Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal INTERDISIPLIN: Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Regulate: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Hukum dan Bisnis Classroom: Journal of Islamic Education
Tedi Priatna
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
A Comparative Analysis of Experimental Research Designs: Pre-Experimental, Quasi-Experimental, and True Experimental in the Development of Islamic Religious Education Research Tedi Priatna; Bayu Bambang Nurfauji; Eli Setia Mukti Sari; Nia Nurmalasari; Shannaz Syahida Fadhilah Andhini
Classroom: Journal of Islamic Education Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Penerbit Hellow Pustaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61166/classroom.v3i1.57

Abstract

This study aims to comparatively analyze experimental research designs, namely Pre-Experimental Design, Quasi Experimental Design, and True Experimental Design, in the development of Islamic Religious Education (IRE) research. The method employed is a library research approach using descriptive-comparative analysis of relevant books, scientific articles, and academic references. The analysis focuses on the characteristics, strengths, weaknesses, validity levels, and applications of each experimental design in IRE research. The findings indicate that Pre-Experimental Design is suitable for preliminary studies with limited control over variables, although it has low internal validity. Quasi Experimental Design provides a balance between research control and real educational settings, making it widely used in educational research. Meanwhile, True Experimental Design offers the highest level of internal validity through the implementation of randomization and strict control groups. In conclusion, the selection of an experimental design in Islamic Religious Education research should be adjusted to research objectives, participant conditions, and available resources in order to produce valid, reliable, and meaningful findings for the advancement of IRE studies.
Paradigma Positivistik, Konstruktivistik, dan Pragmatik dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Tedi Priatna; Bayu Bambang Nur Fauzi; Amilia Fitri; Azka Izzati Suryani; Maryam Dwi Lestari; Sinta Niasti
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 11 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17919722

Abstract

This article examines three main paradigms in educational research: positivist, constructivist, and pragmatic, with a focus on their ontological, epistemological, and methodological foundations. Using a conceptual study approach, this review maps the characteristics, strengths, and limitations of each paradigm and their relevance in improving the quality of educational research. The positivist paradigm emphasizes objectivity and a quantitative approach to uncover cause-and-effect relationships. The constructivist paradigm focuses on gaining deep understanding of meaning and experience through flexible qualitative methods. Meanwhile, the pragmatic paradigm prioritizes practical usefulness through adaptive mixed methods. The study finds that selecting the appropriate paradigm, aligned with the research objectives, can produce valid, relevant findings that impact educational development. This review provides guidance for researchers to design studies that are reflective and responsive to field needs.
Tinjauan Metodologi dan Etika Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Metode Campuran Tedi Priatna; Bayu Bambang Nur Fauzi; Dian Febriyanti; Ilham Hidayatul Ramadhani; M. Rafi Gastiadirrijal; Nabila Putri Aulia
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 11 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17933261

Abstract

This article aims to comprehensively review the basics of educational research including quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods research, as well as research ethics. Using the methods of literature study and content analysis, the realities of educational research are decomposed through a conceptual review. The results of the study show that the quantitative approach is based on the philosophy of positivism, focuses on the measurement of numbers, and produces cause-and-effect generalizations. Qualitative research is grounded in constructivism, emphasizes on understanding deep meaning, and is narratively descriptive in nature. Meanwhile, mixed methods integrate both approaches to find practical solutions. Research ethics demands that researchers uphold scientific honesty, objectivity, and respect participants’ rights, such as informed consent and data confidentiality. A strong understanding of these fundamentals is essential for prospective educators, particularly PAI students, as a provision for scholarly skills in both academic and teaching practice
A Study of Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Data Analysis Techniques in Indonesian National Journal Articles: Systematic Literature Review Muhammad Raihan As Syauqi; Bayu Bambang Nurfauji; Harkat Hadi Saputra; Yohanna Zuriyah; Tedi Priatna
INTERDISIPLIN: Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Penerbit Hellow Pustaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61166/interdisiplin.v3i1.144

Abstract

Data analysis techniques play a crucial role in scientific research as they determine the validity and quality of research findings. Recent developments in Indonesian research indicate an increasing diversity in the use of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed data analysis techniques. Therefore, a comprehensive review is required to systematically examine these developments. This study aims to analyze quantitative and qualitative data analysis techniques used in Indonesian national journal articles. The research employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method by examining national journal articles published in Indonesia from 2021 to 2025. The SLR process was conducted through several stages, including the formulation of research questions, systematic literature searching, article selection based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data synthesis and analysis. The results indicate that quantitative data analysis techniques remain dominant, particularly descriptive statistics, regression analysis, correlation analysis, and analysis of variance. Meanwhile, qualitative data analysis techniques such as thematic analysis, narrative analysis, and content analysis are widely used to obtain an in-depth understanding of research phenomena. In addition, the use of mixed methods approaches has shown a growing trend, as they provide more comprehensive and robust research findings. This study is expected to serve as a methodological reference for researchers in selecting appropriate data analysis techniques based on research objectives and data characteristics.
Action Research Methodology in Educational Research: A Critical Review of the Evolution of Concepts, Models, Implementation, and Contemporary Challenges Soni Sultansah; Yohanna Zuriyah; Nur Sholehah; Bayu Bambang Nurfauji; Tedi Priatna
Regulate: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Hukum dan Bisnis Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Penerbit Hellow Pustaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61166/regulate.v3i2.80

Abstract

Action Research is a research methodology oriented toward improving practice through cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection. This article aims to critically analyze the conceptual evolution, model development, implementation, and contemporary challenges of Action Research within educational research. The study employs a Critical Literature Review (CLR) approach, analyzing relevant scholarly literature through processes of identification, selection, evaluation, and thematic synthesis. The findings indicate that Action Research has evolved from a practical problem-solving approach into a methodology that is reflective, collaborative, and focused on developing evidence-based educational practices. Its implementation contributes to enhancing the quality of learning, teacher professionalism, and educational innovation. However, its application still faces various challenges, including limited methodological competence, difficulties in conducting literature reviews and identifying research gaps, heavy administrative burdens, and pressures regarding scholarly publication and adaptation to digital technology. Therefore, strengthening research competence, fostering a culture of reflection and professional collaboration, and utilizing technology ethically are crucial factors in improving the quality of Action Research implementation. This article is intended to serve as a conceptual reference for researchers, academics, and educational practitioners in developing action research that is more systematic, innovative, and relevant to the dynamics of education.
Co-Authors Amilia Fitri Azka Izzati Suryani Bayu Bambang Nur Fauzi Bayu Bambang Nurfauji Dian Febriyanti Eli Setia Mukti Sari Harkat Hadi Saputra Ilham Hidayatul Ramadhani M. Rafi Gastiadirrijal Maryam Dwi Lestari Muhammad Raihan As Syauqi Nabila Putri Aulia Nia Nurmalasari Nur Sholehah Shannaz Syahida Fadhilah Andhini Sinta Niasti Soni Sultansah Yohanna Zuriyah