Andi Huzaifa
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Paradigma Ekoteosentris dalam Penanggulangan Sampah Darat Perspektif Hukum Islam Nurhildawati N; Andi Huzaifa; Azman Arsyad; Lomba Sultan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): October 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21442424

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the problem of land waste in Indonesia, examine the essence of the ecotheocentric paradigm as an environmental ethic, and explain its implications for waste management from the perspective of Islamic law. This research employed a qualitative library research approach using the Qur'an, Hadith, books, scientific articles, legislation, and other relevant literature as data sources. The data were analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings reveal that Indonesia's waste problem is caused not only by increasing waste generation, inadequate infrastructure, and weak regulatory implementation but also by an anthropocentric paradigm that encourages environmental exploitation. The ecotheocentric paradigm offers a comprehensive ethical framework by integrating the relationship between God, humans, and nature, positioning environmental preservation as both a religious mandate and an ecological responsibility. From the perspective of Islamic law, this paradigm reinforces the principles of khalifah, amanah, m?z?n, and maq??id al-shar?'ah through the promotion of public benefit and the prevention of environmental harm. Therefore, effective waste management requires not only technical measures but also the transformation of moral and spiritual awareness to achieve sustainable environmental stewardship.
Witness Testimony in the Law of Evidence: A Comparative Analysis of Fuqaha Perspectives and Civil Law Rahmatul Qadri; Andi Huzaifa; Abdul Halim Talli; Asni
International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR) 2026: Volume 7 Issue 2
Publisher : Indonesian Academy of Social and Religious Research (IASRR)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53639/ijssr.v7i2.417

Abstract

The determination of the evidentiary value of witness testimony depends not only on the facts presented before the court but also on the legal paradigm through which juridical truth is constructed. This study examines the evidentiary value of witness testimony from the perspectives of fuqaha and civil law to explain the epistemological foundations underlying their different approaches. Employing normative legal research with conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches, this study finds that although both legal traditions recognize witness testimony as an essential means of proof, they adopt different standards for assessing its probative value. Islamic jurisprudence emphasizes the witness's moral credibility (ʿadālah) and legal qualifications, whereas civil law primarily relies on procedural legality and judicial evaluation. These differences demonstrate that the evidentiary value of witness testimony is fundamentally shaped by distinct epistemological conceptions of juridical truth. Accordingly, this study advances an epistemological perspective that enriches comparative scholarship on the law of evidence.