefly described as a series of public policies and state activities in integrating economic policies and social policies for the sake of achieving prosperity.
Valuasi Merek sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan: Relevansi dalam Pembentukan Lembaga Penilai Kekayaan Intelektual I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 4 (2020)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p08

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the relevance of regulating the Intellectual Property Guarantee Institution as credit to banks in Indonesia in the future. The research method in this paper uses normative legal research, with a statutory approach and developing doctrines, as well as a comparative approach. The result found from this paper is that there is a need for synergy in the guarantee legal system in Indonesia, particularly in regulating intellectual property valuation, including the urgency to form an institution that handles the valuation of movable objects of intangible intellectual property. This is very much needed in encouraging the creative economy which in turn improves the welfare of the Indonesian people. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji relevansinya pengaturan Lembaga Penilai Jaminan Kekayaan Intelektual sebagai kredit pada perbankan di Indonesia di masa mendatang. Metode penelitian dalam tulisan ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan doktrin-doktrin yang berkembang, serta pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil yang ditemukan dari tulisan ini adalah perlu adanya sinergitas dalam sistem hukum jaminan di Indonesia, khususnya pengaturan valuasi kekayaan intelektual termasuk urgensinya dibentuk sebuah Lembaga yang menangani valuasi benda bergerak tak berwujud kekayaan intelektual. Hal ini sangat dibutuhkan dalam mendorong ekonomi kreatif yang pada akhirnya meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat Indonesia.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 15

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue