cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Fuad Mustafid
Contact Email
fuad.mustafid@uin-suka.ac.id
Phone
+6281328769779
Journal Mail Official
asy.syirah@uin-suka.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
ISSN : 08548722     EISSN : 24430757     DOI : 10.14421/ajish
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
2nd Floor Room 205 Faculty of Sharia and Law, State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga, Marsda Adisucipto St., Yogyakarta 55281
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 601 Documents
 57   58   59   60   61 
Bridging Justice Systems: Asset Confiscation in Anti-Corruption Law and Islamic Jurisprudence Tedhalosa, Adhing; Nugroho, Hibnu; Raharjo, Agus; Syahputra, Azmi
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 59 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v59i1.1611

Abstract

Under Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Law, asset confiscation is treated as a civil and in personam matter, further impeded by parliamentary opposition to the Asset Forfeiture Bill. This article examines deficiencies in Indonesia’s asset recovery framework through a comparative legal analysis with Islamic jurisprudence. Employing a critical–comparative approach, the study conducts a normative analysis of Law No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication, Law No. 8 of 2010 on Money Laundering, the Draft Asset Forfeiture Bill, and Law No. 1 of 2023 (the new Criminal Code), alongside Islamic legal sources. Anchored in the Islamic principle of radd al-maẓālim (the restitution of unjustly acquired wealth), the findings reveal that corruption encompasses both criminal and civil aspects. The study contends that the adoption of a non-conviction-based forfeiture mechanism—underpinned by a calibrated reverse burden of proof and robust judicial safeguards—could substantially improve Indonesia’s capacity for asset recovery. In practical terms, this research highlights the imperative of enacting comprehensive asset confiscation legislation as a fundamental component of Indonesia’s anti-corruption reforms.

Page 61 of 61 | Total Record : 601

 57   58   59   60   61 

Filter by Year

2008 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 59 No 1 (2025) Vol 58 No 2 (2024) Vol 58 No 1 (2024) Vol 57 No 2 (2023) Vol 57 No 1 (2023) Vol 56, No 2 (2022) Vol 56 No 2 (2022) Vol 56, No 1 (2022) Vol 56 No 1 (2022) Vol 55 No 2 (2021) Vol 55, No 2 (2021) Vol 55, No 1 (2021) Vol 55 No 1 (2021) Vol 54, No 2 (2020) Vol 54 No 2 (2020) Vol 54, No 1 (2020) Vol 54 No 1 (2020) Vol 53, No 2 (2019) Vol 53 No 2 (2019) Vol 53 No 1 (2019) Vol 53, No 1 (2019) Vol 52 No 2 (2018) Vol 52, No 2 (2018) Vol 52, No 1 (2018) Vol 52 No 1 (2018) Vol 51, No 2 (2017) Vol 51 No 2 (2017) Vol 51, No 2 (2017) Vol 51 No 1 (2017) Vol 51, No 1 (2017) Vol 50 No 2 (2016) Vol 50, No 2 (2016) Vol 50 No 1 (2016) Vol 50, No 1 (2016) Vol 49 No 2 (2015) Vol 49, No 2 (2015) Vol 49, No 1 (2015) Vol 49, No 1 (2015) Vol 49 No 1 (2015) Vol 48, No 2 (2014) Vol 48 No 2 (2014) Vol 48 No 1 (2014) Vol 48, No 1 (2014) Vol 47, No 2 (2013) Vol 47 No 2 (2013) Vol 47 No 1 (2013) Vol 47, No 1 (2013) Vol 46 No 2 (2012) Vol 46, No 2 (2012) Vol 46, No 1 (2012) Vol 46 No 1 (2012) Vol 45, No 2 (2011) Vol 45 No 2 (2011) Vol 45, No 1 (2011) Vol 45 No 1 (2011) Vol 44 No 2 (2010) Vol 44 No 1 (2010) Vol 43 No 2 (2009) Vol 43, No 2 (2009) Vol 43, No 1 (2009) Vol 43 No 1 (2009) Vol 42, No 2 (2008) Vol 42 No 2 (2008) Vol 42 No 1 (2008) Vol 42, No 1 (2008) More Issue