Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam As-Sakinah : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam MASADIR: Jurnal Hukum Islam
Firdaus
Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Lafaz Haqiqah dan Majaz dalam Penetapan Hukum Keluarga Kontemporer Yulizain Putra; Muchlis Bahar; Firdaus
As-Sakinah : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 4 No 1 (2026): As-Sakinah : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : STAI Pelabuhan Ratu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the linguistic hierarchy scheme, Haqiqah occupies a superior position compared to Majaz, because Haqiqah is the main core while Majaz is only a derivative. Consequently, Majaz should not be used as the foundation for establishing Islamic law unless Haqiqah is difficult to implement, and at that time a supporting indicator (qarinah) is needed to clearly guide it. In Arabic linguistics, the term "an-nikâh" encompasses both the essential and the figurative meanings. Imam Nawawi explained that linguistically, "nikâh" means union. Sometimes, this term refers to the "marriage contract," and other times to the "husband-wife relationship." This research is qualitative through a literature study approach, relying on secondary data from relevant OJS-based books and scientific journals. From an in-depth analysis, the author concludes that the understanding of the concept of marriage in Islam—specifically the term "nikah"—can be explained through the lens of Haqiqah and Majaz. Experts in ushul fiqh and Arabic linguists state that the essence of "nikah" is "watha" (intimate relations). However, the fuqaha from the four schools of thought agree that the true essence is "agreement", while the majaz refers to "watha".
: Pandangan Muhammadiyah Dan Hukum Positif Indonesia Yulizain Putra; Firdaus; Rahmat Hidayat
MASADIR: Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol. 5 No. 01 (2025): April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Kiai Abdullah Faqih (UNKAFA) Gresik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33754/masadir.v5i01.1759

Abstract

This study examines the family resilience challenges posed by repeated informal marriages (nikah siri) using the case of Vicky Prasetyo as a focal example. The research aims to explore the perspectives of Muhammadiyah and Indonesian positive law regarding these challenges. The method employed is a qualitative content analysis of normative texts to identify the main challenges and responses related to family sustainability within the context of repeated nikah siri. The results reveal significant legal, social, and religious tensions that complicate the protection and welfare of families involved. Muhammadiyah emphasizes the importance of lawful marriage procedures to safeguard family stability, while Indonesian positive law categorically regulates marriage legality but faces enforcement limitations especially in informal marriage cases. The discussion highlights the gap between religious-social norms and statutory law, urging integrated efforts to address family vulnerabilities due to repeated nikah siri. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of legal-religious dynamics influencing family resilience in Indonesia.
Aborsi: Analisis Metode Ijtihad Fatwa MUI sebagai Respons atas Isu Kontemporer Siti Aisyah; Firdaus; Zainal Azwar
Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Education and Islamic Studies
Publisher : STAI DDI Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55623/au.v7i1.533

Abstract

Aborsi merupakan isu kontemporer yang kompleks dan melibatkan dimensi hukum, agama, etika, sosial, serta kesehatan. Dalam konteks keislaman, aborsi menjadi masalah ijtihadiyah yang memunculkan perbedaan pendapat para ulama, terutama terkait batas usia kehamilan dan kondisi yang membolehkan pengguguran janin. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis metode ijtihad Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) dalam penetapan fatwa tentang aborsi, khususnya Fatwa MUI No. 1 Tahun 2000 dan Fatwa MUI No. 4 Tahun 2005. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif-analitis berbasis studi kepustakaan, penelitian ini menelaah bagaimana MUI mengintegrasikan Al-Qur’an, hadis, dan kaidah-kaidah fiqhiyyah dalam proses penetapan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Fatwa MUI No. 1 Tahun 2000 bersifat normatif dan konservatif, dengan menekankan keharaman aborsi kecuali dalam kondisi darurat yang mengancam nyawa ibu. Sebaliknya, Fatwa MUI No. 4 Tahun 2005 lebih komprehensif dan kontekstual karena mempertimbangkan aspek medis, psikologis, serta sosial, khususnya dalam kasus pemerkosaan. Fatwa ini memanfaatkan kaidah fikih seperti al-dharūrāt tubīḥ al-maḥẓūrāt, al-ḥājah tanzil manzilat al-dharūrah, dar’ al-mafāsid, dan akhaff al-ḍararayn sehingga menghasilkan ketentuan hukum yang lebih aplikatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa ijtihad MUI bersifat dinamis dan adaptif terhadap perubahan zaman, dengan tetap berlandaskan prinsip maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, terutama perlindungan jiwa, martabat, dan kemaslahatan masyarakat.
Co-Authors Muchlis Bahar Rahmat Hidayat Siti Aisyah Yulizain Putra Yulizain Putra Zainal Azwar