cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 664 Documents
 63   64   65   66   67 
Analysis of Police and Customs Technology in Combating Illegal Cigarettes in Indonesia Isnawan, Fuadi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i01.p04

Abstract

his study aims to explore the role of police technology, particularly through the use of cyber patrols and cyber police, in detecting, cracking down on, and suppressing the circulation of illegal cigarettes in Indonesia, as well as how technology can serve as a preventive effort to reduce the distribution of illegal cigarettes. This normative study focuses on the analysis of relevant legal regulations and policies. The novelty of this research lies in its emphasis on the role of police technology, specifically through cyber patrol and cyber police operations, in combating the illegal circulation of cigarettes, introducing new perspectives to fill existing gaps in the literature. The findings reveal that the role of police technology, particularly through the operations of cyber police and cyber patrol units, has become increasingly critical in detecting, cracking down on, and suppressing the circulation of illegal cigarettes in Indonesia. Law enforcement’s adaptability to the evolving digital landscape is essential in addressing crimes facilitated by e-commerce and social media as channels for illicit cigarette trade. By employing cyber surveillance, digital tracking, and coordinated online efforts, the Indonesian National Police and specialized cyber units have developed effective strategies to mitigate these illegal activities. Preventive efforts also include educational initiatives and digital campaigns on social media to raise public legal awareness and compliance. The innovative use of digital tools such as the Illegal Cigarette Information System (SIROLEG) exemplifies technological integration in optimizing reporting and coordination among enforcement units. This study concludes that strategic technological interventions offer a holistic, effective framework for addressing the complex challenges posed by the illegal tobacco trade in Indonesia.
Legality of Virtual Hindu Marriage in the Perspective of National Law in Indonesia Arthadana, Made Gede; Wibawa, I Putu Sastra; Sarjana, I Putu
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 4 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i04.p09

Abstract

The general purpose of writing in this scientific journal is to find out the legal basis for marriage for Hindus in Bali and specifically to find out the legality of virtual Hindu marriages from the perspective of National Law in Indonesia. The writing method used is descriptive normative legal research using a statutory approach and a case approach. The first research result is the Legal Basis for Hindu Marriage in Bali, which refers to Article 28 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, Article 1 & Article 2 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments Based on Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Rigveda X. 85.23 & Rigveda VI.15.19. The second research result, namely the Legality of Virtual Hindu Marriages in the Perspective of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, is that national norms do not regulate virtual marriages so it can be said to be an empty norm. Viewed from custom, tradition and religion, there are no rules regarding virtual marriage because it can be seen that the conditions that must be met to make a Hindu marriage in Bali valid are one of the witnesses in the mabyakala (wiwaha) ceremony which involves 3 witnesses or Tri Upasaksi, namely the witness god, human witnesses, and bhuta witnesses.
Perlindungan Whistleblower sebagai Pilar Penegakan Hukum Anti-Korupsi: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia, Filipina, dan Australia Alhakim, Abdurrakhman; Tan, David
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p12

Abstract

Legal protection for whistleblowers constitutes a crucial element in efforts to combat corruption. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the legal frameworks in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Australia in providing protection for whistleblowers. A normative legal research method and a comparative approach were employed. The study examined key regulations and complementary legal instruments in each country. The findings reveal that Australia has the most comprehensive and structured legal framework for whistleblower protection. Indonesia possesses an adequate normative foundation but lacks a consistent and integrated system. The Philippines, meanwhile, does not yet have explicit legal provisions safeguarding whistleblowers. These findings highlight that all three countries continue to face various challenges in ensuring adequate legal protection. The study recommends strengthening regulatory systems and enhancing institutional support to ensure that the courage of whistleblowers does not lead to vulnerability, but rather becomes an integral part of the social control mechanism in law enforcement. Perlindungan hukum terhadap whistleblower menjadi bagian penting dalam upaya pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas kerangka hukum di Indonesia, Filipina, dan Australia dalam memberikan perlindungan terhadap whistleblower. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pendekatan komparatif. Kajian dilakukan terhadap regulasi utama dan perangkat hukum pelengkap yang berlaku di masing-masing negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Australia memiliki sistem perlindungan paling menyeluruh dan terstruktur dalam peraturan perundang-undangannya. Indonesia telah memiliki dasar normatif yang cukup, tetapi belum membentuk sistem yang konsisten dan terintegrasi. Filipina belum memiliki pengaturan hukum yang secara eksplisit melindungi whistleblower. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa ketiga negara masih menghadapi berbagai hambatan dalam memastikan perlindungan hukum yang memadai. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan sistem regulasi dan dukungan kelembagaan yang lebih responsif, agar keberanian pelapor tidak berujung pada kerentanan, melainkan menjadi bagian penting dari mekanisme kontrol sosial dalam penegakan hukum.
Legalisasi Supremasi Eksekutif? Studi Sosio-Legal terhadap Reformasi Kementerian di Indonesia Risky, Saiful; Ramadhan, Febriansyah; Esfandiari, Fitria
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p03

Abstract

This article will explore how the amendment to Law No. 39/2008 on State Ministries that removed the maximum limit on the number of ministries, has significant constitutional and political implications for Indonesia’s presidential system. This study employs a socio-legal or interdisciplinary approach by analyzing the normative aspects of legislation alongside the political dynamics behind the policy revision. The findings indicate that the removal of ministerial limits is primarily driven by political accommodation rather than administrative efficiency. This increasingly expansive governance model risks creating a bloated bureaucracy that lacks effectiveness in executing governmental functions. The findings indicate that without a limit on the number of ministries, the institutional precedent is difficult to reverse due to mechanisms of path dependency, which reinforce resistance to bureaucratic reform. To address the risk of constitutional regression and the weakening of the principle of checks and balances, this article recommends policy reconstruction by revising the Law on State Ministries to explicitly set a maximum of 34 ministries, as well as a limited amendment to Article 17 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia so that the restriction is constitutionally enshrined. In this way, the reform is expected to uphold constitutional supremacy, improve bureaucratic efficiency, and maintain institutional stability within the framework of good governance. Artikel ini akan mengeksplorasi perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2008 tentang Kementerian Negara yang menghapus batas maksimal jumlah kementerian menimbulkan implikasi konstitusional dan politik yang signifikan dalam sistem pemerintahan presidensial Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan socio-legal atau interdisipliner antara ilmu hukum dan ilmu politik, dengan menganalisis aspek normatif dalam peraturan perundang-undangan serta dinamika politik di balik revisi kebijakan tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penghapusan batas jumlah kementerian lebih didasarkan pada akomodasi kepentingan politik daripada pertimbangan efisiensi administrasi. Model tata kelola pemerintahan yang semakin ekspansif ini berisiko menciptakan birokrasi yang gemuk dan kurang efektif dalam menjalankan fungsi pemerintahan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa tanpa pembatasan jumlah kementerian, 'preseden institusional' sulit dibalik akibat mekanisme 'path dependency', yang memperkuat resistensi terhadap reformasi birokrasi. Untuk mengatasi risiko 'constitutional regression' dan melemahnya prinsip 'checks and balances', artikel ini merekomendasikan rekonstruksi kebijakan melalui revisi UU Kementerian Negara yang menetapkan batas maksimal 34 kementerian secara eksplisit, serta amendemen terbatas Pasal 17 UUD NRI 1945 agar pembatasan bersifat konstitusional. Dengan demikian, reformasi ini diharapkan menegakkan supremasi konstitusi, meningkatkan efisiensi birokrasi, dan menjaga stabilitas kelembagaan dalam kerangka good governance.

Page 67 of 67 | Total Record : 664

 63   64   65   66   67 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue