Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Iqtishoduna: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam Jurnal Al-Hakim : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi
Itang
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
State Intervention in Islamic Family Law: A Comparative Analysis of Pakistan and Indonesia within the Framework of Maqāṣid al-Sharīah Resti Septiani; oom Mukarromah; Nuruf Ma'rifah; Itang; Buang Yusuf
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 8 No. 1 May 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v8i1.14786

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the forms and models of state intervention in Islamic family law in Pakistan and Indonesia and their relevance within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharīah and the relationship between fiqh and state law. Previous studies have examined Islamic family law reform in Muslim-majority countries; however, limited attention has been given to comparative analysis between Pakistan and Indonesia from the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharīah and the interaction between religious jurisprudence and state legal systems. This research employs a normative juridical method with comparative and conceptual approaches by examining legal regulations and relevant literature. The findings show that Pakistan adopts a more restrictive and administrative model with strong state control, while Indonesia applies a more moderate judicial approach that allows greater interpretative flexibility. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharīah, regulations concerning polygamy, divorce, and marriage registration are oriented toward the protection of life, lineage, and property. This study also finds that the Indonesian model is more representative in its implementation of maqāṣid al-sharīah comprehensively, as it balances legal certainty, fiqh flexibility, and substantive justice through a contextual judicial mechanism. Nevertheless, the Pakistani model demonstrates stronger preventive protection through stricter administrative supervision. Therefore, this study recommends the development of an Islamic family law system that integrates Indonesia’s judicial flexibility with stronger administrative supervision as implemented in Pakistan in order to achieve more comprehensive legal protection and social welfare (maslahah).
The Potential of Waqf and Zakat–Infaq–Sadaqah (ZIS) in Promoting Sustainable Economic Growth Across Indonesian Provinces (2021–2023) Raden Ajeng Entaresmen; Nuraini Chaniago; Windhy Puspitasari; Risa Nurmala Dewi; Azizah Amelia Eka Susanti; Suryani; Itang
IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): April (on progress)
Publisher : Department of Sharia Economics Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, Universitas Islam Syarifuddin Lumajang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54471/iqtishoduna.v15i1.3516

Abstract

This study examines whether Waqf, Zakat and Infaq/Sadaqah actually promote sustainable economic growth in Indonesia, or whether this is merely an assumption. The 2021–2023 period was not chosen at random: this is the post-pandemic recovery period when inter-provincial disparities in the collection and distribution of Islamic social funds are most evident, and simultaneously the implementation period of the 2020–2024 National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN), which provides verifiable SDG benchmarks. Secondary data from 35 provinces were analysed using panel regression. The results were mixed. Zakat and Infaq/Sedekah were found to have a positive and significant impact on social welfare and poverty alleviation. Wakaf, however, showed the opposite trend — a negative relationship with development indicators — which points more to governance issues than to weaknesses in the instrument itself. The direct implication is that the management of Wakaf needs to be institutionally reformed, rather than merely expanded. Meanwhile, the existing distribution mechanisms for Zakat and Infaq/Sedekah need to be maintained and strengthened. This study fills an empirical gap that has been largely overlooked in the literature on Islamic social finance, namely the differences in impact across provinces at the regional level.
Co-Authors Azizah Amelia Eka Susanti Buang Yusuf Nuraini Chaniago Nuruf Ma'rifah Oom Mukarromah Raden Ajeng Entaresmen Resti Septiani Risa Nurmala Dewi Suryani Windhy Puspitasari