Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Islamic Science on Definition and Object of Study Firdaus Ardianto; Zulhandra Zulhandra; Muklis M; Saipullah SA; Ahmad Husein
Studi Multidisipliner: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Vol 13, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padngsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/multidisipliner.v13i1.18369

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the concept of philosophy of science and philosophy of Islamic science by focusing on the definition and object of study. This study is motivated by the importance of a philosophical understanding of science, both in the general perspective and in the Islamic scientific tradition, as the basis for the development of integrative and holistic science. The research uses a qualitative approach with the type of library research. Data was obtained from various sources of literature, such as books, scientific journals, articles, and academic documents relevant to the research theme. The data analysis technique is carried out through content analysis to identify, classify, and interpret the main concepts related to the philosophy of science and the philosophy of Islamic science. The results of the study show that philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy that discusses the nature of science, methods of obtaining knowledge, and the validity and purpose of science. Meanwhile, the philosophy of Islamic science not only focuses on rational and empirical aspects, but also places revelation as the main source of knowledge. The object of study of philosophy of science includes ontology, epistemology, and axiology of science, while philosophy of Islamic science expands the study through the integration of spiritual values, ethics, and Islamic principles in the development of science. This research emphasizes that the philosophy of science and the philosophy of Islamic science are closely related in building a comprehensive scientific paradigm oriented towards human benefit.
A SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF MUBHAM AL-DALALAH: ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF RELIGIOUS TEXTS Armalena; Ali Amran; Erman; Firdaus Ardianto; Mukhlis M; Mahyudin Ritonga; Rusydi
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i3.783

Abstract

This research investigates the semantic complexities of Mubham al-Dalalah to determine its influence on the interpretative process of religious scriptures. It aims to explain how textual ambiguity functions within Islamic legal interpretation and contributes to maintaining legal flexibility across different temporal and social contexts. The study employs a qualitative library research methodology grounded in semantic-hermeneutic principles. Classical Usul al-Fiqh literature is integrated with modern linguistic theories, with classical treatises serving as the primary data source for analyzing four levels of semantic ambiguity. The findings classify semantic ambiguity into four categories: Khafi, Mushkil, Mujmal, and Mutashabih, each requiring a distinct level of interpretative rigor. The study demonstrates that semantic analysis transforms ambiguity from a linguistic obstacle into an opportunity for ijtihad, while contextual considerations are essential for selecting appropriate meanings consistent with divine intent and justice. Furthermore, integrating classical Islamic scholarship with contemporary linguistic approaches produces a more comprehensive understanding of religious texts. The study provides a theoretical framework for strengthening contemporary Islamic legal interpretation by combining classical Usul al-Fiqh with modern semantic analysis. It offers guidance for scholars and jurists in addressing contemporary legal and social issues while preserving fidelity to Islamic textual principles, thereby enhancing the relevance of religious interpretation in increasingly pluralistic and globalized societies. The originality of this study lies in its integration of classical Islamic semantic theory (Mubham al-Dalalah) with modern linguistic and hermeneutic approaches. By systematically conceptualizing the four hierarchical levels of semantic ambiguity within a contemporary interpretative framework, the research provides a novel analytical model that bridges traditional Islamic jurisprudence and modern linguistic scholarship.