Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro YARSI Medical Journal
Damma Purnawati, Ratna
Departement Of Microbiology, Faculty Of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
Medicine & Pharmacology

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pola kuman pada penderita Infeksi Saluran Kemihdi RSUP Dr Kariadi Semarang Joni Karjono, Bambang; Susilaningsih, Neni; Damma Purnawati, Ratna
Jurnal Kedokteran YARSI Vol 17, No 2 (2009): MEI - AGUSTUS 2009
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas YARSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (287.611 KB) | DOI: 10.33476/jky.v17i2.205

Abstract

Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections found in clinical practice. The incidence of UTI increases with age. Despite various causes, the main causal agent is Escherichia coli.The aim of this study is to observe the pattern of bacteria underlying UTI in Dr. Kariadi Teaching Hospital, Semarang. A cross sectional design study was conducted using urine samples collected from 195 patients being diagnosed as UTI. Urine samples were cultured and counted according to microbiology standard method. Data obtained were analyzed employing descriptive approach. The result showed that 79 individuals (40.5%) were suffering from UTI, consisting of 31.6% male and 68.4%women. Most of the UTI patients were due to E. coli (65.8%) followed by E.coli and S. aureus (10.1%), S.Aureus (8.9%), Enterobacter sp. (7.6%), E. coli and Pseudomonassp. (2.5%), Enterobacter sp.E. coli (2.5%), Enterococcus sp. (1.3%) and E.coli, S. aureus and Enterobacter sp. (1.3%). It was concluded that the most common cause of UTI was E. coli and women were more frequently affected than men.
MACROSCOPICS AND MICROSCOPICS FEATURE OF WITAR RATS LIVER AFTER IMMERSION IN GRADUAL CONCENTRATION OF RANDU HONEY Putri Ariani Kusuma; Tuntas Dhanardhono; Saebani Saebani; Ratna Damma Purnawati; Hermawan Istiadi
JURNAL KEDOKTERAN DIPONEGORO (DIPONEGORO MEDICAL JOURNAL) Vol 10, No 4 (2021): JURNAL KEDOKTERAN DIPONEGORO (DIPONEGORO MEDICAL JOURNAL)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dmj.v10i4.30045

Abstract

Background Formaldeyde is main substance used for organ embalming and even for foods preservations. However, long and high exposure of formaldeyhde lead to various organs irritations. Honey is well-known for its natural preservative activity expected to be the soultion for the problem so there is safe alternative for organ preservations.Aim Observation and examintaion the difference of macroscopic and microscopics feature of Wistar rats liver after immersion of formaldehyde and randu honey.Methods Experimental with post-test only control group design using 24 male Wistar rats as sample, randomly divided into 4 groups consist of: Group C (preserved with 10% formaldehyde solutions), P1 (preserved with 10% randu honey solutions), P2 (preserved with 20% randu honey solutions) and P3 (preserved with 30% randu honey solutions). The sampels were preserved for 24 hours then macroscopic (smell,color and size) and microscopic study with Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) stain  using 400x observation performed. Manja Roenigk score were used to accessed the degree of live microsopic damage.Results There are normal cells, mild damage, moderate damage and severe damage respectively in the group C: 36%,47%,17%,0% ; P1: 0%,27%,46%,27% ; P2: 0%,77%,17%,6% ; P3: 47%,33%,17%,3%. Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant results with p=0.000. With Mann-Whitney test, significant results were found between group C with P1 (0.000), C with P2 (0.006), P1 with P2 (0.000), P1 with P3 (0.000) and P2 with P3 (0.003). However, test result were not significant berween group C with P3 (0.684).Conclusions There were differences in macroscopics and microscopic features between Wistar rats liver after immersion in formaldehyde and randu honey. The best features showed in samples preserved in 30% Randu Honey solutions.
THE EFFECT OF 0.12% CHLORHEXIDINE DIGLUCONATE AND 0.1% CHLORINE DIOXIDE ON DISCOLORATION OF NANOFILLED COMPOSITE RESIN Shabika Shabika; Gustantyo Wahyu Wibowo; Ratna Damma Purnawati; Isniya Nosartika
JURNAL KEDOKTERAN DIPONEGORO (DIPONEGORO MEDICAL JOURNAL) Vol 11, No 1 (2022): JURNAL KEDOKTERAN DIPONEGORO (DIPONEGORO MEDICAL JOURNAL)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dmj.v11i1.31322

Abstract

ABSTRAK Background: Composite resins are able to generate the color of dental restorative materials based on the original teeth's color. Nanofilled composite resins have compressive strength, good polishing, and color stability compared to other types of composite resins. Color changes may occur due to intrinsic and extrinsic factor example mouthwash. Mouthwash that is commonly used is chlorhexidine. The use of chlorhexidine mouthwash continuously may stain the composite resins. Mouthwash that has a good anti-plaque other than chlorhexidine is chlorine dioxide which has a clear color and does not cause changes in taste on the tongue.Aim: To determine the effect of 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate mouthwash and 0.1% chlorine dioxide mouthwash to the discoloration of nanofilled composite resins. Methods: This study is an experimental study with a pre-test and post-test control group design. Samples are nanofilledcomposite resins made into discs in total of 27 and divided into three groups with different treatments, soaked with 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate mouthwash, 0.1% chlorine dioxide mouthwash, and sterile distilled water. Each group was soaked for 24 hours and tested for staining using chromameter.Result: ANOVA test showed the significant difference between group, that the greatest color change is the one soaked with 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate mouthwash compared to 0.1% chlorine dioxide mouthwashConclusions:  The use of 0.1% chlorine dioxide mouthwash does not cause discoloration as much as 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate mouthwash.Keywords: Chlorhexidine digluconate, Chlorine dioxide, nanofilled composite resin, discoloration
Co-Authors Gustantyo Wahyu Wibowo Hermawan Istiadi Joni Karjono, Bambang Neni Susilaningsih Nosartika, Isniya Putri Ariani Kusuma Saebani Saebani Shabika Shabika Tuntas Dhanardhono