cover
Contact Name
Fuad Mustafid
Contact Email
fuad.mustafid@uin-suka.ac.id
Phone
+6281328769779
Journal Mail Official
asy.syirah@uin-suka.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
ISSN : 08548722     EISSN : 24430757     DOI : 10.14421/ajish
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
2nd Floor Room 205 Faculty of Sharia and Law, State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga, Marsda Adisucipto St., Yogyakarta 55281
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 616 Documents
Techno-Sharia in the Age of Intangible Assets: Digital Inheritance of Metaverse Property Ahmad Muntazar; Syafruddin Syafruddin; Oneng Nurul Bariyah; Fouad Larhzizer
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 60 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v60i1.1674

Abstract

The emergence of intangible digital assets within the Metaverse, notably Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) adhering to the ERC-721 and ERC-1155 standards, presents significant challenges to Islamic inheritance law (farāʾiḍ), which has traditionally been predicated on tangible notions of property. Situated within the nascent discourse of Techno-Sharia, this study undertakes a reconstruction of the classical concept of māl (property) to ascertain the legal status and inheritability of such digital assets. Utilizing a qualitative, library-based methodology, the research employs a taḥlīlī (analytical) and muqāran (comparative) fiqh approach to deconstruct juristic criteria of māl and apply them to blockchain-based assets. The findings indicate that Metaverse assets satisfy the three fundamental conditions of māl: recognized market value (al-taqawwum), permissible utility (al-manfaʿah), and exclusive control through cryptographic ownership, which functions as a contemporary analogue to al-ḥiyāzah (possession). Accordingly, these assets qualify as part of the tirkah (inheritable estate). Nonetheless, their inclusion introduces considerable challenges for the implementation of farāʾiḍ, including inaccessible wallets resulting from lost private keys (rendering assets māl dāʾiʿ), valuation volatility (taqwīm), indivisibility (qismah), and conflicts between immutable smart contracts and Sharia-based distribution principles. This study proposes the adoption of fractionalized NFTs (fNFTs) and the development of Sharia-compliant smart contracts to ensure accessibility, validity, and justice in digital inheritance practices.
Between European and Muslim-Majority Civil Law Systems: Comparative Supervisory Liability in France, Iraq, and Egypt Hozan Abdulmohsin Abdullah Atroshi
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 60 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v60i1.1677

Abstract

This study examines the legal foundations of supervisory liability under French civil law through a comparative analysis with Iraqi and Egyptian legislation. It centers on the evolution of liability for the actions of others, with particular emphasis on Article 1242 of the French Civil Code, and assesses the shift in French jurisprudence from a restrictive interpretation toward the acknowledgment of a general principle of liability, especially following the seminal Blieck decision of 1991. The research explores whether supervisory liability is predicated on presumed fault, risk theory, guarantee, representation, or substitution, and juxtaposes these bases with Articles 218, 219, and 191 of the Iraqi Civil Code and Article 173 of the Egyptian Civil Code. Employing a doctrinal and analytical methodology, the study examines statutory provisions, judicial rulings, and prominent juristic opinions across the three legal systems. The findings reveal that French and Egyptian law primarily adopt a rebuttable presumption of fault as the foundation of supervisory liability, whereas Iraqi law integrates presumed fault with aspects of guarantee-based responsibility derived from Islamic jurisprudence.
Green Fatwa Studies in Global Discourses: Trends and Pathways for the Sustainable Development Agenda Ahmad Izudin
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 60 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v60i1.1685

Abstract

This scoping review explores the trends and pathways in international academic research on green fatwas over the last two decades, from 2007 to 2026. Its goal is to chart how related subjects—especially those indirectly connected to ecological fiqh (fiqh al-bī’ah)—support the wider sustainable development agenda. The study systematically analyzes 37 articles through a comparative review of influential international literature indexed in major academic databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, as well as from prominent academic publishers including Springer Nature, Taylor & Francis, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, and SAGE Publications. The results reveal a dynamic but uneven progression marked by thematic diversity, methodological differences, and regional concentration, suggesting that scholarship on green fatwas remains fragmented. Although the field increasingly engages with sustainability discussions, it is still largely framed within normative and ethical perspectives grounded in Islamic legal and theological traditions. Importantly, the study identifies five main thematic clusters that represent key pathways in the field’s development, each linked to specific aspects of the sustainable development agenda: environmental ethics, governance, socio-religious movements, Islamic economic tools, and eco-literacy. As a result, this review offers a structured overview of trends and intellectual developments while emphasizing the need to evolve green fatwas research from a mainly normative focus toward a more practical, evidence-based, and policy-oriented approach within global sustainability governance.
The Limits of Fatwa Discourse on Women’s Rights in Divorce: A Gender Justice Perspective from Indonesia and Jordan Iffatul Umniati Ismail; Yadya Alia Muhammad Shah; Juwika Afrita
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 60 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v60i1.1645

Abstract

This article investigates the construction of women’s rights in divorce within contemporary Islamic legal discourse through a comparative analysis of fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) and Jordanian Dār al-Iftā’ (JDI). The study is prompted by the rising number of women initiating divorce and the increasing incidence of children lacking adequate financial support from their fathers, with mothers often assuming this responsibility. Employing a normative socio-legal methodology, the research utilizes qualitative content analysis of fatwa documents in conjunction with relevant legal frameworks. The analysis is informed by the principles of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah and perspectives on Islamic gender justice. The findings reveal that both MUI and JDI predominantly adopt a literalist approach grounded in classical fiqh traditions. Although women’s rights in divorce are acknowledged, they are generally framed within established doctrinal boundaries and are not consistently articulated from a broader rights-based perspective. Notably, the paternal obligation to provide financial support for children is not always explicitly emphasized within fatwa discourse. In contrast, national legal systems—such as Indonesia’s Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and Jordan’s Personal Status Law—offer clearer and more enforceable provisions. This study underscores the necessity of harmonizing religious interpretations with legal frameworks to enhance the effective protection of women’s and children’s rights.
Sharia, Women, and Digital Financial Violence: Examining Verbal Sexual Harassment in Illegal Online Lending Collection Waldi Nopriansyah; Muzalifah Muzalifah; Jati Kasuma Ali; Ulih Muslihudin; Mohammed Salim Salim
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 60 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v60i1.1680

Abstract

Illegal online lending has emerged as a prominent aspect of digital financial services, providing rapid credit access while simultaneously engendering significant legal and ethical challenges. A particularly concerning consequence is the incidence of verbal sexual harassment targeted at women. This study aims to investigate the practice of illegal online lending and the employment of verbal sexual harassment against women as a method of abusive debt collection. The research is grounded in secondary data sources, including legal documents, regulations, and pertinent literature. The analysis utilizes a synchronistic-comparative and descriptive-analytical framework to evaluate the congruence between legal norms, Islamic legal principles, and human dignity, with particular emphasis on maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah (objectives of Islamic law). The findings reveal that verbal sexual harassment within illegal online lending constitutes a systematic form of coercive collection, encompassing intimidation, threats, and the exploitation of personal data. It highlights a socio-normative disparity between the rapid expansion of digital financial services and the insufficiency of effective legal safeguards, thereby facilitating the exploitation of vulnerable populations. From the perspective of maqāṣid, such practices are unequivocally prohibited and may be classified as jarīmah (crimes) subject to ta‘zīr (discretionary punishment), as they contravene the principles of human dignity (karāmah insāniyyah) and the prohibition of harm (mafsadah). This study contributes by offering a juridical framework integrating positive and Islamic law and promoting ethical governance through a digital Sharia audit.
The Future of Islamic Economic Law in Indonesia: Reconstructing Legal Authority and Regulatory Adaptability Khoirul Anwar; Fahadil Amin Al Hasan
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 60 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v60i1.1682

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Islamic economics in Indonesia necessitates a robust legal framework that guarantees legal certainty while remaining adaptable to the ongoing evolution of Islamic financial products. The Compilation of Islamic Economic Law (KHES), promulgated through Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 2 of 2008, currently functions as the primary substantive legal reference for resolving disputes in Islamic economics. However, its status as a judicial regulation and its product-specific substantive design raise concerns regarding its normative legitimacy and regulatory flexibility. This study investigates the adequacy of PERMA as a legal instrument for KHES and explores how its substantive provisions might be restructured through a principle-based regulatory approach. Utilizing normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative methodologies, the study applies Kelsen’s Legal Hierarchy Theory—operationalized through three criteria: formal status, functional role, and legitimacy contestation—to evaluate KHES’s juridical adequacy. Additionally, it employs principle-based regulation to assess its substantive framework. The findings suggest that reinforcing KHES necessitates the establishment of a dedicated statutory instrument rather than continued reliance solely on PERMA. Furthermore, its substantive reconstruction should be founded on universal ‘aqd principles instead of product-specific regulations. The originality of this study resides in its integration of legal hierarchy theory and principle-based regulation within a unified analytical framework, an approach not previously undertaken in KHES scholarship. This integration offers a model that enhances legal certainty, accommodates financial innovation, and supports the long-term sustainability of Indonesia’s Islamic economic legal system.