Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Islamic Studies in the World Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam
Rusydi Rusydi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
Religion Humanities

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Dynamics of Islamic Religious Education Learning for Children with Special Needs at SLB YPPLB Padang City M Faisal; Rusydi Rusydi; Romiyilhas Romiyilhas; Nurul Huda
Islamic Studies in the World Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/isw.v2i2.2277

Abstract

Background. Islamic Religious Education for Children with Special Needs (ABK) plays a crucial role in the formation of inclusive character and spirituality. However, Islamic Religious Education learning for ABK at SLB YPPLB Padang City faces complex challenges, such as the heterogeneity of student needs (mentally retarded, deaf, physically disabled), limitations of conventional methods, and minimal teaching materials and teacher training. Purpose. This study aims to analyze Islamic Religious Education learning strategies, supporting factors, and inhibiting factors at SLB YPPLB. Method. The research used a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through observation, in-depth interviews with Islamic Religious Education teachers, special needs students, and education personnel, as well as documentation studies. Results. The results of the study show that: 1) Learning planning still adopts standard lesson plans with limited modifications, 2) The learning process is dominated by lecture and drill methods which are less effective, 3) Evaluation tends to be conventional and not fully adaptive, and 4) The main inhibiting factors include limited resources, while collaborative assessments and visual media are potential supporters. Conclusion. The study's conclusions confirm the need for the development of flexible lesson plans, inclusive method-based teacher training, and portfolio-based evaluation. These findings contribute to the integration of Islamic education principles (ta'd?b and tarbiyah) with inclusive education theories (differentiated instruction, scaffolding), while strengthening the urgency of systematic policies for holistic Islamic Religious Education learning for children with special needs. Further research recommendations include multi-location studies and the development of special needs assessment instruments.
A SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF MUBHAM AL-DALALAH: ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF RELIGIOUS TEXTS Armalena Armalena; Ali Amran; Erman Erman; Firdaus Ardianto; Mukhlis M; Mahyudin Ritonga; Rusydi Rusydi
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i3.783

Abstract

This research investigates the semantic complexities of Mubham al-Dalalah to determine its influence on the interpretative process of religious scriptures. It aims to explain how textual ambiguity functions within Islamic legal interpretation and contributes to maintaining legal flexibility across different temporal and social contexts. The study employs a qualitative library research methodology grounded in semantic-hermeneutic principles. Classical Usul al-Fiqh literature is integrated with modern linguistic theories, with classical treatises serving as the primary data source for analyzing four levels of semantic ambiguity. The findings classify semantic ambiguity into four categories: Khafi, Mushkil, Mujmal, and Mutashabih, each requiring a distinct level of interpretative rigor. The study demonstrates that semantic analysis transforms ambiguity from a linguistic obstacle into an opportunity for ijtihad, while contextual considerations are essential for selecting appropriate meanings consistent with divine intent and justice. Furthermore, integrating classical Islamic scholarship with contemporary linguistic approaches produces a more comprehensive understanding of religious texts. The study provides a theoretical framework for strengthening contemporary Islamic legal interpretation by combining classical Usul al-Fiqh with modern semantic analysis. It offers guidance for scholars and jurists in addressing contemporary legal and social issues while preserving fidelity to Islamic textual principles, thereby enhancing the relevance of religious interpretation in increasingly pluralistic and globalized societies. The originality of this study lies in its integration of classical Islamic semantic theory (Mubham al-Dalalah) with modern linguistic and hermeneutic approaches. By systematically conceptualizing the four hierarchical levels of semantic ambiguity within a contemporary interpretative framework, the research provides a novel analytical model that bridges traditional Islamic jurisprudence and modern linguistic scholarship.
AN ANALYSIS OF LAFZ AL-AMR WA AL-NAHY FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF LINGUISTICS, QUR’ANIC EXEGESIS, AND USUL AL-FIQH Syahrul Fadli R; Yuliarni Yuliarni; Yuliani Yuliani; Ali Amat; Maigus Maigus; Mardianis Mardianis; Mira Salsabila; Mahyudin Ritonga; Rusydi Rusydi
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): APRIL
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i2.1068

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concepts of amr (command) and nahy (prohibition) by integrating the perspectives of Arabic linguistics, Qur'anic exegesis, and usul fiqh. It explains how linguistic structures, interpretive methods, and legal theories shape the understanding of these normative expressions in Islamic texts. This study employed a qualitative library research approach. Data were collected from the Qur'an, Hadith, classical and contemporary Qur’anic exegesis, Arabic linguistic literature, and usul fiqh references. The data were analyzed using content and conceptual analysis to identify, compare, and synthesize the meanings and legal implications of amr and nahy. The findings reveal that amr and nahy cannot be understood through grammatical analysis alone. Their meanings are constructed through the interaction of semantic, pragmatic, contextual, exegetical, and usul fiqh perspectives, producing a more comprehensive understanding of Islamic normative texts. This study contributes to interdisciplinary Islamic legal studies by providing an integrated analytical framework that connects language, interpretation, and legal reasoning for researchers, educators, and scholars. The originality of this study lies in its integrative conceptual framework, which synthesizes Arabic linguistic theory, Qur'anic interpretation, and usul fiqh methodology into a unified model. Unlike previous studies that examined amr and nahy from a single disciplinary perspective, this research offers a holistic understanding of the dynamic relationship between language, interpretation, and legal formulation in Islamic studies.
Co-Authors Ali Amat Ali Amran Armalena, Armalena Erman Erman Firdaus Ardianto M Faisal Mahyudin Ritonga Maigus Maigus Mardianis Mardianis Mira Salsabila Mukhlis M Nurul Huda Romiyilhas Romiyilhas Syahrul Fadli R Yuliani Yuliani Yuliarni Yuliarni