Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kedudukan Amnesti dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia Dwi Novantoro; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/jq.v4i3.7922

Abstract

Ketentuan amnesti merupakan salah satu dari 4 (empat) bentuk pengampunan yang merupakan hak prerogatif Presiden berdasarkan Pasal 14 UUD NRI 1945. Selain tersurat dalam Pasal 14 ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945 dan Pasal 1 dan Pasal 4 UU Darurat RI Nomor 11 Tahun 1954 tentang Amnesti dan Abolisi, sebagai pembaharuan hukum pidana, amnesti merupakan salah satu aspek yang membuat gugurnya kewenangan penuntutan sebagaimana tersurat dalam Pasal 132 ayat (1) huruf h UU 1/2023 tentang KUHP dan  Pasal 71 ayat (2) huruf h UU 20/2025 tentang KUHAP serta Pasal 132 ayat (1) huruf h UU 1/2026 tentang Penyesuaian Pidana. Amnesti juga merupakan salah satu aspek yang membuat gugurnya kewenangan pelaksanaan pidana sebagaimana tersurat dalam Pasal 140 huruf c UU 1/2023 tentang KUHP. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui kedudukan amnesti dalam sistem peradilan pidana demi terwujudnya supremasi hukum yang berkepastian dan berkeadilan.
Restorative Justice Paradigm as a Complement to Retributive Justice: A Review from the Perspective of Pancasila Philosophy Azaris Pahlemy; Dwi Novantoro; Dominikus Rato; Fendi Setyawan
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study employs a normative juridical approach. Following the enactment of the new Indonesian Criminal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana/KUHP) through Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code and the new Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana/KUHAP) through Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Code of Criminal Procedure, both of which came into effect on 2 January 2026, there has been a paradigm shift in the focus of criminal punishment from a retributive justice approach to restorative justice. This paradigm shift arose because retributive justice has been unable to resolve the root causes of crime, has failed to provide adequate space for victim recovery, and has negatively affected social interactions within society. The restorative justice approach offers the concept that punishment should not merely be oriented toward retaliation, but should also take into account the rights and losses suffered by victims, while simultaneously seeking the restoration of social relations within the community. The paradigm of restorative justice is reflected in the minutes of the first session of the Investigating Committee for Preparatory Work for Indonesian Independence (Badan Penyelidik Usaha-Usaha Persiapan Kemerdekaan/BPUPK) held from 29 May to 1 June 1945, which became the embryo for the birth of Pancasila, stating that: “…so that in this era the State of Indonesia may be established, where people can live safely and prosperously, moving toward the attainment of perfect humanity. Therefore, the foremost legal requirement must be respect for human rights and obligations in the deepest sense.” Law enforcement cannot be separated from respect for humanitarian values, both from the perspective of perpetrators and victims, in order to realize a safe and prosperous society in accordance with the philosophy of Pancasila. Keywords: Law Enforcement, Concept of Justice, Pancasila Philosophy