Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Tanfizi : Journal of Islamic Constitutional and Political Law
Sri Rahmadhani
Universitas Andalas
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Digital Behaviorism among Muslim Communities on Social Media from the Perspective of Islamic Law Firdaus Arifin; Deni Fadly; Habibul Akhiar; Damarkunsi Majasius; Sri Rahmadhani
Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): HAKAMAIN: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Publisher : Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v4i1.1360

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the transformation of Islamic law in response to the growing influence of digital behaviorism within modern Muslim communities, particularly through behavioral patterns observed on social media platforms such as Facebook and X (formerly Twitter). Digital behaviorism, rooted in classical behaviorist theories of Watson and Skinner, interprets human actions as stimulus-response mechanisms. In the digital era, this concept has evolved into data-driven models powered by algorithms that track, predict, and influence user behavior. Using a qualitative approach enhanced by big data analysis, this research collects and examines digital user interactions through sentiment analysis, metadata tracking, and keyword mapping related to religious expressions, ethical judgments, and social engagement. The findings show that digital behaviorism reduces human conduct to observable patterns and external stimuli, excluding key Islamic legal concepts such as niyyah (intention), ikhtiyar (free will), and taklif (moral responsibility). This creates a fundamental epistemological conflict with Islamic law, which views human beings as spiritual and moral agents accountable to divine guidance. The study concludes that while digital behaviorism provides useful insights for understanding contemporary social behavior, it cannot be used as a foundational framework for Islamic legal reasoning. Instead, it should serve as a supplementary analytical tool that supports a broader, value-based legal framework rooted in the objectives of Islamic law (maqasid al-shariah). The academic contribution of this research lies in its proposal for an integrative model that bridges modern behavioral science and Islamic jurisprudence, offering a responsive and ethically grounded legal approach in the digital age.
Public Information Disclosure Under Law No. 14 of 2008: Strengthening Transparency, Accountability, and Public Participation Firdaus Arifin; Irvan Refliandi; Sri Rahmadhani
Tanfizi : Journal of Islamic Constitutional and Political Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/tanfizi.v2i1.10615

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of public information disclosure in Indonesia under Law No. 14 of 2008 on Public Information Disclosure and to analyze its role in strengthening transparency, accountability, and public participation in governance. The study employs a normative-empirical legal research design, combining statutory and conceptual approaches to examine legal provisions and their implementation in institutional practice. Data were obtained from relevant laws and regulations, scholarly literature, official documents, and semi-structured interviews with government officials and members of the public involved in or affected by public information disclosure. The data were analyzed qualitatively through reduction, classification, interpretation, and synthesis, supported by source triangulation. The findings show that Law No. 14 of 2008 provides a significant legal foundation for ensuring citizens’ access to public information and strengthening public oversight. However, its implementation remains affected by institutional commitment, information management practices, accessibility, and administrative constraints. The findings also demonstrate that effective information disclosure enables citizens to monitor government activities, evaluate public services and policies, and participate in public decision-making. The study concludes that public information disclosure should not be treated merely as an administrative obligation but as an essential mechanism of transparent, accountable, and participatory governance. The contribution of this study lies in integrating normative legal analysis with empirical evidence to identify the gap between legal guarantees and institutional practices, while conceptually emphasizing information disclosure as a mechanism connecting the right to information with public oversight, institutional accountability, and meaningful participation in governance.
Metode Penafsiran Hukum Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Model Keserentakan Pemilu Dalam Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional dan Pemilu Lokal Sri Rahmadhani; Khairul Fahmi; Yuliandri
UNES Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/3zqj1f71

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis pergeseran metode penafsiran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menentukan model keserentakan pemilu serta implikasinya terhadap asas keberkalaan pemilu dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Permasalahan penelitian meliputi: (1) metode penafsiran yang digunakan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam pengujian Undang-Undang Pemilihan Umum terkait model keserentakan pemilu; dan (2) implikasi pergeseran metode penafsiran tersebut terhadap asas keberkalaan pemilu. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya pergeseran metode penafsiran Mahkamah Konstitusi dari pendekatan originalism melalui metode original intent menuju pendekatan non-originalism melalui metode ethical. Pergeseran tersebut didasarkan pada pertimbangan mengenai ketidakefektifan penyelenggaraan pemilu akibat jarak waktu yang terlalu singkat antara pemilu nasional dan pemilu daerah, beban psikologis pemilih, serta keterbatasan partai politik dalam mempersiapkan kader. Melalui putusan terbarunya, Mahkamah Konstitusi memisahkan penyelenggaraan pemilu nasional dan pemilu daerah dengan rentang waktu pemilu daerah paling singkat 2 (dua) tahun atau paling lama 2 (dua) tahun 6 (enam) bulan setelah pemilu nasional. Pemisahan tersebut berimplikasi terhadap penerapan asas keberkalaan pemilu sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 22E ayat (1) UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Kondisi ini memberikan waktu yang lebih memadai bagi penyelenggara pemilu dalam mempersiapkan tahapan pemilu, bagi pemilih untuk menentukan pilihan secara lebih terfokus, serta bagi partai politik untuk mempersiapkan kader dalam pemilu nasional dan pemilu daerah.
Co-Authors Damarkunsi Majasius Deni Fadly Firdaus Arifin Habibul Akhiar Irvan Refliandi Yuliandri