Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.503
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Masalah-Masalah Hukum Lentera Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Multidiciplinary Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Iso Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Y A Triana Ohoiwutun
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Jember
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

 1   2 
THE URGENCY OF PSYCHIATRIC THERAPY SANCTION IMPOSITION AGAINST PERPETRATORS OF PEDOPHILIA Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 15, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2015.15.3.397

Abstract

The pedophilia crime can be imprisoned under the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Child Protection Act of 2014 (UU Perlindungan Anak Tahun 2014); whereas pedophile can be qualifild as the psychiatric disorder in accordance with ICD, DSM and PPDGJ definition. The imposition of measures psychotherapy is able to be integrated and synergized with the imprisonment penalty based on the concept of criminal individualization and double track system. Therefore the penalties againts pedophiles could be effective and efficient penalties not only the perpetrators but also for the society.Key words: pedophilia, criminal sanctions, psychiatric therapy.
SEL BERFASILITAS ISTIMEWA DITINJAU DARI ASPEK KEBIJAKAN KRIMINAL Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 43, No 4 (2014): Masalah-Masalah Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (371.142 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.43.4.2014.478-486

Abstract

Measures of imprisonment and a criminal sanctions in prison is a form deprivation of freedom. The threat of imprisonment occupies a central position in a criminal stelsel, result in the imposition of sanctions against the imprisonment of criminals, so that cause the advantages capacity of prison to execute the decision of imprisonment. Advantages prison capacity, resulting to limited facilities provided to prisoners. Desire to get certain facilities in cell can be met only to rich people by did the dirty deed. certain special facilities, only the rich can be enjoyed by most person, an inhibitor of the passage of the criminal justice system. To overcome these problems, can be taken through the prevention and control of criminal policy, that is by means of penal and a non-penal. Keywords: Cell, Special, Criminal Policy. Tindakan penahanan dan sanksi pidana penjara merupakan bentuk perampasan kemerdekaan seseorang. Ancaman pidana penjara menempati posisi sentral dalam stelsel pidana, berakibat pada penjatuhan sanksi pidana penjara terhadap pelaku tindak pidana, sehingga terjadi kelebihan kapasitas daya tampung lapas untuk melaksanakan putusan pidana penjara. Kelebihan daya tampung lapas, berakibat keterbatasan fasilitas yang disediakan untuk narapidana. Keinginan mendapatkan fasilitas tertentu hanya dapat dipenuhi oleh orang kaya dengan cara melakukan perbuatan kotor. Fasilitas tertentu yang istimewa di dalam sel, hanya dapat dinikmati sebagian orang kaya, merupakan penghambat berjalannya sistem peradilan pidana. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan tersebut, dapat dilakukan tindakan pencegahan dan penanggulangan melalui kebijakan kriminal, yaitu melalui sarana penal dan non penal. Kata kunci: Sel, Istimewa, Kebijakan Kriminal
MENALAR SEL MEWAH DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun; Samsudi Samsudi
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 46, No 1 (2017): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3323.263 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.46.1.2017.48-54

Abstract

Ancaman pidana penjara menempati posisi sentral dalam stelsel pidana, berakibat pada banyaknya penjatuhan sanksi pidana penjara terhadap pelaku tindak pidana, sehingga terjadi kelebihan kapasitas daya tampung lapas. Kelebihan daya tampung lapas, berakibat keterbatasan fasilitas yang disediakan untuk narapidana, sehingga terjadi permainan kotor atau suap. Fasilitas tertentu yang istimewa di dalam sel, hanya dapat dinikmati sebagian orang kaya. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan tersebut, dapat dilakukan pencegahan dan penanggulangan melalui kebijakan kriminal, yaitu melalui sarana penal dan non penal. 
Implikasi Yuridis Kebijakan Formulasi Alat Bukti Elektronik Eko Surya Prasetyo; Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun; Halif Halif
Lentera Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v5i2.7469

Abstract

Formulation policy occupies a strategic role in the efforts to eradicate criminal acts, as law enforcers are bounded by prevailing laws and regulations. The issue of article formulation is only the surface of the problem when using electronic evidence in practice. The Law Number 31, Year 1999, on Corruption Criminal Act acknowledges electronic evidence as an extension of “petunjuk”, while in The Law Number 8 Year 2010, the Money Laundering Criminal Act, electronic evidence is recognized as an independent instrument of evidence. This article examines the underlying reasons for differences in formulation policy, in terms of the legislator's rationales. This article will also expose juridical implications for the recognition of electronic evidence in both acts. The article uses normative yudiris-legal research that analyses law through a building norm system. Based on legislative review, by tracking the legislation rationale, it is found that there is no fundamental reason for the classification, but it is only a legal policy because of legislation Based on the conceptual study, it is understood that electronic evidence, “petunjuk”, is weaker than independent evidence. This article concludes with the suggestion to include electronic evidence in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), with a ‘stand-alone’ position that is not part of other evidence. Keywords: Formulation Policy, Electronic Evidence
Tindak Pidana Kelalaian Menyebabkan Luka yang Dilakukan oleh Dokter Gigi: Analisis Putusan Nomor: 257/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dps Selly Ismi Qomariyah; Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun; Sapti Prihatmini
Lentera Hukum Vol 5 No 3 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v5i1.6761

Abstract

There is a substantial difference between the ordinary crime related to its results and that related to its causes. In order to classified as a crime, the negligence carried out by medical personnel needs to be previously described regarding the fulfillment of the elements of lawlessness. This paper analyzes whether there is medical malpractice and with the following lawlessness in the court decision number 257/Pid.B/2015/PN.Dps. Throughout the analysis, it will provide a comprehension to the qualification of whether malpractice, medical negligence or medical risk. The result of the study finds that such a crime can be qualified to medical malpractice, even though he did not fulfill the nature against formal law but it meets the element of nature against material law. Keywords: Medical Malpractice, Lawlessness, Crime
PERANAN AUTOPSI FORENSIK DAN KORELASINYA DENGAN KASUS KEMATIAN TIDAK WAJAR Widowati Widowati; Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun; Fiska Maulidian Nugroho; Samsudi Samsudi; Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (271.119 KB) | DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2021.v6.i1.p1-18

Abstract

A forensic autopsy aims to find a definite cause of a person’s death by revealing the material truth scientifically from the beginning of case investigation to its trial examination. In judicial practices, a forensic autopsy is considered a pivotal tool in proving material criminal acts. However, KUHP Article 222 and KUHAP Article 133-134 regulate forensic autopsy procedures requiring prior notification to the victim's family. These provisions have hindered law enforcement in certain unnatural death cases. Therefore, this article encourages forensic autopsy implementation must not wait for a family consent of a victim for the sake of fair legal certainty to the victims, perpetrators, and also for society.
Analisis Yuridis Manajemen Kerahasiaan Visum Et Repertum Tindak Pidana Kesusilaan Di Rumah Sakit Bhayangkara Bondowoso Achmad Jaelani Rusdi; Ancah Caesarina Novi M; Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun
Multidisciplinary Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2019): Juli 2019
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (924.863 KB) | DOI: 10.19184/multijournal.v2i1.20105

Abstract

confidentiality management of Visum et Repertum (VeR) is compulsory for health service facility as the executor and guarantor for its patient medical confidentiality that, VeR is executed merely by the authorities. Bhayangkara Hospital in Bondowoso is an institution under State Police of The Republic of Indonesia that is responsible for police medical administration including VeR. With regard to this, it is crucial that VeR confidentiality management should meet the regulation concerning victim’s privacy rights as the patient in health facility. Qualitative method was employed with empirical juridical approach obtained from observation and in depth interview with 11 informants determined by purposive sampling. The research findings reveals that the urgent of VeR confidentiality of the victims of decency crime adheres the Law of Witness and Victim Protection, law of child protection and Law of domestic violence. The VeR of the victim of decency crime in Bhayangkara Hospital in Bondowoso has obeyed the law in terms of victim confidentiality, management of execution, report and VeR medical records of decency crime. However, based on Law on Hospital and Ministry of Health’s Regulation on Medical Records, it is mentioned that Medical Records Unit is also supposed to be responsible for the management, reports, and VeR recording in Bhayangkara Hospital Bondowoso.Keywords: Management, confidentiality, decency crime, hospital, VeR
KESAKSIAN AHLI JIWA DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN BERAT Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 8, No 1 (2015): DIALEKTIKA HUKUM NEGARA DAN AGAMA
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v8i1.36

Abstract

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 210/Pid.B/2005/PN.RKB memeriksa kasus penganiayaan berat yang berakibat matinya orang lain karena terdakwa mengalami halusinasi visual. Halusinasi visual termasuk ke dalam kategori gangguan jiwa, tetapi pemeriksaan kejiwaan oleh psikolog diberikan secara tertulis, tanpa second opinion ahli jiwa lain. Pentingnya kesaksian ahli jiwa dalam pemeriksaan Putusan Nomor 210/Pid.B/2005/PN.RKB akan berimplikasi pada penjatuhan sanksi tindakan yang dapat dikaji dari tujuan pemidanaan. Metode penulisan yang digunakan berbasis pada penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan sumber data sekunder. Permasalahan dikaji menggunakan pendekatan kasus Putusan Nomor 210/Pid.B/2005/PN.RKB yang diperbandingkan dengan Putusan Nomor 998/Pid.B/2006/PN.BDG dengan analisis data secara kualitatif. Hakim memutus perkara menggunakan keterangan tertulis seorang psikolog tanpa adanya ahli jiwa lain; sedangkan halusinasi visual merupakan gangguan jiwa yang seharusnya ditentukan oleh ahli jiwa. Dalam pemeriksaan di persidangan terbukti adanya penganiayaan berat yang berakibat matinya korban, sehingga hakim memutus sanksi pidana penjara selama tujuh bulan delapan hari. Penjatuhan tindakan dimasukkan ke dalam rumah sakit jiwa lebih tepat daripada pidana penjara pendek jika ditinjau dari perspektif tujuan pemidanaan. Kesimpulan sebagai akhirpenulisan adalah kesaksian ahli jiwa berperan penting dalam pemeriksaan Putusan Nomor 210/Pid.B/2005/PN.RKB, dan ditinjau dari aspek tujuan pemidanaan, sanksi tindakan dimasukkan ke dalam rumah sakit jiwa lebih tepat dijatuhkan terhadap terdakwa dalam Putusan Nomor 210/Pid.B/2005/PN.RKB.Kata kunci: keterangan ahli jiwa; tanggung jawab pidana; penganiayaan berat. ABSTRACTThe Decision Number 210/Pid.B/2005/PN.RKB examines the case of aggravated assault causing the death of the victim committed by the defendant who is having visual hallucinations. Such hallucinations belong to the categories of mental disorder, but this conclusion is merely based on a written psychological examination without any second opinion from another mental health professional. The psychiatric expert testimony (mentalhealth professional) in the examination of this case shall be of profound significance to implicate the imposition of the sentence, which shall be viewed from the purpose of punishment. The method of analysis deployed is normative legal research by using sources of secondary data. The issues are elaborated through case-based approach by comparing the Decision Number 210/Pid.B/2005/PN.RKB to the Decision Number 998/Pid.B/2006/PN.BDG by using a qualitative data analysis. The judge decides the case using the psychologist’s written statements without any additional from other expert testimony of mental health professionals. The visual hallucination is a mental disorder that should beprescribed by a mental health professional. In the trial proceedings, an aggravated assault causing the death of the victim is proven, thereof, the judge imposes seven months and eight days imprisonment to the defendant From the perspective of the punishment  objective, sending the defendant to a mental hospital seems to be more appropriate rather than imposing a sentence of short-term imprisonment. On the whole, the analysis concludes that the psychiatric expert testimony is greatly significant in the examination of the Case Decision Number 210/Pid.B/2005/PN.RKB, and through the purpose of  punishment opinion, sending the defendant to a mental hospital is a proper final decision.Keywords: psychiatric expert testimony; criminal liability; aggravated assault.
URGENSI BEDAH MAYAT FORENSIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 9, No 1 (2016): DIVERGENSI TAFSIR
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v9i1.32

Abstract

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 79/Pid.B/2012/PN.BGR memutuskan tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana secara bersama-sama terhadap empat orang terdakwa. Tindak pidanapembunuhan sebagai delik materiil melarang akibat perbuatan menghilangkan nyawa orang lain, sehingga haruslah dapat dibuktikan adanya hubungan kausal antara perbuatan setiap terdakwa yang mengakibatkan kematian korban. Namun demikian, visum et repertum sebagai alat bukti surat dalam pemeriksaan Putusan Nomor 79/Pid.B/2012/PN.BGR tidak dapat menyimpulkan penyebab kematian korban, karena tidak dilakukan bedah mayat forensik. Adanya hubungan kausal antara perbuatan dengan akibatnya di dalam delik materiil, dapat berkorelasi dengan pertanggungjawaban pidana. Bedah mayat forensik atas tindak pidana pembunuhan yang dilakukan secara bersama-sama merupakan syarat yang bersifat conditio sine qua non, dalam menentukan pertanggungjawaban pidana. Posisi urgen bedah mayat forensik dalam pembuatan visum et repertum merupakan fokus dari penelitian ini. Adapun metode penulisan berbasis pada penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan sumber data sekunder. Data penelitian berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif, yaitu penelitian hukum kualitatif (qualitative-legal research). Dari aspek hukum pidana, pemeriksaan bedah mayat forensik bermanfaat untuk mengetahui penyebab pasti kematian korban yang berhubungan dengan pertanggungjawaban pidana.Kata kunci: pembunuhan berencana, bedah mayat forensik, visum et repertum, pertanggungjawaban pidana.ABSTRACTCourt Decision Number 79/Pid.B/2012/PN.BGR prosecutes a criminal case of premeditated murder committed jointly by four convicts. Crimes of murder as a material offense, prohibiting a result of the act of taking the life of others, therefore, a causal connection between the actions of each convict that caused the death of the victim shall be proved. However, visum et repertum as the documentary evidence in the case investigation ofthe Court Decision Number 79/Pid.B/2012/PN.BGR cannot reveal the cause of death since the forensic post-mortem examination was not carried out. Causal connection between the act and result in material offense correlates with criminal liability. Forensic post-mortemexamination of murder crime jointly committed is a requirement of “conditio sine qua non” in determining criminal liability. The forensic post-mortem examination to acquire visum et repertum is the emphasis of this analysis. This analysis applies normative legal researchmethod by using secondary data sources. The research data is in the form of primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary. The data are studied through qualitative-legal research. From the aspect of criminal law, forensic post-mortem examination is used to determine the cause of death of the victim that relates to criminal liability. Keywords: premeditated murder, post-mortem forensic examination, visum et repertum, criminal liability.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PUTUSAN YANG MELANGGAR SPECIAL STRAF MAXIMA Widowati Widowati; Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 14, No 1 (2021): OPINIO JURIS SIVE NECESSITATIS
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v14i1.413

Abstract

ABSTRAKTindak pidana penipuan atau penggelapan merupakan dakwaan alternatif yang dibuat oleh penuntut umum dalam Putusan Nomor 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd. Dalam pertimbangannya hakim membuktikan unsur-unsur tindak pidana penipuan; namun demikian dalam amar putusannya menyatakan bahwa terdakwa bersalah melakukan tindak pidana penggelapan. Sanksi pidana penjara 10 tahun yang dijatuhkan terhadap terdakwa menyimpangi special straf maxima. Rumusan masalah dalam tulisan ini, apakah amar Putusan Nomor 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd yang melanggar “asas” special straf maxima telah memenuhi asas kepastian hukum yang adil? Metode yuridis normatif digunakan dalam penulisan ini. Sumber data diperoleh dari data sekunder yang meliputi bahan hukum primer, dan bahan hukum sekunder. Putusan Nomor 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd seharusnya batal demi hukum, karena tidak terpenuhinya syarat formalitas putusan sebagaimana ditentukan Pasal 197 ayat (1) KUHAP. Di samping itu, penjatuhan sanksi pidana penjara selama 10 tahun melanggar ketentuan special straf maxima, dan melanggar kepastian hukum yang adil. Namun, berdasarkan asas res judicata pro veritate habetur, apapun putusan hakim harus dianggap benar sampai ada putusan hakim yang lebih tinggi yang menyatakan sebaliknya. Kata kunci: special straf maxima; tindak pidana penipuan; tindak pidana penggelapan. ABSTRACTFraud or embezzlement is an alternative indictment made by the public prosecutor in Decision Number 306/ Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd. In the judge’s consideration, all elements of the criminal act of fraud have been successfully proven; however, in the conviction it was stated that the defendant was guilty of the crime of embezzlement. The 10 years imprisonment imposed on the defendant violated the special straf maxima “principle”. The formulation of the problem to analyze is whether the sentencing in the Decision Number 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd violating principle has met the principle of fair-legal certainty. This paper uses normative juridical method and obtain data sources from secondary data including primary and secondary legal material. Decision Number 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd should be null and void, because it did not meet the formal requirements of the decision as stipulated in Article 197 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. In addition, the imposition of imprisonment for 10 years violates the principle of the special straf maxima and fair legal certainty. However, based on the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur, the judge’s decision whatsoever must be deliberated truthful until there is a decision of a superior judge which states otherwise. Keywords: special straf maxima; fraud; embezzlement. 
Co-Authors ACHMAD JAELANI RUSDI Ainul Azizah Al Khanif Ancah Caesarina Novi Marchianti Chosya Sheila Aprilliana Arimbhi Dodik Prihatin A.N. Dominikus Rato Eko Surya Prasetyo Fiska Maulidian Nugroho Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi Halif, Halif Heru Iskandar Jadmiko, Widhi Muhammad Abi Aufa Muhammad Syauqun Adhim Prihatmini, Sapti Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samsudi Samuel Saut Martua Samosir Selly Ismi Qomariyah Surjanti, Surjanti Vicko Taniady Widowati, Widowati