Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah Mimbar Yustitia : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Jurnal Bakti Humaniora
Tusi Wirahayu Pertiwi
Universitas Ngudi Waluyo
Religion Humanities Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Professionalism Apparatus Law Enforcement as a Factor Determinant of Legal Legitimacy in Society Tusi Wirahayu Pertiwi; Muhamad Latif; Rudy Indrawan
MIMBAR YUSTITIA : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v9i2.11373

Abstract

The professionalism of law enforcement officers is a crucial factor in achieving just, effective, and legitimate law enforcement in society. In practice, however, law enforcement often reveals a gap between legal norms and social reality, frequently caused by low levels of professionalism among officers. This condition shows that the effectiveness of law enforcement depends not only on the clarity of legal norms but also on the quality of those who implement them. This study aims to analyze the professionalism of law enforcement from a socio-legal perspective and examine its implications for the legitimacy of law enforcement institutions. The research employs a socio-legal method that integrates normative legal analysis with an examination of the social dimensions of law enforcement practices. The findings indicate that professionalism extends beyond technical competence and procedural compliance, encompassing integrity, ethical conduct, independence, and sensitivity to social contexts. Weak professionalism contributes to selective law enforcement, discriminatory practices, and declining public trust in legal institutions. From a socio legal perspective, legal legitimacy is not solely derived from formal authority but is also constructed through public acceptance of how the law is applied. Law enforcement perceived as unfair, inconsistent, or lacking transparency undermines institutional credibility and weakens legal compliance. Therefore, strengthening the professionalism of law enforcement officers is essential not only to improve the quality of law enforcement but also to bridge the gap between law in the books and law in action, ensuring the sustainability of institutional legitimacy.
Reformasi Hukum Jabatan Menteri Sebagai Instrumen Revitalisasi Kabinet Profesional Muhamad Latif; Tusi Wirahayu Pertiwi; Dwi Wisnu Kurniawan
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 19 No 02 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 19 No 02 Tahun 2026 (Februari-Juli)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v19i02.1583

Abstract

Abstract The modern era demands adaptive and professional governance in order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 16, and to align with the Asta Cita vision and the National Research Master Plan (RIRN). However, as a background to the issue, the current situation indicates that executive governance still faces accountability challenges, as evidenced by the KPK’s 2023 data on ministerial corruption, the low Government Effectiveness Index (WGI) in 2022 at minus 0.09, and the low perception of cabinet professionalism according to the 2022 National Administrative Agency survey. Building on these issues, this study aims to analyse the urgency of legal reform regarding ministerial positions as a strategic instrument to revitalise a professional cabinet, focusing on legality, competence, and independence from conflicts of interest. The research method employed is descriptive-analytical qualitative research through literature review and document analysis sourced from legislation, scientific publications, and official government reports. The research findings indicate that the existing legal framework still contains regulatory loopholes in the selection and oversight systems, making it vulnerable to triggering maladministration and detrimental political intervention. Therefore, a conceptual model for legal reform is required that establishes the appointment of ministers based on standardised and accountable competency criteria. In conclusion, legal reform regarding ministerial appointments is a crucial instrument in revitalising a professional cabinet, as strengthening the regulations governing the appointment and dismissal of ministers will result in a competent and clean executive branch capable of strengthening state institutions that are oriented towards the public interest.
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF NON-PUNITIVE DALAM MENANGANI AKSI KREAK DI KOMUNITAS SEKOLAH Muhamad Latif; Dwi Wisnu Kurniawan; Tusi Wirahayu Pertiwi; Endang Kusuma Astuti
Jurnal Bakti Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): JUNI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Ngudi Waluyo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35473/jbh.v6i1.5293

Abstract

Menelaah latar belakang masalah yang ada, dinamika konflik di lingkungan sekolah berupa kenakalan remaja atau aksi kreak selama ini didominasi oleh pendekatan hukuman yang kaku, seperti skorsing dan pengembalian siswa kepada orang tua. Pendekatan ini gagal menyelesaikan akar masalah di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Pancasila Salatiga, yang mencatat tiga belas kasus kenakalan dalam setahun terakhir akibat keterbatasan metode intervensi guru bimbingan konseling. Berkaca pada kondisi tersebut, tujuan pengabdian masyarakat ini adalah untuk memperkenalkan dan mengimplementasikan keadilan restoratif sebagai alternatif nonpenghukuman yang humanis, dialogis, dan edukatif. Sementara itu, metode pelaksanaan program non-ekonomi produktif ini dirancang sistematis selama lima bulan melalui tahapan analisis kebutuhan, penyusunan modul, lokakarya filosofi, pelatihan mediasi bagi guru, sosialisasi siswa, serta uji coba prosedur formal bersama mahasiswa Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka. Melalui komitmen kerja sama yang kuat, hasil pengabdian ini sukses mewujudkan luaran utama berupa artikel publikasi ilmiah pada jurnal nasional terakreditasi serta perolehan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual berupa Hak Cipta atas video edukatif penanganan konflik berbasis keadilan restoratif, di samping draf dokumen prosedur penanganan yang disahkan sekolah. Sebagai simpulan akhir dari program ini, penerapan keadilan restoratif terbukti berjalan efektif dan mampu menggeser kultur hukuman menjadi pembinaan yang merangkul, sekaligus menyediakan instrumen edukasi yang legal serta siap ditiru oleh institusi pendidikan lainnya.
The Divergence of Regulatory Logic in Field Practices of Land Boundary Return Policy Implementation Tusi Wirahayu Pertiwi; Muhamad Latif
Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah Vol 21, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : UNISSULA Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jhku.v21i3.53958

Abstract

The land boundary reconciliation policy was originally designed to guarantee legal certainty over land rights, but divergences between regulatory texts and the reality of field practices continue to occur. This study aims to identify the determinants and dissect the root causes of these divergences through a sequential explanatory mixed methods approach. Quantitative analysis involved 100 respondents from Land Offices in Java, Kalimantan, and Sumatra, tested using multiple linear regression based on the theory of George C. Edward III. Meanwhile, qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews in Sleman Regency and Yogyakarta City to explore two contrasting field practices. The results of the quantitative analysis demonstrate that Communication, Resources, and Bureaucratic Structure have a significant influence on policy implementation, with the availability of Measurement Drawings (Resource Sector) being the most dominant factor. Interestingly, Bureaucratic Structure shows a negative influence; clarity of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) is often used as a legitimizing instrument in the field to divert services as a form of policy drift. This quantitative model explains 20% of the variation in implementation, indicating the significant role of pragmatic field factors such as legal risk, physical land dynamics, and low public awareness. This study concludes that the root of the divergence is not due to unclear regulations, but rather to a failure to reconcile the "logic of implementation," representing formal regulatory directives, and the "logic of discovery," born of technical experience in the field. The dominance of the logic of discovery in Sleman resulted in a complete shift to boundary delimitation services, while the balance of the two logics in Yogyakarta allowed for the maintenance of boundary reestablishment practices in the field.
Co-Authors Dwi Wisnu Kurniawan Endang Kusuma Astuti Latif, Muhamad Muhamad Latif Rudy Indrawan