Yudi Permana
Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ESG Integration in Sharia Investment: A Maqāṣid Al-Sharī'ah Perspective on Sharia Mutual Fund Portfolios in Indonesia Sholikul Hadi; Ade Sofyan Mulazid; Yudi Permana; Abdul Hakim; Dewi Kurniasari; Meirani Rahayu Rukmanda; Rio Kartika Supriyatna
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 13, No 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v13i1.8995

Abstract

: Despite the rapid growth of sustainable finance, the Islamic jurisprudential status of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) integration in Sharia-compliant mutual funds remains unresolved. Existing scholarship treats ESG–Sharia compatibility as a matter of thematic alignment rather than legal obligation, leaving fund managers and regulators without a normative framework grounded in Islamic legal reasoning. This study addresses that gap by determining the ḥukm taklīfī governing ESG integration in Indonesian Sharia mutual funds. A mixed-methods design is embedded within an uṣūl al-fiqh analytical framework. Quantitatively, Pearson correlation and simple linear regression are applied to ten Sharia mutual funds listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (2019–2024); qualitatively, in-depth interviews with fund managers, Sharia supervisory board members, and capital market regulators are supplemented by a questionnaire administered to 210 retail investors. Empirical findings serve as the maṇāṭ (operative cause) for a three-stage istinbāṭ sequence: taḥqīq al-maṇāṭ, takyīf al-waqāʾīʿ, and takhrīj al-ḥukm. ESG-integrated Sharia funds generate superior risk-adjusted performance (annualised returns of 8.5–9.7%, Sharpe ratios > 1.10) relative to non-ESG Sharia funds (7.0–7.5%; Sharpe ratio ≈ 0.90), confirming ESG integration as consistent with ḥifẓ al-māl. Subjecting these findings to maqāṣid al-sharīʿah analysis — incorporating Ibn ʿĀshūrʿs articulation of ḥifẓ al-bīʿah alongside the maxims lā ḍarar wa lā ḍirār and darʼ al-mafāsid muqaddam ʿalā jalb al-maṣāliḥ — the study derives a graduated ruling: ESG integration is mandūb as a baseline and attains wājib kifāʼī where conventional Sharia screening demonstrably fails to prevent verifiable environmental or social darar. The governance pillar is already operationally embedded within existing Sharia oversight structures; social screening remains partial and requires extension from exclusionary toward positive maqāṣid-oriented assessment; and environmental integration generates a collective institutional obligation to develop the requisite data infrastructure. The study makes an original contribution to Islamic investment jurisprudence (fiqh al-istithmār) as the first to apply a complete uṣūl al-fiqh derivation to ESG integration in Sharia mutual funds, advancing a juristic proposal for a national Sharia-ESG fatwa framework to be coordinated by DSN-MUI and OJK.
The Role of the Constitutional Court in Addressing Centralization Allegations: A Syariah Economic Perspective on Baznas' Contribution to Indonesia's Unified Economic System Yudi Permana; Ade Sofyan Mulazid; Athia Nur Kamilah; Yoghi Citra Pratama; Muhammad Iman Kurniawan; Miftah Hur Rahman Zh; Supriyono Supriyono
Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Vol 4, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Keluarga Guru Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46843/jpm.v4i4.639

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the Constitutional Court's role in institutionalizing a centralized governance model for the National Board of Zakat (BAZNAS) and its systemic implications for Indonesia's economic framework from a Shariah economics perspective. By synthesizing extant literature, it elucidates the legal, operational, and philosophical dynamics underpinning BAZNAS’s evolving mandate. Conducted as a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) in accordance with the PRISMA protocol, systematic searches across Scopus and the Watase Uake System identified 95 articles for in-depth thematic analysis. The findings reveal that the centralization of BAZNAS, legitimized by the Constitutional Court’s ruling, establishes a fundamental tension between national administrative efficiency and local philanthropic autonomy. The analysis confirms BAZNAS’s strategic role not only in zakat distribution but also in advancing national objectives of sustainable development and financial inclusion. However, significant governance challenges, particularly regarding transparency and accountability, persistently surface. The research makes a threefold contribution: First, it identifies a critical methodological gap, demonstrating that dominant quantitative approaches have insufficiently captured the qualitative and contextual dynamics behind operational shortcomings. Second, it surfaces underexplored thematic frontiers, notably those of digitalization, technological integration, and BAZNAS’s potential role in global challenges such as climate change. Third, it proposes a structured agenda for future inquiry and practice. The conclusions emphasize the necessity for methodological diversification, comparative international analysis, and deeper investigation into the distributive impacts of centralization and the transformative potential of technology. Practical implications focus on strengthening governance through mechanisms such as blockchain, fostering inter-institutional collaboration, and advocating for more integrative zakat-sector policies. Future research should prioritize rigorous qualitative studies, comparative models, and examinations of BAZNAS’s role in emerging areas such as green finance and the digitalization of Islamic social finance.