Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Sujud: Jurnal Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Indonesia Berdampak: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Mutia Nur Fadhilah Ruslan
Universitas Halu Oleo
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Dinasti Politik dan Prinsip Equal Opportunity dalam Jabatan Publik di Indonesia Mutia Nur Fadhilah Ruslan
Sujud: Jurnal Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): JUNI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/a1rgr517

Abstract

Political dynasties have become a persistent phenomenon in Indonesia’s post-reform political system. Previous studies generally focus on their impact on democracy, nepotism, political oligarchy, and abuse of power. However, limited attention has been given to examining political dynasties from the perspective of the principle of equal opportunity in public office, which constitutes an essential element of both the rule of law and constitutional democracy. This study aims to analyze the regulation of political rights and the principle of equal opportunity within Indonesia’s constitutional system, examine the influence of political dynasties on equal access to public office, and formulate a legal framework capable of ensuring equal opportunity without infringing upon citizens’ constitutional right to be elected. The findings indicate that political dynasties are not formally inconsistent with the Constitution or procedural democracy because they emerge through legitimate electoral processes and constitute part of citizens’ constitutional right to run for public office, as guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution and affirmed in Constitutional Court Decision Number 33/PUU-XIII/2015. Nevertheless, from the perspectives of equal opportunity and political equality, political dynasties may create unequal political opportunities through privileged access to political resources, networks of power, political party support, and social and economic capital unavailable to ordinary citizens. Such conditions may reduce the quality of political competition and limit equal access to public office.  
Pengaruh Koalisi Partai Politik Terhadap Fungsi Pengawasan DPR dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia Mutia Nur Fadhilah Ruslan
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI 2026
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/tzd5gz93

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of political party coalitions on the supervisory function of the House of Representatives (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat/DPR) within Indonesia’s presidential system and to examine its implications for the effectiveness of the checks and balances principle. The research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, which are analyzed qualitatively through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation methods. The findings indicate that the formation of political party coalitions is a logical consequence of the combination of a presidential system and a multiparty political system in Indonesia. Political coalitions play an important role in maintaining governmental stability and supporting the effective implementation of public policies. However, the dominance of pro-government coalitions in the DPR has the potential to weaken the parliamentary oversight function due to political loyalty that affects the independence of legislators in exercising their constitutional oversight instruments, including the right of interpellation, the right of inquiry, and the right to express opinions. As a result, the supervisory function is not always carried out critically and objectively, leading to a weakening of the checks and balances mechanism. Furthermore, coalition dominance may reduce the role of parliamentary opposition as a counterbalance to governmental power. Therefore, strengthening the institutional capacity of the DPR, optimizing constitutional oversight mechanisms, and fostering a political culture that recognizes oversight as an independent constitutional responsibility are essential. These efforts are necessary to maintain governmental accountability, balance of power, and the quality of constitutional democracy in Indonesia.
Peningkatan Keterampilan Praktis Hukum Melalui Pelatihan Penyusunan Gugatan Perdata Bagi Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Halu Oleo Satriani Satriani; Pipit Somefotorono Majid; Besse Sari Angraeni; Mutia Nur Fadhilah Ruslan; Andi Khaedhir Kamri; Risman Setiawan
Indonesia Berdampak: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): JULI-DESEMBER
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/72c7hd81

Abstract

The ability to draft civil lawsuits constitutes one of the essential practical competencies that must be possessed by law students, particularly those who are preparing to enter legal professions such as advocates, judges, prosecutors, and legal consultants. However, legal education in higher education institutions is often dominated by theoretical approaches, resulting in limited opportunities for students to develop practical litigation skills, especially in drafting civil procedural documents. This community service activity aimed to improve the practical legal skills of students of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Halu Oleo, through training on the preparation of civil lawsuit documents. The activity was conducted in collaboration with the Moot Court Community of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Halu Oleo, using a participatory and practice-based learning approach. The methods employed included lectures, interactive discussions, case analysis, document review, and simulation exercises involving the preparation of civil lawsuits based on case scenarios designed to encourage legal reasoning and analytical skills. The results of the activity demonstrated a significant improvement in participants' understanding of the formal and substantive requirements of civil lawsuits, the structure and systematic drafting of pleadings, and the relationship between legal facts, legal arguments, and legal remedies sought in court. Participants also showed enhanced abilities in identifying legal issues, determining the appropriate parties and legal grounds for litigation, and preparing coherent and executable claims. Furthermore, the activity contributed to strengthening students' confidence in engaging in legal practice and promoted the development of practice-oriented legal education within the Faculty of Law, Universitas Halu Oleo.
Efektifitas Konstitusional Kebijakan Publik di Indonesia: Tinjauan Normatif atas Legal Gap  dan Akuntabilitas Negara Mutia Nur Fadhilah Ruslan
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/ggxa1z51

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the constitutional effectiveness of public policy in Indonesia through a normative examination of the phenomena of legal gaps and accountability gaps, while proposing a model for strengthening state accountability to ensure the realization of constitutional objectives. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, case, and limited comparative approaches. The legal materials consist of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, relevant legislation, decisions of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, as well as scholarly literature and official reports from state institutions. Data were analyzed using a normative-qualitative approach supported by gap analysis to identify discrepancies between legal norms (das sollen) and policy implementation (das sein). The findings indicate that the effectiveness of public policy cannot be assessed solely based on formal legality but must also consider functionality, accountability, and public participation as key indicators of constitutional effectiveness. The study reveals that legal gaps arise from regulatory disharmony, weak bureaucratic capacity, and institutional fragmentation, while accountability gaps result from fragmented oversight mechanisms that remain predominantly focused on administrative compliance. As its conceptual contribution, this research introduces the paradigm of constitutional effectiveness as a comprehensive framework for evaluating public policy, develops a typology of legal gaps and accountability gaps as analytical instruments, and proposes the concept of constitutional policy review as a post-implementation evaluation mechanism that complements judicial review. This model is expected to strengthen state accountability, enhance the quality of public governance, and ensure that public policies effectively realize constitutional values and the objectives of the state as mandated by the 1945 Constitution.
Co-Authors Andi Khaedhir Kamri Besse Sari Angraeni Pipit Somefotorono Majid Risman Setiawan Satriani Satriani