JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Articles
664 Documents
<![CDATA[The Issue of Authority Between the National Police Republic of Indonesia and National Narcotics Agency in Handling The Case of Narcotics ]]>
<![CDATA[Isya Nalapraja]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (407.564 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i04.p02
<![CDATA[Narcotics eradication is carried out by the National Narcotics Agency based on Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics concerning investigations, and narcotics precursor accompanied by wiretapping. In addition to the National Narcotics Agency in Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Police that Police Investigators and Civil Servant Investigators have the same authority in combating narcotics. This will lead to a mechanism duet against law enforcement in the framework of eradicating narcotics. This study uses normative legal research methods that depart from the existence of conflicting norms between the authority of the Police and the National Narcotics Agency. Due to the occurrence of authority disputes between the National Narcotics Agency and the Police Force, law enforcement has been ineffective because of the poor coordination of the two institutions and Agency, resulting in competing for authority and causing abuse of authority.]]>
<![CDATA[PERKEMBANGAN KEDUDUKAN PEREMPUAN DALAM HUKUM ADBALI (Studi di Kota Denpasar) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Nyoman Sukerti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (193.233 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2014.v03.i02.p02
<![CDATA[Women as citizens of the ancients is still received discriminatory treatment in someaspects of life, although the government has made some rules that provide protection towomen evens have ratified CEDAW. The Constitution also been set in Article 27, paragraphs1 and 2, but discrimination against women still exist, especially in the traditional law of Baliinheritance. On the basis of the two problems posed namely 1). Against wealth whose positiondaughter suffered developments in traditional law of Bali heritance? and, 2). What factorsinfluence the occurrence of the development of women position in traditional law of Baliheritance ? Results of the research showed that inherited asset is generally daughter disposableproperty rich guna kaya. Varied forms of inherited property have fixed things as well asmoving objects. Rights received largely daughter also vary greatly between the cases of theother cases, this depends of the economic condition of her parents. Daughter of position heirsare not burdened family responsibilities. So, the position of the daughter of experience in thedevelopment of traditional law of Bali heritance limited -use property rich guna kaya .Factors that influence the occurrence of the development of women position in traditional law of Bali heritance, the availability of legislation that gender perspective, there is aparadigm shift in attitude and behavior of the parents of the girls looked, viability of publiceducation level and economy growing family.]]>
<![CDATA[KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN KEBIJAKAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Luh Gede Astariyani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (381.28 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i04.p08
<![CDATA[Shifting the notion countries formal law into state law meteriil (wefare staat) within the meaning of the welfare state agency or official Administrative often take a variety of specific policy measures, among others, creating what is commonly called policy rule(beleidsregel). Such products can not be separated from the association Freies ermessen. In order setting is a rule or rules of conduct set that regulation (Regeling) can be found in the legislation (Algemeen verbindende voorschriften) internal rules that apply to the (interne regelingen) and policy (beleidrege). Establishing the policy rule (beleidsregel) is located on the beoordelingsruimte (space considerations) given by the legislators to officials or governing bodies to take action on its own initiative public law that is setting, determination and positive action to resolve the problem- governance problems faced. Freis ermessen only intended use in the public interest. Freis ernessen implementation should be morally accountable to God Almighty, uphold the dignity and the degree of human dignity and the values ??of truth and justice, promoting unity and oneness, for the sake of joint / public interest. Tests on policy rule is more geared to doelmatigheid guided by the general principles of good governance]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaturan Hukum Keterwakilan Perempuan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 Tentang MPR, DPR, DPD dan DPRD Ditinjau Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 82/PUU-XII/2014 ]]>
<![CDATA[I Putu Oka Pratiwi Widasmara]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (344.896 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i02.p06
<![CDATA[The enactment of Law No. 42 of 2014 on the People’s Consultative Assembly, House of Representatives, Regional Representatives Council, and the House of Representatives has been structured and systematically remove all provisions relating to the representation of women. This law creates legal uncertainty representation of women and contrary to the constitution, thus filed a judical review to the Constitutional Court which led to the Cosntitutional Court Decision No. 82/PUU-XII/2014. Issues raised in this research is how the arrangement representation of woman in Act No. 42 of 2014 after the enactment of the Cosntitutional Court Decision. Normative juridical approach to the analysis of legislation and approachment concepts is used in this legal research. The conclusion of this law is the removal of the clause representation of women in Act No. 42 of 2014 was contrary to the various sources of international law, also contrary to Article 28D (1) and Article 28H paragraph (2) of the Constitution of 1945 and in iys decision, the Cosntitutional Court restore “representation of women”clause apllies in Act No. 27 of 2009 by replacing the phrase “pay attention”with “make as priority”to regulate womem’s representation more seriously. Diberlakukannya Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah telah secara terstruktur dan sistematis menghapus seluruh ketentuan yang menyangkut keterwakilan perempuan. Hal ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum keterwakilan perempuan dan bertentangan dengan konstitusi, sehingga diajukan uji materiil ke Mahkamah Konstitusi yang berujung pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 822/PUU-XII/2014. Permasalah yang diangkat adalah bagaimana pengaturan keterwakilan perempuan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelititan hukum ini berbentuk penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan analisis konsep hukum. Kesimpulan dari penelitian hukum ini adalah dihilangkannya klausula keterwakilan perempuan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 telah bertentangan dengan berbagai sumber hukum internasional, bertentangan pula dengan Pasal 28D ayat (1) dan Pasal 28H ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar NRI 1945 serta dalam putusannya Mahkamah Konstitusi mengembalikan klausula keterwakilan perempuan yang berlaku dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2009 dengan mengganti frasa “memperhatikan” dengan frasa “mengutamakan” untuk lebih sungguh-sungguh mengatur keterwakilan perempuan.]]>
<![CDATA[Urgensi Ratifikasi Konvensi International Labor Organization: Perspektif Perlindungan Pekerja Anak Pada Sektor Rumah Tangga ]]>
<![CDATA[Rika Putri Subekti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (289.092 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i01.p03
<![CDATA[The issue of domestic worker has not become governor of Indonesia policy priorities. This can be seen from the lack of a structure for the comprehensive and lack of regulations that provide solutions, as well as lack of supporting structure of the implementation. The Act of Manpower is not regulating specifically on the protection of domestic workers, especially for children. International Labor Organization Convention Number 189 concerning Decent Works for Domestic Worker, regulates the protection of domestic workers all over the world, however, Indonesia has not ratified this convention yet. This research is normative legal research that using statute and conceptual approach. Data collection techniques used in this study is literature study. The results of the study indicate that the regulation on the protection of child laborers employed as a domestic worker in Indonesia has not been regulated separately so that in the case of legal protection is not sufficient, in the case of law enforcement in case of violation of the law on the rights of the child. The urgency for the Government to immediately ratify ILO Convention No. 189 on Decent Work of Domestic Workers in order to establish a standard of employment for domestic workers as an effort to realize protection for domestic workers in general and for child domestic workers in particular. It is important for government to carry out the National Action Plan for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labor (RAN-WFCL) to prevent and eliminate the worst forms of child labor. Isu tentang Pekerja Rumah Tangga (PRT) belum menjadi suatu prioritas kebijakan pemerintah Indonesia. Hal ini terlihat dari belum adanya suatu struktur regulasi yang komprehensif dan solutif, disertai struktur pendukung dalam tataran implementasinya. Ketentuan Undang-Undang tentang Ketenagakerjaan belum mengatur secara khusus mengenai perlindungan terhadap pembantu rumah tangga khususnya bagi anak-anak. Namun telah ada konvensi internasional yang mengatur secara khusus tentang Pekerja Rumah Tangga (PRT) yaitu Konvensi ILO Nomor 189 tentang Kerja Layak Pembantu Rumah Tangga. Konvensi ini merupakan perlindungan bagi pembantu rumah tangga di seluruh dunia. Namun, hingga saat ini Indonesia belum meratifikasi konvensi tersebut. Jenis Penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Jenis pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah studi kepustakaan. Hasil Penelitian menunjukan bahwa pengaturan tentang perlindungan pekerja anak yang dipekerjakan sebagai pembantu rumah tangga di Indonesia belum diatur secara khusus sehingga dalam hal perlindungan hukum belum memadai. Urgensi bagi Pemerintah untuk segera meratifikasi Konvensi ILO Nomor 189 tentang Kerja Layak PRT dalam rangka menetapkan suatu standard ketenagakerjaan bagi PRT sebagai upaya mewujudkan perlindungan bagi PRT secara umum dan bagi PRT Anak pada khususnya. Upaya Pemerintah dalam mewujudkan perlindungan terhadap PRT Anak adalah dengan melakukan Rencana Aksi Nasional Penghapusan Bentuk-Bentuk Pekerjaan Terburuk Bagi Anak (RAN-BPTA) yang bertujuan untuk mencegah dan menghapus bentuk-bentuk pekerjaan terburuk untuk anak.]]>
<![CDATA[Mereposisi Korban dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia: Suatu Keterlemparan (gowerfen-sein) dalam Mitos Modernitas ]]>
<![CDATA[Rocky Marbun]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (498.15 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p07
<![CDATA[Myths in the modern era are things that are considered like truth. It arises through the process of hegemony and dialectical domination by the authority in history. So, myth is a phenomenon of common sense without criticism. The state's presence in the criminal justice process as a grand narrative identified with the interests of victims and society, in general, is common sense without criticism. This study aims to reveal whether the myth of modernity is a representation of victims in the Criminal Justice System. This study uses a normative juridical method based on secondary data with several models of approaches, including conceptual approaches, philosophical approaches, and critical approaches. The result of this research shows the phenomenon of objectification and reification of the people as victims in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Mitos dalam era modern merupakan hal-hal yang diandaikan begitu saja sebagai suatu kebenaran. Hal tersebut tampil melalui proses hegemoni dan dominasi dalam dialektika otoritas dalam sejarah. Sehingga, mitos merupakan suatu fenomena common sense tanpa kritik. Kehadiran negara dalam proses peradilan pidana sebagai narasi tunggal (grand narrative) yang diidentikan dengan kepentingan korban dan masyarakat secara umum, merupakan common sense tanpa kritik. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk membongkar apakah mitos modernitas tersebut merupakan representasi korban dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang berbasis kepada data sekunder dengan beberapa model pendekatan, antara lain pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan filsafat, dan pendekatan kritis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya fenomena objektivikasi dan reifikasi terhadap masyarakat sebagai korban dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[ASAS PROPORSIONALITAS DALAM PEMBAYARAN GANTI RUGI MELALUI ASURANSI DALAM KASUS MALPRAKTIK DOKTER ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Putu Ayu Myra Gerhana Putri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (119.593 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2013.v02.i02.p03
<![CDATA[In a malpractice medical insurance context, indemnity obligations of malpractice,particularly for improper practice performed by medical team, currently only based onoverall team fault, means every physician in the team should bear the compensation evenly.This scheme is not fair because the physician who did lower degree of mistakes must bear thecompensation as great as the physician with higher degree of mistakes. That is whyproporsional concept, based on the degree of the mistakes, for indemnity obligations needs tobe considered. However, this scheme will need some instruments that can align theresponsibility among the physician in the team. This instrument then can be used as a basisfor determining the degree of mistakes and further the level of compensation the physicianneed to bear with. This research is a normative legal research and using a statue approach,means legislation as the primary legal materials. In addition, this research also uses books,articles, and materials from the Internet, as well as direct interview with the competentparties as a secunder data. The results showed that because there are no rules governing thelaw of proporsionality in the legislation make the degree of mistakes is not used as basis fordetermining the compensation’s level. In fact there are instruments that can be used as basisto determine the degree of mistakes such as Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) andMedical Professional Standard. It is clear that the healthcare legislation should includeprovisions that govern the determination of the compensation by using proportionalapproach, in order to align the responsibility among the parties]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KOPERASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA MELAKUKAN KEGIATAN PERBANKAN TANPA IJIN ]]>
<![CDATA[Dessy Lina Oktaviani Suendra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (377.746 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2015.v04.i02.p15
<![CDATA[Cooperative in Indonesia today is inseparable from the possibility of a criminal act, one criminal offense related banking licenses. Conflicts occur in the setting of norms of criminal responsibility in the cooperative banking activities without a license, where the Cooperatives Act only regulates the sanctions administrtif for cooperatives, but cooperative management is not subject to criminal sanctions, while the Banking Act regulated the criminal sanctions for the management / leadership of the cooperative. Based on this background, the didapatlah formulation of the problem, namely: 1) How is criminal responsibility in case of banking criminal acts without permission undertaken by cooperatives 2) Who is responsible for committing a crime when the cooperative banking without permission.This research is a normative legal research. The data used in this study include primary and secondary data. Data collection techniques used is literature study technique using a systematic method through the card system. Legal materials analysis techniques used are descriptive analysis technique, argumentation technique, interpretation and analysis techniques. Of overall relevant data will be processed and analyzed in a way compiling such data systematically and selectively, then the data is analyzed in terms of the descriptions are accompanied by an explanation of the theories of law. These results indicate that the cooperative actions that can be accounted for criminal is a criminal offense embezzlement, criminal fraud, banking criminal acts and corruption. As for the banking criminal acts that can be performed by the cooperative is a criminal offense related banking licenses, in which for the moment in its criminal liability still refers to the Banking Act which provide criminal sanctions for those who give orders / leader. While the parties responsible for committing a crime if the cooperative banking without permission is a cooperative management.]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBATASAN TRANSAKSI TUNAI DI INDONESIA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG ]]>
<![CDATA[Agus Cakra Nugraha]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (632.036 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2017.v06.i02.p06
<![CDATA[Combating crime is repressive, in the old paradigm insists on Follow the Suspect is more focused on the pursuit of the perpetrators. Unlike the case with the new paradigm that emphasizes the pursuit of money or the Follow the Money or trying to trace property derived from crime, which is then reconstructed where wealth and what criminal act that gave birth to such property. This approach is easier than with conventional approaches for money laundering is the weakest link of a crime. Pursuing the perpetrators of crimes are relatively more difficult, than the pursuit of crime. Pemberantasan kejahatan secara represif, dalam paradigma lama menekankan pada Follow the Suspect lebih menitikberatkan pada pengejaran para pelaku kejahatan. Berbeda halnya dengan paradigma baru yang lebih menekankan untuk mengejar uang atau Follow the Money atau berupaya melacak harta kekayaan yang berasal dari kejahatan, yang kemudian direkonstruksi dari mana kekayaan itu dan tindak pidana apa yang melahirkan kekayaan tersebut. Pendekatan ini lebih mudah dibandingkan dengan pendekatan konvensional karena pencucian uang adalah mata rantai paling lemah dari suatu kejahatan. Mengejar pelaku kejahatan relatif lebih sulit, dibandingkan dengan mengejar hasil kejahatan.]]>
<![CDATA[Implikasi Hukum Paris Agreement Melalui Program REDD+ Berbasis Blue Carbon Di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Elda Sofia]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (826.36 KB)
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i02.p03
<![CDATA[To replace the Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC post-2020 the Participating Countries of UNFCCC made a new commitment namely Paris Agreement to the UNFCCC. Indonesia has ratified the Paris Agreement to become its national law. In Paris Agreement to the UNFCCC, all Countries should reduce greenhouse gas/GHG emissions following the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities. GHG emissions reductions obligations are set out in a nationally determined contribution/NDC. Within the NDC, Indonesia achieves emission reduction greenhouse gas targets up to 29% on its own and up 41% with international assistance. GHG emissions reductions through the forestry sectors are key sectors in NDC Indonesia at 17.2%. Using the method of normative research through an approach to legislation. After ratified of Paris Agreement to the UNFCCC brings legal implications for Indonesia namely the establishment of the laws on REDD+ in the forestry sector. Efforts made by the government of Indonesia is the establishment of the laws on REDD+. It has found the legal problem which can be a factor inhibiting the achievement of NDC target consisting of law enforcement, legal certainty of forest area. It is suggested that the Government of Indonesia makes regulation on mangrove forest. Untuk menggantikan Kyoto Protocol pasca 2020 Negara Peserta UNFCCC membuat komitmen baru yaitu Paris Agreement to the UNFCCC. Indonesia telah meratifikasi Paris Agreement menjadi hukum nasional. Di dalam Paris Agreement to the UNFCCC, semua negara diberikan kewajiban untuk mengurangi emisi gas rumah kaca sesuai dengan prinsip common but differentiated responsibilities. Kewajiban pengurangan emisi gas rumah kaca ditetapkan dalam nationally determined contribution/NDC. Di dalam NDC, Indonesia mempunyai target untuk mengurangi emisi gas rumah kaca sebesar 29% dengan usaha sendiri dan sampai dengan 41% dengan bantuan internasional. Pengurangan emisi gas rumah kaca melalui sektor kehutanan adalah sektor utama dalam NDC Indonesia yaitu sebesar 17.2%. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yaitu melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan. Pasca diratifikasinya Paris Agreement to the UNFCCC membawa implikasi hukum bagi Indonesia yaitu dibentuknya sejumlah peraturan-peraturan terkait REDD+ di sektor kehutanan. Upaya-upaya yang dilakukan pemerintah Indonesia untuk mengimplementasikan Paris Agreement to the UNFCCC sektor kehutanan adalah membentuk sejumlah peraturan-peraturan hukum terkait REDD+. Persoalan-persoalan hukum yang ditemui menjadi faktor penghambat tercapainya target NDC Indonesia yaitu penegakan hukum, kepastian hukum kawasan hutan. Disarankan agar dibentuknya regulasi tentang perlindungan terhadap hutan mangrove.]]>
