Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.006
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Dyah Permata Budi Asri
Universitas Esa Unggul
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Korporasi Atas Kebocoran Data Peserta BPJS Kesehatan Berdasarkan UU No. 27 Tahun 2022: Penelitian Ridho Rivantoro; Dyah Permata Budi Asri
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 3 (Januari 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4575

Abstract

The massive data breach involving BPJS Kesehatan in 2021 revealed the vulnerability of Indonesia’s digital security ecosystem. Millions of citizens’ personal data appeared on online forums, raising concerns regarding privacy protection and institutional accountability. This incident underscored the urgent need for a comprehensive regulatory framework governing personal data protection. Law No. 27 of 2022 establishes clear obligations for data controllers and affirms the rights of data subjects, including individuals whose information is processed by public institutions such as BPJS Kesehatan. This study examines the legal responsibilities of BPJS Kesehatan as a public corporation in managing participants’ personal data, and explores the legal implications arising from negligence that results in data breaches. A normative legal approach is applied through statutory analysis and examination of academic literature. Findings show that BPJS Kesehatan bears substantial obligations as a data controller under the Personal Data Protection Law, including ensuring data security, maintaining transparency, and implementing proper data governance mechanisms. The 2021 breach demonstrated significant gaps in digital security infrastructure that affected public trust and exposed potential legal liabilities. The PDP Law provides administrative, civil, and criminal consequences for violations committed by data controllers. Strengthening of security, compliance, and internal audits is necessary to prevent recurrence of incidents.
Kegagalan Asean dalam Menanggulangi Judi Online: Perspektif Regional Security Complex Theory: Penelitian Dion Gerald Novianto; Dyah Permata Budi Asri
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 3 (Januari 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.5185

Abstract

Dalam penelitian ini, Regional Security Complex Theory (RSCT) digunakan untuk menganalisis kegagalan ASEAN dalam menangani perjudian daring lintas negara. Digitalisasi yang pesat, perbedaan regulasi antarnegara, serta lemahnya koordinasi keamanan siber telah berkontribusi terhadap berkembangnya praktik perjudian daring di Asia Tenggara. Jaringan kriminal memanfaatkan perbedaan yurisdiksi, keterbatasan infrastruktur digital, dan lemahnya penegakan hukum untuk beroperasi secara transnasional. Dari perspektif RSCT, kegagalan tersebut mencerminkan kondisi undersecuritization, yaitu ketika negara-negara anggota ASEAN belum sepenuhnya memandang kejahatan siber dan perjudian daring sebagai ancaman regional bersama. Akibatnya, tidak terbentuk agenda keamanan kolektif yang kuat. Kondisi ini menyebabkan ASEAN belum mampu membangun kerangka regional yang komprehensif dalam hal penegakan hukum, pertukaran intelijen, dan harmonisasi kebijakan digital karena adanya perbedaan regulasi dan kapasitas negara. Situasi tersebut membuka ruang bagi sindikat perjudian daring untuk terus berkembang, yang pada gilirannya melemahkan stabilitas kawasan melalui peningkatan kejahatan digital, menurunnya kepercayaan publik, meningkatnya kerentanan ekonomi, serta potensi munculnya ketegangan antarnegara. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa respons pada tingkat nasional saja tidak memadai untuk menghadapi ancaman siber lintas batas. Oleh karena itu, ASEAN perlu memperkuat kerja sama regional melalui harmonisasi hukum siber, peningkatan mekanisme penegakan hukum lintas negara, penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan digital, serta perluasan koordinasi intelijen regional guna meningkatkan ketahanan dan merespons ancaman siber yang terus berkembang secara efektif.
Perlindungan Hak Keperdataan atas Tanah bagi Masyarakat Adat dalam Konflik Rempang Ditinjau dari Prinsip Negara Hukum Assyahra Suci Oktaviani; Irmanjaya Thaher; Dyah Permata Budi Asri
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 3 (2026): Tema Hukum Adat dan Kebiasaan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i3.4395

Abstract

The land conflict on Rempang Island, triggered by the national strategic project development of Rempang Eco-City, has sparked a sharp juridical debate between the aspects of state power (Machtsstaat) through investment policy instruments and the principles of the Rule of Law (Rechtsstaat) which emphasizes individual rights protection. This study aims to analyze the root causes of overlapping juridical claims between the Land Management Rights (HPL) held by BP Batam and the traditional physical land possession of the Rempang indigenous community based on the concept of the State's Right to Control (HMN), as well as to examine the legal standing and protection of uncertified land civil rights of the indigenous community viewed from the pillar of substantive justice in a Rule of Law. The research method applied is normative legal research utilizing a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The secondary data, consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, were collected through literature review and analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that the overlapping claims occurred due to the government's unilateral issuance of HPL over customary lands (tanah ulayat) that had been physically possessed peacefully, openly and generationally by the indigenous peoples (the Malay, Orang Laut and Orang Darat tribes) long before BP Batam or modern regulations were established. Within the perspective of substantive justice under the Rule of Law and the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), a land certificate is not the absolute source of rights but merely an administrative proof; thus, long-term physical possession in good faith (bezit/rechtsverwerking) by indigenous peoples constitutes a legally valid civil right that is constitutionally protected under Article 18B Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. Consequently, the civil legal protection for the Rempang indigenous community must be fulfilled through equal deliberation mechanisms (the right to consent or object to the project), fair compensation (covering both material and immaterial losses), or the granting of Communal Ownership Rights/land-sharing schemes to ensure that the indigenous people are treated as subjects of development rather than objects of land eviction for investor interests.
Managed Judicial Activism: Balancing Judicial Activism and Restraint in Constitutional Court Decisions, 2024-2025 Irmanjaya Thaher; Dyah Permata Budi Asri
Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): HAKAMAIN: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Publisher : Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v3i2.1772

Abstract

This article examines the practices of judicial restraint and judicial activism in the decisions of the Indonesian Constitutional Court (MK) for the 2024–2025 period, by integrating the academic discourse published in the MKRI Constitutional Journal (2025), institutional statements by Minister of Law and Human Rights Yusril Ihza Mahendra emphasizing judicial restraint as a form of judicial maturity, and the historical precedent set by Mahfud MD in the KPK wiretapping case as a landmark example of judicial activism in Indonesia. The study was conducted by comparatively analyzing theories of judicial activism and restraint, mapping the spectrum between the two approaches, and applying this analytical framework to the Constitutional Court’s most significant decisions during the 2024–2025 period. This article argues that the activism–restraint dichotomy is a continuum, not a categorical one, and that the Indonesian Constitutional Court, in the dynamics of its rulings, moves between these two poles contextually, depending on the issues at hand, the composition of the panel, and the surrounding political pressures.
The Legal Status of the Parties to a Joint Operating Agreement (KSO) Based on the Principle of ‘Pacta Sunt Servanda’ (Case Study: Court Judgment No. 391/Pdt.G./2024/Pn. Jkt.Utr.) Melinda Endarti; Annisa Fitria; Dyah Permata Budi Asri; Rita Alfiana
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3736

Abstract

An Operational Cooperation Agreement (KSO) is a form of unnamed contract (innominate contract) that has developed in accordance with the principle of freedom of contract as set out in the Civil Code. In practice, KSOs often give rise to disputes due to the failure of the parties to fulfil their rights and obligations. This study aims to analyse the legal status of the Operational Cooperation Agreement (KSO), the forms of breach of contract, and the legal consequences arising therefrom based on Judgment No. 391/Pdt.G./2024/PN Jkt.Utr. The study employs a normative legal method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case-based approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, which were analysed qualitatively through deductive reasoning. The results of the study indicate that an Operational Cooperation Agreement (KSO) is legally binding in accordance with the provisions of Article 1338 of the Civil Code; consequently, the parties are obliged to fulfil the terms of the agreement in good faith. Breach of contract in this case occurred because one party failed to fulfil its agreed obligations, thereby causing loss to the other party. The court’s ruling confirms that a breach of the terms of a contract gives rise to legal liability in the form of an obligation to pay damages in accordance with the provisions of civil law. It is hoped that this research will contribute to the development of contract law, particularly with regard to the resolution of disputes arising from Production Sharing Agreements in Indonesia.
Validity and Legal Consequences of Peace Agreements in The Settlement of Sexual Harassment Cases Hartoto Suci Rahayu; Markoni; Dyah Permata Budi Asri; I Made Kanthika; Tuti Elawati
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3102

Abstract

The settlement of sexual harassment cases through peace agreements based on contracts remains a practice commonly found in society. This practice raises complex legal issues as it lies at the intersection of civil law and criminal law. On one hand, civil law recognizes contracts as legally binding instruments provided that the legal requirements of validity are fulfilled. On the other hand, sexual harassment constitutes a criminal offense, meaning that its resolution cannot rely solely on the agreement of the parties involved. This study aims to analyze the settlement of sexual harassment cases through contractual peace agreements from the perspectives of civil law and criminal law. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials consist of primary and secondary sources, which are analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that peace agreements in sexual harassment cases may be considered legally valid only if they fulfill the legal requirements of a contract, particularly the existence of free consent and a lawful cause. From a criminal law perspective, a peace agreement between the perpetrator and the victim does not eliminate the unlawful nature of sexual harassment, as such acts involve public legal interests protected by the state. Therefore, peace agreements may only operate within the civil law domain and cannot be used as a basis to negate criminal law enforcement processes.
Co-Authors Alfiana, Rita Annisa Fitria Assyahra Suci Oktaviani Dion Gerald Novianto Elawati, Tuti Hartoto Suci Rahayu I Made Kanthika Irmanjaya Thaher Markoni Melinda Endarti Ridho Rivantoro