cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
REINWARDTIA
Published by Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 1,467 Documents
 53   54   55   56   57 
THE FERN-GENUS ARCYPTERIS UNDERWOOD (Dictyopteris PresI sensu Fee) R. E. HOLTTUM
REINWARDTIA Vol 1, No 2 (1951): vol.1 no.2
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v1i2.1057

Abstract

1. The genus Arcypteris Underw. (Dictyopteris Presl sensu Pee) is maintained as different from Tectaria Cav. and redefined. It is considered very closely related to Pleocnemia Presl. 2. Four species are recognized. 3. The following new combinations are made: Arcypteris irregularis (Presl) Holttum (basinym: Polypodium irregulare Presl), A. macrodonta (Fee) Holttum (basi- nym: Dictyopteris macrodonta Presl ex Fee), A. brongniariii (Bory) Holttum (basinym: Polypodium brongniartii Bory), and A. gigantea (Ces.) Holttum (basinym: Nephrodium giganteum Ces.). 4s. Reductions to synonymy are: Aspidium difforme Blume to Arcypteris irre- gularis (Presl) Holtt., and Polypodium pteroides Presl to A. brongniartii (Bory) Holtt.
A NEW SPECIES OF FREYCINETIA (PANDANACEAE) FROM JAMBI, SUMATRA, INDONESIA Elizabeth Anita Widjaja; Nursahara Pasaribu; Arief Hidayat
REINWARDTIA Vol 12, No 5 (2009): Vol. 12, No. 5
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v12i5.85

Abstract

WIDJAJA, E.A., PASARIBU, N., HIDAYAT, A. 2009. A new species Freycinetia (Pandanaceae) from Jambi, Sumatra, Indonesia. Reinwardtia 12 (5): 441–442. — Freycinetia berbakensis Widjaja, Pasaribu & Hidayat is proposed as a new species.
A new species of Begonia (Begoniaceae) from Sagea Lagoon, Weda Bay, Halmahera Island, North Moluccas, Indonesia Harry Wiriadinata
REINWARDTIA Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Vol. 13 No. 3
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v13i3.447

Abstract

A new species of Begonia sageaensis Wiriadinata (Begoniaceae) from south of Mt. Sohra Ecoregion, Sagea Lagoon, Weda Bay, Halmahera, North Moluccas, Indonesia is described and illustrated. This species close to B. holosericea Teijsm. & Binn. in small herb habit but it differ in red hirsute hairs on both leaf surface and on its petiole, persistence equitant bracts, longer pedicels of male flowers and  fruit has three equal wings with both flat ends.
A CRITICAL STUDY IN THE COMPLEX-POLYMORPHOUS GENUS SCHIMA (THEACEAE) S. BLOEMBERGEN
REINWARDTIA Vol 2, No 1 (1952): vol.2 no.1
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v2i1.1019

Abstract

 1. The author considers the genus Schima monotypic. Its only species, Schima wallichii (DC.) Korth., is subdivided into nine geographically separated subspecies and three varieties.These may be recognised sometimes by one dominating chax*acter,mostly, however, by a complex of characters.Several new combinations are made.2. Yet the variability of most of the subspecies is still often enormous and at first sight appears complex. Thus we may often encounter the polymorphy of the whole species in its subspecies again. It was the striking different percentage-numbers of(phenotypically) about the same characters which turned the scale in favour of the recognition of the subspecies, besides their geographic separation.The attempts made by the author to divide certain resulting complex-polymorphous subspecies into units of still lower rank and to trace correlations with peculiarities of environment such as different heights above sealevel, or with different stages in the age of the trees, failed. 3. On account of these negative results and the above mentioned different percentage-numbers for phenotypically about the same characters, the author came to the conclusion that the most probable explanation is that the variability within the subspecies is just due to Mendel-segregation and nothing else.It looks very much as if one is dealing here with the inheriting of striking characters, each caused by one or only a few polymeric factors, characters which hold their own, just as in panmictlcally propagated populations (by cross-pollination). This explanation, too,makes the striking fact that in some subspecies we find back phenotypically the whole, or part, of the polymorphy of the entire species more understandable, as well as the fact that individuals of different subspecies may agree phenotypically, whereas genotypically they belong to different races (subspecies), Moreover, all these phenomena strongly support the monotypic conception of the genus. 4. The author saw few examples from the area outside Indonesia. However,this does neither influence his monotypic conception of the genus, nor his method of dividing it into units of lower ranks. The study of the scanty amount of specimens,literature, and the drawings seen appeared more than sufficiently convincing. Yet he is not quite certain whether the correct rank was ascribed to some of the lower taxa involved. It would perhaps have been advisable to consider the variety superba and the continental parts of the subspecies oblata and monticola as distinct subspecies.Future consideration of this matter shall have to decide.
RECOVERY OF A LOWLAND DIPTEROCARP FOREST TWENTY TWO YEARS AFTER SELECTIVE LOGGING AT SEKUNDUR, GUNUNG LEUSER NATIONAL PARK, NORTH SUMATRA, INDONESIA Dolly - Priatna; Kuswata - Kartawinata; Rochadi - Abdulhadi
REINWARDTIA Vol 12, No 3 (2006): Vol. 12, No. 3
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v12i3.48

Abstract

PRIATNA, D.; KARTAWINATA, K.; ABDULHADI, R. 2004. Recovery of a lowland dipterocarp forest twenty two years after selective logging at Sekundur, Gunung Leuser National Park, North Sumatra, Indonesia. Reinwardtia 12 (3): 237–255. — A permanent 2-ha plot of lowland forest selectively logged in 1978 at Sekundur, Gunung Leuser National Park,which is also a Biosphere Reserve and a World Heritage Site, North Sumatra,was established and investigated in 1982. It was re-examined in 2000, where remeasurement and reidentification of all trees with DBH =10 cm were made.The areas of gap, building and mature phases of the canopy were also measured and mapped. Within this plot, 133 species, 87 genera and 39 families were recorded, with the total number of trees of 1145 or density of 572.5/ha. Euphorbiaceae was the richest family with 18 species (13.5 % of the total) and total number of trees of 248 (21.7 % of the total or density of 124 trees/ha.The most important families were Dipterocarpaceae with IV (Importance Value) = 52.0, followed by Euphorbiaceae with IV = 51.8. The most prevalent species was Shorea kunstleri (Dipterocarpaceae) with IV =24.4, followed by Macaranga diepenhorstii (Euphorbiaceae) with IV = 12.4. They were the species with highest density, 34 trees/ha and 23.5 trees/ha, respectively. During the period of 18 years there has been no shift in the richest families, most importantfamilies and most important species. Euphorbiaceae was the richest family and Dipterocarpaceae was the most important family, with Shorea kunstleri as the most important species with highest importance value throughout the period. The number of species increased from 127 to 133 with increase in density by 36.8% , from 418.5 trees/ha to 572.5 trees/ha. The mortality was 25.57 % or 1.4 % per year. The diameter class distribution indicated that the forest recovery has not been complete. Trees were small, comprising 67.6 % with diameters of 10-20 cm and only two trees had diameters of 100 cm, i.e.Melanochyla caesia and Lithocarpus urceolaris. Based on the basal area of all species, the logged-over forest at Sekundur is estimated to reach the situation similar to undisturbed primary forest in 56 years after logging, but on the basis of basal area of Dipterocarpaceae such condition could be achieved in 172 years.The canopy has not fully recovered and the complete closure of gaps is estimated to take 53 years since the logging started. The canopy consisted of gap phase (24.6 %), building phase (19.7 %) and mature phase (55.7 %). During the period of 18 years the tree mortality was 25.57 % or the rate of 1.4 %/year.Euphorbiaceae experienced the highest mortality, particularly among the trees with diameters of 10-20 cm.Mortality decreased with the increase of diameters.During the same period 520 new trees of 16 species were recruited.The densities of 53 % of the species experienced changes of only one tree or no changes at all.Drastic increase in tree population occurred in light demanding species,such as Baccaurea kunstleri, Endospermum diadenum,Mallotus penangensis,Sapium baccatum and Macaranga diepenhorstii .
FLORISTIC DIVERSITY AND STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MANGROVE FOREST OF RAJA AMPAT, WEST PAPUA, INDONESIA Suhardjono Prawiroatmodjo; Kuswata Kartawinata
REINWARDTIA Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Vol. 14 No. 1
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v14i1.413

Abstract

We studied  the floristic compostion and structure of mangrove forests and mangrove species distribution at the Raja Ampat Regency, West Papua  We sampled the forests using (10x10 m) quadrats to record trees and saplings  laid out contiguously along 9 transects of 60 – 450 m long,  stretching perpendicularly from the coastlines or riverbanks to the landward borders. Seedlings were sampled using a 1x1 m subplot nested in each quadrat.  The transects were established on the islands of  Batanta (6), Salawati  (2). and Waigeo (1).  Within quadrats and transects we recorded 17 mangrove species of trees with density of 768 stems/ha and basal area of  37.82 m2/ha and tree height of  10 – 30 m.   Two species possessed  the highest importance value  (IV) , frequency, density and basal area  i.e. Rhizophora apiculata (IV=168.06 %) and  Bruguiera gymnorrhiza (IV=67.18).  They also showed the highest similarity in their distribution,  indicating highest degree of association.  The mangrove at Raja Ampat may, therefore,  be designated as the Rhizophora apiculata-Bruguiera gymnorrhiza Association. Other species with highest degree of distributional similarities but with low densities, basal areas and importance values were Barringtonia racemosa, Excoecaria agallocha, Hibiscus tiliaceus, Inocarpus fagifera,  Lumnitzera littorea and Sterculia shillinglawii,  of which four of them are not  true mangrove species, usually growing on less saline and more solid soils. The floristic composition of the transects in the three islands showed relatively high similarities of about 70 % and at higher similarities the transects in Batanta Island formed four groups, Salawati Island two groups and Waigeo Island one group.The Bray-Curtis polar ordination  resulted in four groups  of transects, which were related to the habitat  conditions and the length of the transects. Species diversity in the islands was very low, where the  Shannon diversity index  ranged  from  0.19 to 0.64 giving  the average  of 0.42. Rhizophora apiculata and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza  were gregenerating well and in the future they will remain dominant.  The mangrove forests of the Raja Ampat Islands by any means should be maintained as green belts and  protected from all kinds of destruction and should be made into conservation areas in order to sustain its ability to provide ecological services  and non-destructive economic benefits.
FLORAE MALESIANAE PRAECURSORES XLVII. CENSUS OF MALESIAN CASTANOPSIS (FAGACEAE) E. SOEPADMO; M. JACOBS
REINWARDTIA Vol 7, No 4 (1968): vol.7 no.4
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v7i4.981

Abstract

This paper deals with the names and typication of the 34 species recognized in Malesia. Specimens important for the knowledge of the distribution of each species have been cited with their locality. Indexes to names and to all examined specimens are given. Ten new species are described: Castanopsis clemensii, densinervia, endertii, microphylla,, oligoneura, oviformis, paucispina, peduneulata, psilophylla, all from Borneo, and johorensis from Malaya. C. hypophoenieea and C. lucida are new combinations based on Quercus hypophoenieea v. Seem, and Alseodaphne lucida Nees in Wall, respectively. Castanopsis ebneri and woodii are reduced to evansii, hullettii to lucida, pachycarpa to rhamnifolia, conspersispina, to tungurrut, dispersispina to hypophoenieea, ridleyi partly to tungurrut and partly to megacarpa, kinabaluensis to foxworthyi, pearsonii to mottleyana, junghuhnii and schlenkerae to acuniinatissima. Castanopsis selangorensis A. Cam. is regarded as a doubtful species. The number of endemic species is for Malaya 5, Borneo 11, the Philippines 1; the total number of species, is for Sumatra 11, Malaya 17, Java 4, Borneo 20, the Philippines 4, Celebes 2, the Moluccas 1, New Guinea 1, the Lesser Sunda Islands none.
THE GENUS LASIANTHUS (RUBIACEAE) IN WAWONII ISLAND, SOUTHEAST SULAWESI, INDONESIA T.Rugayah Rugayah; Siti Sunarti
REINWARDTIA Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Vol 16 No. 2
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v16i2.3346

Abstract

RUGAYAH & SUNARTI, S. 2017. The genus Lasianthus (Rubiaceae) in Wawonii Island, Sountheast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Reinwardtia 16 (2): 97–101. — Recent botanical excursions carried out at Wawonii island, Southeast Sula-wesi yielded two Lasianthus novelties distinct from other Lasianthus species enumerated for Sulawesi. These two new species are described here as Lasianthus wawoniiensis Rugayah & Sunarti and L. macrobracteatus Rugayah & Sunarti. Descriptions and illustrations of the two new species are provided, including an identification key to all Lasianthus species occurring in the area.
THE ANAMORPH OF SARAWAKUS SUCCISUS RIFAI Mien A. Rifai; Triadi Basuki; Kartini Karmadibrata
REINWARDTIA Vol 10, No 2 (1984): vol. 10 No.2
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v10i2.271

Abstract

Single ascospore isolates of Sarawakus succisus Rifai produce a Trichoderma like anamorph. The hypocreaceous nature of the genus Savawakus Lloyd is therefore indicated. A detailed illustrated description of this conidial state is presented.
TRIADODAPHNE, A NEW LAURACEOUS GENUS FROM BORNEO a. j. g. h. kostermans
REINWARDTIA Vol 9, No 1 (1974): Vol.9 no.1
Publisher : Research Center for Biology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/reinwardtia.v9i1.902

Abstract

An illustrated description of the new monotypic genus Triadodaphne myristicoidee is presented, and its similarity to Beilsehmiedia, Crytocarya and Endiandra is discussed.

Page 55 of 147 | Total Record : 1467

 53   54   55   56   57 

Filter by Year

1950 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Reinwardtia Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Volume 23, No 1 (2024): Reinwardtia Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024) Vol 23, No 2 (2024): Reinwardtia Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024) Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Volume 22, No 2 (2023): Reinwardtia Vol 22, No 1 (2023): Volume 22, No 1 (2023): Reinwardtia Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023) Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Reinwardtia Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022) Vol 21, No 1 (2022): Reinwardtia Vol 20, No 1 (2021): Vol. 20 No. 1 Vol 20, No 2 (2021): Reinwardtia Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021) Vol 19, No 2 (2020): Vol.19 No.2 Vol 19, No 1 (2020): Vol.19 No.1 Vol. 19 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020) Vol 18, No 2 (2019): Vol.18 No.2 Vol 18, No 1 (2019): Vol.18 No.1 Vol 18, No 1 (2019): Vol.18 No.1 Vol. 18 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2019) Vol 17, No 2 (2018): Vol.17 No.2 Vol 17, No 2 (2018): Vol.17 No.2 Vol 17, No 1 (2018): Vol.17 No.1 Vol 17, No 1 (2018): Vol.17 No.1 Vol. 17 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018) Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Vol 16 No. 2 Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Vol 16 No. 2 Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Vol.16 No.1 Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Vol.16 No.1 Vol. 16 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017) Vol 15, No 2 (2016): Vol.15 No.2 Vol 15, No 2 (2016): Vol.15 No.2 Vol 15, No 1 (2016): Vol.15 No.1 Vol 15, No 1 (2016): Vol.15 No.1 Vol. 15 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2016) Vol 14, No 2 (2015): Vol.14 No.2 Vol 14, No 2 (2015): Vol.14 No.2 Vol. 14 No. 2 (2015) Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Vol. 14 No. 1 Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Vol. 14 No. 1 Vol. 14 No. 1 (2014) Vol 13, No 5 (2013): Vol. 13, No. 5 Vol 13, No 5 (2013): Vol. 13, No. 5 Vol. 13 No. 5 (2013) Vol 13, No 4 (2012): Vol. 13 no. 4 Vol 13, No 4 (2012): Vol. 13 no. 4 Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Vol. 13 No. 3 Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Vol. 13 No. 3 Vol. 13 No. 4 (2012) Vol. 13 No. 3 (2012) Vol 13, No 2 (2010): Vol. 13 No. 2 Vol 13, No 2 (2010): Vol. 13 No. 2 Vol. 13 No. 2 (2010) Vol 13, No 1 (2009): Vol. 13 No. 1 Vol 13, No 1 (2009): Vol. 13 No. 1 Vol 12, No 5 (2009): Vol. 12, No. 5 Vol 12, No 5 (2009): Vol. 12, No. 5 Vol. 13 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 12 No. 5 (2009) Vol 12, No 4 (2008): Vol. 12, No. 4 Vol 12, No 4 (2008): Vol. 12, No. 4 Vol. 12 No. 4 (2008) Vol 12, No 3 (2006): Vol. 12, No. 3 Vol 12, No 3 (2006): Vol. 12, No. 3 Vol. 12 No. 3 (2006) Vol 12, No 2 (2004): Vol. 12, No. 2 Vol 12, No 2 (2004): Vol. 12, No. 2 Vol. 12 No. 2 (2004) Vol 12, No 1 (2002): Vol. 12, No. 1 Vol 12, No 1 (2002): Vol. 12, No. 1 Vol. 12 No. 1 (2002) Vol 11, No 5 (2000): Vol. 11 No. 5 Vol 11, No 5 (2000): Vol. 11 No. 5 Vol. 11 No. 5 (2000) Vol 11, No 4 (1999): Vol. 11 No. 4 Vol 11, No 4 (1999): Vol. 11 No. 4 Vol. 11 No. 4 (1999) Vol 11, No 3 (1998): Vol. 11 No. 3 Vol 11, No 3 (1998): Vol. 11 No. 3 Vol. 11 No. 3 (1998) Vol 11, No 2 (1997): Vol. 11 No. 2 Vol 11, No 2 (1997): Vol. 11 No. 2 Vol. 11 No. 2 (1997) Vol 11, No 1 (1992): Vol. 11 No. 1 Vol 11, No 1 (1992): Vol. 11 No. 1 Vol. 11 No. 1 (1992) Vol 10, No 5 (1988): vol. 10 No.5 Vol 10, No 5 (1988): vol. 10 No.5 Vol 10, No 4 (1988): vol. 10 No.4 Vol 10, No 4 (1988): vol. 10 No.4 Vol. 10 No. 5 (1988) Vol. 10 No. 4 (1988) Vol 10, No 3 (1987): vol. 10 No.3 Vol 10, No 3 (1987): vol. 10 No.3 Vol. 10 No. 3 (1987) Vol 10, No 2 (1984): vol. 10 No.2 Vol 10, No 2 (1984): vol. 10 No.2 Vol. 10 No. 2 (1984) Vol 10, No 1 (1982): vol. 10 No.1 Vol 10, No 1 (1982): vol. 10 No.1 Vol. 10 No. 1 (1982) Vol 9, No 4 (1980): vol.9 no.4 Vol 9, No 4 (1980): vol.9 no.4 Vol. 9 No. 4 (1980) Vol 9, No 3 (1977): vol.9 no.3 Vol 9, No 3 (1977): vol.9 no.3 Vol. 9 No. 3 (1977) Vol 9, No 2 (1975): vol.9 no.2 Vol 9, No 2 (1975): vol.9 no.2 Vol. 9 No. 2 (1975) Vol 9, No 1 (1974): Vol.9 no.1 Vol 9, No 1 (1974): Vol.9 no.1 Vol 8, No 4 (1974): vol.8 no.4 Vol 8, No 4 (1974): vol.8 no.4 Vol. 9 No. 1 (1974) Vol. 8 No. 4 (1974) Vol 8, No 3 (1972): vol.8 no.3 Vol 8, No 3 (1972): vol.8 no.3 Vol 8, No 2 (1972): vol.8 no.2 Vol 8, No 2 (1972): vol.8 no.2 Vol. 8 No. 3 (1972) Vol. 8 No. 2 (1972) Vol 8, No 1 (1970): vol.8 no.1 Vol 8, No 1 (1970): vol.8 no.1 Vol. 8 No. 1 (1970) Vol 7, No 5 (1969): vol 7.no.5 Vol 7, No 5 (1969): vol 7.no.5 Vol. 7 No. 5 (1969) Vol 7, No 4 (1968): vol.7 no.4 Vol 7, No 4 (1968): vol.7 no.4 Vol. 7 No. 4 (1968) Vol 7, No 3 (1966): vol.7 no.3 Vol 7, No 3 (1966): vol.7 no.3 Vol. 7 No. 3 (1966) Vol 7, No 2 (1965): vol.7 no.2 Vol 7, No 2 (1965): vol.7 no.2 Vol 7, No 1 (1965): vol.7 no.1 Vol 7, No 1 (1965): vol.7 no.1 Vol. 7 No. 2 (1965) Vol. 7 No. 1 (1965) Vol 6, No 4 (1963): vol.6 no. 4 Vol 6, No 4 (1963): vol.6 no. 4 Vol. 6 No. 4 (1963) Vol 6, No 3 (1962): vol.6 no. 3 Vol 6, No 3 (1962): vol.6 no. 3 Vol 6, No 2 (1962): vol.6 no. 2 Vol 6, No 2 (1962): vol.6 no. 2 Vol. 6 No. 3 (1962) Vol. 6 No. 2 (1962) Vol 6, No 1 (1961): vol.6 no. 1 Vol 6, No 1 (1961): vol.6 no. 1 Vol 5, No 4 (1961): vol.5 no.4 Vol 5, No 4 (1961): vol.5 no.4 Vol. 6 No. 1 (1961) Vol. 5 No. 4 (1961) Vol 5, No 3 (1960): vol.5 no.3 Vol 5, No 3 (1960): vol.5 no.3 Vol 5, No 2 (1960): vol.5 no.2 Vol 5, No 2 (1960): vol.5 no.2 Vol. 5 No. 3 (1960) Vol. 5 No. 2 (1960) Vol 5, No 1 (1959): vol.5 no.1 Vol 5, No 1 (1959): vol.5 no.1 Vol 4, No 4 (1959): vol.4 no.4 Vol 4, No 4 (1959): vol.4 no.4 Vol. 5 No. 1 (1959) Vol. 4 No. 4 (1959) Vol 4, No 3 (1958): vol.4 no.3 Vol 4, No 3 (1958): vol.4 no.3 Vol. 4 No. 3 (1958) Vol 4, No 2 (1957): vol.4 no.2 Vol 4, No 2 (1957): vol.4 no.2 Vol. 4 No. 2 (1957) Vol 4, No 1 (1956): vol.4 no.1 Vol 4, No 1 (1956): vol.4 no.1 Vol 3, No 4 (1956): vol.3 no.4 Vol 3, No 4 (1956): vol.3 no.4 Vol 3, No 3 (1956): vol.3 no.3 Vol 3, No 3 (1956): vol.3 no.3 Vol. 4 No. 1 (1956) Vol. 3 No. 4 (1956) Vol. 3 No. 3 (1956) Vol 3, No 2 (1955): vol.3 no.2 Vol 3, No 2 (1955): vol.3 no.2 Vol. 3 No. 2 (1955) Vol 3, No 1 (1954): vol.3 no.1 Vol 3, No 1 (1954): vol.3 no.1 Vol 2, No 3 (1954): vol.2 no.3 Vol 2, No 3 (1954): vol.2 no.3 Vol. 3 No. 1 (1954) Vol. 2 No. 3 (1954) Vol 2, No 2 (1953): vol.2 no.2 Vol 2, No 2 (1953): vol.2 no.2 Vol. 2 No. 2 (1953) Vol 2, No 1 (1952): vol.2 no.1 Vol 2, No 1 (1952): vol.2 no.1 Vol 1, No 4 (1952): vol.1 no.4 Vol 1, No 4 (1952): vol.1 no.4 Vol. 2 No. 1 (1952) Vol. 1 No. 4 (1952) Vol 1, No 3 (1951): vol.1 no.3 Vol 1, No 3 (1951): vol.1 no.3 Vol 1, No 2 (1951): vol.1 no.2 Vol 1, No 2 (1951): vol.1 no.2 Vol. 1 No. 3 (1951) Vol. 1 No. 2 (1951) Vol 1, No 1 (1950): vol.1 no.1 Vol 1, No 1 (1950): vol.1 no.1 Vol. 1 No. 1 (1950) More Issue