cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Wisudani Rahmaningtyas
Contact Email
wisudani.rahmaningtyas@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
+6281226410644
Journal Mail Official
eeaj@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Perumahan Ungaran Indah, Jalan Handayani IV nomor 8B, Kelurahan Nyatnyono, Kecamatan Ungaran Barat, Kabupaten Semarang
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Economic Education Analysis Journal
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : 22526544     EISSN : 2502356X     DOI : 10.15294
Core Subject : Economy, Education,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Other
Manuscripts for Economic Education Analysis Journal should fall within one of the following categories: Research in economics education: Original theoretical and empirical studies dealing with the analysis and evaluation of teaching methods, learning attitudes and interests, materials, or processes. Economics content: Substantive issues, new ideas, and research findings in economics that may influence or can be used in the teaching of economics. Economics instruction: Innovations in pedagogy, hardware, materials, and methods for treating traditional and newer subjects. Issues involving the way economics is taught are emphasized. Online: The Online section identifies exemplary material for teaching and learning economics that is interactive or otherwise not conducive to traditional printed-page format. It features noncommercial work by economists and educators who are creating teaching materials using innovative electronic technology. Features and information: Reports on the status and events that influence academic economists (the labor market, status of women and minorities, and developments within graduate and undergraduate programs).
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 54 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal" : 54 Documents clear
PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN KEPALA SEKOLAH, KOMUNIKASI ORGANISASI, MOTIVASI, DAN LINGKUNGAN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA GURU DI SMP NEGERI 16 SEMARANG Puspaningtyas, Gading; Ismiyati, Ismiyati
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kinerja guru yang baik tentunya dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor, seperti kepemimpinan kepala sekolah, komunikasi organisasi, motivasi, dan lingkungan kerja yang ada di SMP Negeri 16 Semarang. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini yaitu tingkat kedisiplinan guru dalam mengumpulkan perangkat pembelajaran masih rendah, hal ini mengakibatkan proses kegiatan belajar menjadi kurang efektif karena materi, media, dan metode yang dibawakan timbul secara spontan, siswa memiliki sedikit pengetahuan tentang kewirausahaan di sekolah, materi belajar pada buku sekolah masih terbatas, dan ruang kantor yang terasa panas dan gelap. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode dokumentasi dan angket. Uji keberartian persamaan regresi dilihat dari uji Fhitung = 22,103 dengan probabilitas sebesar 0,000 < 0,05 sehingga diperoleh Y = 5,502 + 0,121X1 + 0,232X2 + 0,145X3+ 0,116X4. Besarnya pengaruh secara simultan antara kepemimpinan kepala sekolah, komunikasi organisasi, motivasi, dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja guru yaitu 66,8%. Variabel yang memberikan pengaruh paling besar terhadap kinerja guru secara parsial adalah komunikasi organisasi yaitu sebesar 17,47%, sedangkan untuk kepemimpinan kepala sekolah, motivasi, dan lingkungan kerja berpengaruh lebih kecil yaitu masing-masing sebesar 11,69%, 11,35% dan 10,56%.Teacher’s performance is influenced by several factors, such as principal’s leadership, organization communication, motivation, and work environment. The initial observation showed that the problems of the teacher’s performance were: teacher’s discipline to gather the learn program still low, it was ineffective learning process because the material, media, and method were spontaneous, students have a little knowledge about entrepreneurship, the books are still limited, and a part of the teacher’s room was hot and dark. The data were colleted by documentation and questionnaire. The significance of the test equation as calculated from the F test was 22.103 with probability was 0.000 < 0.05, while the results Y = 5,502 + 0,121X1 + 0,232X2 + 0,145X3+ 0,116X4. The simultaneous influence of the principal’s leadership, organization communication, motivation, and work environment toward the teachers performance was 66.8%. The most influential variable toward the teachers performance at SMPN 16 Semarang was organization communication which partially influenced up to 17.47%. Whereas; the principal’s leadership, motivation, and work environment gave lower influence for 11.69%, 11.35%, and 10.56%.
PENGARUH KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK GURU DAN DISIPLIN BELAJAR MELALUI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR Prasetyo, Arif Nur; Kusumantoro, Kusumantoro
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh disiplin kerja, fasilitas kerja, tingkat pendidikan dan kepemimpinan terhadap pengelolaan kearsipan di kantor kecamatan Wiradesa Kabupaten Pekalongan baik secara parsial maupun simultan. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah pegawai kantor kecamatan Wiradesa sebanyak 57 pegawai. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode kuesioner, observasi, dokumentasi dan interview. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan analisis inferensial. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa persamaan garis regresi linier berganda yaitu Y = 34.975 + 0.210X1 + 0.358X2 + 0.472X3 + 0.179X4 + e. Hasil perhitungan menunjukkan besarnya pengaruh secara parsial disiplin kerja sebesar 8.6%, besarnya pengaruh fasilitas kerja sebesar 8.9%, besarnya pengaruh tingkat pendidikan sebesar 10.6%, dan besarnya pengaruh kepemimpinan sebesar 8.7%. Sedangkan secara simultan disiplin kerja, fasilitas kerja, tingkat pendidikan dan kepemimpinan sebesar 79.2%.. Berdasarkan hasil observasi menunjukkan bahwa prestasi belajar kewirausahaan siswa kelas X Tata Niaga SMK N 1 Salatiga kurang optimal. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah adakah pengaruh kompetensi pedagogik dan disiplin belajar secara bersama-sama terhadap prestasi belajar kewirausahaan. Adakah pengaruh positif kompetensi pedagogik dan disiplin belajar serta motivasi belajar terhadap prestasi belajar kewirausahaan. Selanjutnya adakah pengaruh positif kompetensi pedagogik dan disiplin belajar melalui motivasi belajar sebagai variabel intervening terhadap prestasi belajar kewirausahaan.Base observation at SMK N 1 Salatiga, known that haven't all student on ten grade Commerce reach the high score in learning achievement of entrepreneurial. Problem in this research is about influence pedagogic competence of teachers and discipline learning jointly toward learning achievement of entrepreneurial. Pedagogic competence of teachers and discipline learning and learning motivation toward learning achievement of entrepreneurial. Influence Pedagogic competence of teachers and discipline learning through learning motivation as an intervening variable toward learning achievement of entrepreneurial .The population of this study used the entire class of Ten Grade Commerce Student SMK N 1 Salatiga, it consisted of 75 students. This study did not use research sample, but it examined the entire population. The variable in this study was the independent variable of pedagogic competence of teachers (X1), discipline learning (X2), motivation to learn as an intervening variable (Y1) and learning achievement (Y2) as the dependent variable. Data collection methods : documentation and questionnaires or questionnaires. Methods of data analysis was descriptive analysis and analysis of the percentage of test paths ( path analysis ).
PENGARUH KINERJA GURU, DAN PENGGUNAAN FASILITAS BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PRAKARYA DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN SISWA KELAS X SMK NEGERI 02 PEKALONGAN Dirgayana, Arif; Harnanik, Harnanik
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui adakah pengaruh kinerja guru, dan penggunaan fasilitas belajar terhadap hasil belajar prakarya dan kewirausahaan siswa kelas X SMK Negeri 02 Pekalongan. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMK Negeri 02 Pekalongan yang berjumlah 354 siswa dan sampel dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 78 siswa. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan simple random sampling. Variabel dalam penelitian ini adalah variabel bebas yaitu kinerja guru (XI), penggunaan fasilitas belajar (X2), dan hasil belajar (Y) sebagai variabel terikat. Metode pengumpulan data: dokumentasi dan angket. Metode analisis yaitu analisi deskriptif persentase dan analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian diperoleh persaman regresi Y = 14,003 + 0,049X1 + 0,055X2. Secara parsial ada pengaruh positif kinerja guru terhadap hasil belajar sebesar 9,4%, dan penggunaan fasilitas belajar terhadap hasil belajar sebesar 7,4%. Secara simultan ada pengaruh positif kinerja guru, dan penggunaan fasilitas terhadap hasil belajar sebesar 40,1% dan sisanya sebesar 59,9% dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain yang tidak diteliti. Perhitungan secara deskriptif menunjukkan variabel kinerja guru, dan penggunaan fasilitas belajar dalam kriteria baik, sedangkan variabel hasil dalam kriteria sangat baik.This study aims to determine The Influence of Teacher’s Performance, and Learning Facility Towards Learning Result for The Craft and Entrepreneurship Subject X Grade of SMK 02 Pekalongan. The population in this study were all students of X grade of SMK 02 Pekalongan amounting to 354 students and the sample in this study amounted to 78 students. The sampling technique using simple random sampling. The variable in this study is the independent variable is the teacher’s performance (XI), the use of learning facilities (X2), and the achievment (Y) as the dependent variable. Method of data collection: documentation and questionnaires. Methods of analysis, descriptive analysis of the percentage and multiple linear regression analysis. The results obtained by the regression equation Y = 14,003 + 0,049X1 + 0,055X2. Partially teacher’s performance impacts on learning result of the craft and entrepreneurship’s students as many as (9.4 %). While the use of learning facility are partially influenced as many as (7.4 %). Simultaneously there is a positive influence teacher’s performance, and use of learning facility impact on Achievment of 40.1% and the remaining 59.9% is influenced by other factors not examined. Descriptive calculations showed variable teacher’s performance, and use of learning facility in both criteria, while the criterion variable in achievment in excelent criteria.
ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KESIAPAN KERJA SISWA SMK NEGERI 1 WARUREJA TAHUN 2014 Datadiwa, Dito; Widodo, Joko
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kesiapan kerja adalah keseluruhan kondisi individu yang meliputi kematangan fisik, mental dan pengalaman serta adanya kemauan dan kemampuan untuk melaksanakan suatu pekerjaan atau kegiatan. Tujuan penelitian yaitu untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor kesiapan kerja yang dialami siswa SMK Negeri 1 Warureja dan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang dominan. Populasi dalam penelitian ini yaitu seluruh siswa  kelas XII  SMK Negeri 1 Warureja yang berjumlah 264 siswa. Sampel dalam penelitian ini menggunakan proportional random sampling. Jumlah responden ditentukan sebesar 28,30% dari jumlah siswa tiap-tiap kelas yang merupakan hasil perhitungan dari 75/265 x 100 % = 28,30% contohnya kelas XII Akuntansi yang berjumlah 74 di ambil sampel 28,30% yaitu 20 siswa sebagai sampel. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis faktor. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dari 15 variabel mereduksi menjadi 12 variabel yang masing-masing mengelompok menjadi 2 faktor yaitu : 1) pribadi siswa dan lingkungan, 2) potensi diri siswa dan lingkungan. Faktor 1 mampu menjelaskan 47,046 % variasi dan faktor kedua menjelaskan 35,645 % variasi atau kedua faktor mampu menjelaskan 82,690 % variasi dan selebihnya sebesar 17,31 dijelaskan oleh faktor lain yang tidak masuk dalam model. Faktor kesiapan kerja yang dominan yaitu faktor pribadi siswa dan lingkungan melihat nilai kumulatif dari varian sebesar 95,94%Job readiness is the overall condition of an individual which includes physical maturity, mental and experiences,and also the willingness and ability to carry out a task or activity. The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors working readiness experienced by students of SMK Negeri 1 Warureja and to analyze the dominant factors.  The population in this study are all students of class XII SMK Negeri 1 Warureja which totaled 264 students. Sample in this study using proportional random sampling, which is a combination of proportional sampling with random sampling number of respondents was set at 28.30% of the total number of students for each class which is the result of the calculation of the 75/265 x 100% = 28.30% example class Accounting XII numbering 74 in grab samples of 28.30% which is 20 students as the sample. The technique of collecting data using questionnaires and documentation. Techniques of data analysis using factor analysis. The results showed that of the 15 variables reduce to 12 variables, each of which clustered into two factors: 1) personal environment that includes students, 2) self-potential students and environment. Factor 1 is able to explain 47.046% of the variation and the second factor explained 35.645% of the variation or two factors can explain the variation and the remaining 82.690% of 17.31 is explained by other factors not included in the model. Job readiness dominant factors, namely personal factors and environmental students see the value of the cumulative variance of 95.94%.
MENINGKATKAN KEAKTIFAN BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN MEMAHAMI PRINSIP-PRINSIP PENYELENGGARAAN ADMINISTRASI PERKANTORAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN PROBING PROMPTING DI KELAS X AP 1 SMK HIDAYAH SEMARANG Rahmawati, Hasni; Muhsin, Muhsin; Ismiyati, Ismiyati
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Hasil observasi awal menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata keaktifan siswa kelas X AP 1 tergolong rendah yaitu hanya sebesar 52 %. Siswa di kelas tersebut cenderung pasif hanya beberapa siswa yang bertanya dan mengemukakan pendapat pada saat pembelajaran berlangsung. Berdasarkan latar belakang diatas, maka rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X Administrasi Perkantoran 1 SMK Hidayah Semarang yang terdiri dari 18 siswa. Hasil penelitian pada siklus I menunjukkan rata-rata keaktifan siswa sebesar  62,4% dalam kategori cukup aktif, rata-rata hasil belajar siswa sebesar 74,20 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 67%. Untuk hasil penelitian siklus II menunjukkan rata-rata keaktifan siswa sebesar 72% dalam kategori tinggi, rata-rata hasil belajar sebesar 79,62 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 72%. Untuk hasil penelitian siklus III menunjukkan rata-rata keaktifan siswa sebesar 78,88% dalam kategori tinggi, rata-rata hasil belajar sebesar 84,375 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 78%.Based on the initial observation, the data showed that the average students’ activeness of 10th grade students of Office Administration1 was less active, it was only 52%. Students were passive on the learning process because only several students who gave question and delivered arguments during the teaching learning proccess. Based on the background above, the questions of research were; 1) Did the implementations of Probing Prompting learning model improve students’ activeness? 2) The subject of this research was10th grade students of Office Administration I in SMK Hidayah Semarang, they were 18 students.. The data were collected by observation, documentation, and examination. The data were analyzed by classroom action research analysis and linear regression analysis.The result of cycle I showed that the average of students’ activeness was 62.4% which categorized on active enough, the average scor eof study result was 74.20 with classical completeness was 67%. The result of cycle II showed that the average of students’ activeness was 72% which categorized on highly active, the average score of learning result was 79,62 with classical completeness was 72%. The cycle III as the last cycle showed that the average of students’ activeness was 78.88% which categorized on highly active, the average of study result was 84.37 with classical completeness was 78%.
PENGARUH LINGKUNGAN KELUARGA, KESIAPAN BELAJAR, DAN DISIPLIN BELAJAR TERHADAP MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI IPS PADA MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI DI MA. NU RAUDLATUL MUALLIMIN WEDUNG Lutviana, Luluk; Suryani, Nanik
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui adakah pengaruh lingkungan keluarga, kesiapan belajar, dan disiplin belajar terhadap motivasi belajar siswa kelas XI IPS mata pelajaran ekonomi di MA. NU Raudlatul Muallimin Wedung secara simultan maupun parsial. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI IPS di MA. NU Raudlatul Muallimin Wedung yang berjumlah 76 siswa. Semua siswa sejumlah 76 dijadikan sampel dalam penelitian ini. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara observasi, kuisioner, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif persentase, analisis regresi ganda. Hasil dari analisis regresi ganda, analisis uji asumsi klasik, dan analisis uji hipotesis. Hasil dari analisis regresi ganda penelitian ini yaitu Y = 5.555 + 0.229X1 + 0.265X2 + 0.761X3. Ada pengaruh secara simultan sebesar 67,0%, sedangkan pengaruh secara parsial untuk lingkungan  keluarga sebesar 6,708%, kesiapan belajar sebesar 8,41%, da disiplin belajar sebesar 44,756%.The purpose of this research was to know is there any influenced of family environment, readiness to learn, and disciplinery learning of the students' learning motivation in class XI IPS for the subject economic in MA. NU Raudlatul Muallimin Wedung simultaneously or partially. The population in this research were students of class XI IPS in MA. NU Raudlatul Muallimin Wedung totaling 76 students. All 76 students is used to be sample in this research. The data was collected using observation, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used descriptive analysis of the percentage, multiple regression analysis, analysis of classical assumption and hypothesis testing analysis. The results of multiple regression analysis of this research was Y = 5.555 + 0.229X1 + 0.265X2 + 0.761X3. There is a simultaneous influence as much as 67.0%, whereas partially the influence of family environment as much as 6.708%, readiness to learn 8.41%, and the disciplinery of learning 44.756%.
PENGARUH KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK GURU, KOMPETENSI PROFESIONAL GURU, DAN LINGKUNGAN BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI ADMINISTRASI PERKANTORAN SMK WIJAYAKUSUMA JATILAWANG Kusumawardani, Dewi Arnita; Rustiana, Ade
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh kompetensi pedagogik guru, kompetensi profesional guru dan lingkungan belajar siswa terhadap motivasi belajar siswa kelas XI Administrasi Perkantoran SMK Wijayakusuma Jatilawang baik secara simultan maupun parsial. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah berjumlah 95 siswa. Semua siswa sejumlah 95 dijadikan sampel dalam penelitian ini. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif persentase, asumsi klasik, regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa analisis regresi berganda diperoleh persamaan: Y = 1.776 + 0.190  + 0,221 + 0,353 . Berdasarkan output SPSS pengaruh X1 terhadap Y sebesar 0,190 dengan nilai hubungan parsial sebesar 8,4% pada taraf signifikansi 0,005, sedangkan X2 terhadap Y sebesar 0,221 dengan nilai hubungan parsial sebesar 7,6% pada taraf signifikansi 0,007 dan X3 terhadap Y sebesar 0,353 dengan nilai hubungan parsial sebesar 8,8% pada taraf signifikansi 0,004. The purpose of this research is to find out whether there is an influence of the teacher pedagogic competence, teacher professional competence, environment student towards students motivation either simultaneously or partially. The population in this research are 95 students of XI Office Administration Vocational Wijayakusuma Jatilawang. All 95 students is used to be sample in this research. The data collecting method is questionnaire and documentation. The analysis data technique are descriptive, the classical assumption, multiple regression. The results showed that multiple regression analysis obtained by the equation: Y = 1,776 + 0.190X_1 + 0,221X_2 + 0,353X_3. Based on SPSS output X1 effect on Y of 0.190 with a partial correlation value of 8.4% at a significance level of 0.005, while X2 on Y at 0.221 with a partial correlation value of 7.6% at a significance level of 0.007 and 0.353 for the X3 to Y with values partial correlation of 8.8% at a significance level of 0.004.
PENGARUH SUMBER BELAJAR, CARA BELAJAR DAN DISIPLIN TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI SISWA KELAS XI IPS SMA NEGERI 2 KOTA PEKALONGAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Nugroho, Wicaksono Adi; Nurkhin, Ahmadu
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada pengaruh secara bersama-sama  antara sumber belajar, cara belajar dan disiplin terhadap prestasi belajar mata pelajaran ekonomi, pengaruh sumber belajar terhadap prestasi belajar mata pelajaran ekonomi, pengaruh cara belajar terhadap prestasi belajar mata pelajaran ekonomi, dan pengaruh disiplin terhadap prestasi belajar mata pelajaran ekonomi siswa kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri 2 Kota Pekalongan tahun pelajaran 2013/2014. Populasi berjumlah 118 siswa kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri 2 tahun pelajaran 2013/2014. Sedangkan sampel berjumlah 92 siswa. Metode pengumpulan data yaitu angket atau kuesioner dan dokumentasi. Metode analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif persentase dan analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada pengaruh secara bersama-sama antara sumber belajar, cara belajar dan disiplin terhadap prestasi belajar mata pelajaran ekonomi sebesar 61,4%. Sumber belajar berpengaruh terhadap prestasi belajar mata pelajaran ekonomi sebesar 5,95%. Cara belajar berpengaruh terhadap prestasi belajar mata pelajaran ekonomi sebesar 13,76%. Disiplin berpengaruh terhadap prestasi belajar mata pelajaran ekonomi sebesar 16,16%. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is influence jointly between learning resources, learning style and discipline toward learning achievement in economic, the influence of learning resources toward learning achievement in economic, the influence of learning style toward learning achievement in economic and the influence of discipline toward learning achievement in economic subject students in class XI IPS SMA State 2 Pekalongan City Academic Year 2013/2014. Population takes 118 students class XI IPS SMA State 2 year 2013/2014. Meanwhile, sample takes 92 stuents. Methods of data collection are questionnaires and documentation. Methods of data analysis using descriptive percentages and analysis multiple linear regression. The results showed that there is an influence jointly between learning resources, learning style and discipline toward learning achievement in economic by 61,4%. Learning resources affect toward learning achievement in economic by 5,95%. Learning style affect toward learning achievement in economic by 13,76%. Discipline affect toward learning achievement in economic by 16,16%.
PENINGKATAN PARTISIPASI DAN KETERAMPILAN SISWA MELALUI MODEL THINK PAIR SHARE PADA KOMPETENSI DASAR MEMBUKUKAN MUTASI DAN SELISIH DANA KAS KECIL DI SMK BHAKTI PERSADA KENDAL In Ma, Wahibah Lana; Muwartiningsih, Muwartiningsih; Suryani, Nanik
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI Administrasi Perkantoran SMK Bhakti Persada Kendal. Rancangan penelitian ini merupakan penelitian tindakan kelas dengan tiga siklus, dimana setiap siklus meliputi perencanaan, pelaksanaan, pengamatan, dan refleksi. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode tes, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Metode analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis deskriptif..Hasil penelitian pada siklus I menunjukkan partisipasi siswa sebesar 65,50% dalam kategori cukup partisipatif, keterampilan siswa sebesar 68,38% dalam kategori cukup terampil, ketuntasan klasikal 65,50% dengan rata-rata hasil belajar 73,25. Untuk hasil penelitian siklus II menunjukkan partisipasi siswa sebesar 69% , keterampilan  siswa sebesar 73,30%, ketuntasan klasikal 61,29%, menunjukkan rata-rata hasil belajar siswa sebesar 79,96. Untuk hasil penelitian siklus III menunjukkan partisipasi siswa sebesar 82,87%, keterampilan siswa sebesar 82,01%, ketuntasan klasikal 77,41% dengan rata-rata hasil belajar siswa sebesar 79,48. The subjects were students of class XI Administrative SMK Bhakti Persada Kendal. The design of this study is a class action with three cycles, where each cycle includes planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. Data collection methods used in this research is the method of testing, observation, and documentation. Data collection methods used in this research is the method of testing, observation, and documentation. Methods of data analysis in this research using descriptive analysis. The results of the study in the first cycle shows student participation of 65.50 % in the category of participatory enough, the skills students 68,38% in the category of skilled enoug, classical completeness 65.50% with an average of 73.25 learning outcomes. For the second cycle study results showed a 69% student participation, student skills at 73.30, 61.29% classical completeness, showed an average of 79.96 students' learning outcomes. For the results of the third cycle studies show student participation by 82.87%, 82.01% of the students skills, classical completeness 77.41% with an average of 79.48 students' learning outcomes.
PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN ANALISIS MASALAH EKONOMI DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (STUDI PADA SISWA KELAS X IIS 3 SMA 1 BAE KUDUS TAHUN AJARAN 2014/2015) Handayani, Kurnia Norma; Hadi, Syamsu
Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal
Publisher : Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah karena kurangnya kemampuan analisis masalah ekonomi sehingga menyebabkan kurangnya pemahaman siswa akan materi dan berpengaruh terhadap hasil belajar siswa kurang optimal, selain itu karena metode pembelajaran yang digunakan tidak tepat yaitu menggunakan ceramah tanpa variasi sedangkan karakter materinya adalah teoritis dan membutuhkan analisis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan analisis masalah ekonomi dengan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dan mengetahui penerapan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan analisis masalah ekonomi. Subyek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X IIS 3 SMA 1 Bae Kudus. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian tindakan kelas yang dilakukan dalam 2 siklus. Hasil penelitian ini diperoleh data kemampuan analisis siswa siklus I nilai rata-rata 73,94 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 52,94%, pada siklus II nilai rata-rata meningkat menjadi 82,29 dengan ketuntasan klasikal sebesar 82,35%, aktivitas siswa pada pembelajaran siklus I cukup dan pada siklus II meningkat menjadi sangat baik. The background of this research is the lack of knowledge in economic problems so students learning outcomes less optimal, moreover because the learning method that is used is not appropriate to use the oral speech without variation while the character is doctrinaire and needing analysis. This research aims to know improving the analysis ability on the subject economic problems with problem based learning model and how the use problem based learning can improving the analysis ability on the subject economic problems. The subject of this research is the class X IIS 3 SMA 1 Bae Kudus. This study is an action research conducted in two cycles. The research finding showed that analysis ability in learning cycle I average grade is 73,94 with percentage of classical completeness is 52,94%, in cycle II average grade increase to 82,29 with percentage of classical completeness is 82,35%, activity of the teacher in learning cycle I is good, in learning cycle II increase to very good, activity of the students in learning cycle I is enough, in learning cycle II increase to very good.

Page 1 of 6 | Total Record : 54

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 3 (2023): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 12 No 1 (2023): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Economic Education Analysis Journal [Special Issue] Vol 11 No 3 (2022): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 11 No 1 (2022): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 10 No 3 (2021): Economics Education Analysis Journal Vol 10 No 3 (2021): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 10 No 2 (2021): Economics Education Analysis Journal Vol 10 No 2 (2021): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 10 No 1 (2021): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 10 No 1 (2021): Economics Education Analysis Journal Vol 9 No 3 (2020): Economics Education Analysis Journal Vol 9 No 3 (2020): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2020): Economics Education Analysis Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2020): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 9 No 1 (2020): Economics Education Analysis Journal Vol 9 No 1 (2020): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 8 No 3 (2019): Economics Education Analysis Journal Vol 8 No 3 (2019): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 8 No 2 (2019): Economics Education Analysis Journal Vol 8 No 2 (2019): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 8 No 1 (2019): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 3 (2018): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 2 (2018): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 7 No 1 (2018): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 3 (2017): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2017): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2017): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 3 (2016): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 2 (2016): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2016): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 3 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2015): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 3 No 3 (2014): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2014): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 2 No 3 (2013): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2013): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2013): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2012): Economic Education Analysis Journal Vol 1 No 1 (2012): Economic Education Analysis Journal More Issue