Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSTISI Jurnal Marital: Kajian Hukum Keluarga Islam
Anatolijs Krivins
Daugavpils University
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Concealment of Marital Intentions and Defective Consent in Lavender Marriage: An Analysis of Indonesian Islamic Marriage Law Wiwin Wiwin; Herman B; Phireri Phireri; Sunardi Purwanda; Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril; Anatolijs Krivins
Jurnal Marital: Kajian Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): MARITAL: Kajian Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : IAIN Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/marital_hki.v4i2.16939

Abstract

Fenomena lavender marriage sebagai bentuk perkawinan yang dilangsungkan untuk menyamarkan orientasi seksual menimbulkan problematika hukum dalam sistem hukum perkawinan Indonesia. Permasalahan utama dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana posisi lavender marriage dalam perspektif UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam, serta apa akibat hukum yang ditimbulkannya terhadap keabsahan dan keberlangsungan perkawinan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesesuaian praktik lavender marriage dengan tujuan substantif perkawinan serta mengkaji implikasi hukumnya dalam kerangka hukum positif Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan analitis. Bahan hukum yang digunakan meliputi bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan bahan hukum sekunder berupa literatur ilmiah, yang dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa lavender marriage tidak dikenal secara eksplisit dalam hukum perkawinan Indonesia, namun secara substantif bertentangan dengan esensi perkawinan sebagai ikatan lahir batin, prinsip mitsaqan ghalidzan, serta asas kejujuran dan itikad baik. Praktik ini juga berpotensi mendegradasi pemenuhan hak dan kewajiban suami istri, khususnya dalam aspek hak batin, serta menghambat tercapainya tujuan pembentukan keluarga yang bahagia dan kekal. Secara hukum, lavender marriage dapat menjadi dasar pembatalan perkawinan karena adanya penipuan atau salah sangka, serta dapat pula menjadi alasan perceraian akibat disharmoni yang tidak dapat dipulihkan.
Reorienting Medical Dispute Resolution: MDP, ADR, and Litigation Muhammad Darwis; Anatolijs Kriviņš; Abbas Ibrahim Al-Maliki
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 3 (2026): JUSTISI Inpress
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i3.5579

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the structure of the medical dispute resolution mechanism as stipulated in Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health and to examine its implications for the legal protection of patients, medical personnel, health workers, and health care facilities. The methods used in this study include a normative legal approach, incorporating both a statutory and conceptual framework, through a systematic review of Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, Ministry of Health Regulation No. 3 of 2025, Ministry of Health Regulation No. 4 of 2025, Constitutional Court Decision No. 156/PUU-XXII/2024, and relevant scientific literature. The novelty of this research lies in the formulation of the Multi-Layer Medical Dispute Resolution Model, which integrates the identification of medical incidents, complaints and clarifications, disciplinary enforcement by the Professional Disciplinary Council, alternative dispute resolution, and the potential for administrative, civil, and criminal liability into a single normative framework. The results of the research indicate that prioritizing out-of-court dispute resolution mechanisms forms a multi-layered model oriented toward dialogue, professional evaluation, and redress; however, its effectiveness is largely determined by the clarity of procedures, the capacity of dispute resolution institutions, and the guarantee of balanced access for the parties so that legal protection and access to justice are realized proportionally. The conclusion emphasizes that the normative design of the Health Law has the potential to strengthen legal protection in the field of medical disputes, provided it is accompanied by the strengthening of subsidiary regulations, institutional frameworks, and implementation practices that ensure non-litigation mechanisms truly serve as corrective and restorative measures, rather than mere procedural formalities that hinder the fulfillment of the parties’ legal rights.
Co-Authors Abbas Ibrahim Al-Maliki Herman B Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril Muhammad Darwis Phireri Phireri Sunardi Purwanda Wiwin Wiwin