Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Korporasi di Bidang Lingkungan Hidup: Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Batam Nomor 932/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Btm Dekky Tiara Pra Setia; Markoni Markoni; Wasis Susetio; I Made Kanthika
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): July : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i4.329

Environmental damage in Indonesia is getting worse day by day. This condition has directly threatened human life. Environmental law enforcement is an action and/or process of coercion to comply with the law which is based on the provisions of statutory regulations. The aim of this research is to analyze efforts to resolve cases against corporations that damage the environment in Indonesia. Case Study Batam District Court Decision Number 932/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Btm. The method used in this research is normative juridical, namely library legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. The results of his research are that law enforcement against corporations that damage the environment can be subject to criminal sanctions, administrative sanctions, and civil lawsuits can also be filed by the government. This is regulated in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. The criminal sanctions received by PT. Kayla Alam Sentosa, who has intentionally committed an act that results in exceeding the Standard Criteria for Environmental Damage, is subject to a fine of Rp. 6,000,000,000,- (six billion rupiah). The conclusion is that criminal liability for corporations as perpetrators of environmental crimes is also subject to criminal penalties, apart from criminal penalties, they can also be subject to administrative sanctions, namely in the form of revocation of business permits. If it is deemed that the impact of environmental damage is greater than the criminal fine imposed, the corporation can also be sued civilly.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KREDITOR SEPARATIS TERHADAP JAMINAN KEBENDAAN PIHAK KETIGA DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN (STUDI KASUS PERKARA KEPAILITAN NOMOR : 21/PDT.SUS.GUGATAN LAIN-LAIN/2019/PN.NIAGA SBY., JUNCTO PERKARA NOMOR : 18/PDT.SUS/PKPU/2018/PN.SBY Subagyo, Heri; I Made Kanthika
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 8 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : LPPM, Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v8i2.4953

Creditors are classified into three categories, namely separatist creditors, preferred creditors, and concurrent creditors. This is different from the classification in general civil law, where creditors are only classified into two, namely preferred and concurrent creditors. Separatist Creditors, namely creditors whose receivables are guaranteed and bound by material guarantees such as Mortgage, Mortgage, Pledge and Fiduciary. Separatist creditors or Secure Creditors can exercise their rights based on the material guarantees they have as if no bankruptcy had occurred, in the case studied it was found that PT. Hardys Retailindo signed a Credit Agreement with Bank J. Trust Indonesia, on May 28, 2012 for Working Capital purposes, which is approximately IDR 140,000,000,000 (One Hundred Forty Billion Rupiah), in this case the Bank. J Trust as a separatist creditor whose debt is guaranteed should get legal and preliminary protection from bankrupt debtors, in this study discusses legal protection for separatist creditors

Principles for Settlement of Manufacturing Business Contract Disputes Iswantoro; I Made Kanthika; Markoni; Zulfikar Judge
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 5 No 5 (2023): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v5i5.945

Manufacturing business contract is agreements that are unique in the procurement of goods and services. Execution of these business contracts often encounters obstacles because there are errors in interpreting contract clauses that can lead to a settlement. After a dispute occurs, what efforts can be made by the parties in resolving disturbances that occur in the procurement of goods, and what is the settlement process if there is a discrepancy in the delivery of goods that are in accordance with the contract but are claimed not to meet the technical specifications stated in the business contract? The purpose of this research is to analyze the manufacturing business contract between Gagah Lambang Perkasa (GLP) and PT Corin Teknik Solusi (CTS). This study used a normative juridical method by reviewing and examining the contents of the agreement. The results show that CTS's failure to interpret the contents of the contract occurred because of the inaccuracy of the technical data on the ordered goods provided by GLP. The efforts made by GLP and CTS to resolve the disputes were by negotiation that prioritized good faith to reach a mutually beneficial agreement. The dispute resolution was achieved with CTS's willingness to accept GLP's claims. GLP provides compensation in the form of additional time, cost, and new orders for CTS so that the agreement can be implemented properly and business relations still run well. The conclusion obtained from this research is that the principle of resolving disputes in invoice business contracts is a mutual benefit (win-win solution) so that the business contract can be continued and not hamper the production process.

Analisis Yuridis Pembuktian Dalam Putusan Hakim Perkara pra Peradilan Studi Kasus Melina Setiaharta Versus Widiatmoko, Arry; Anabertha, Malemna Sura; Kanthika, I Made; Markoni, Markoni
Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Vol. 2 No. 5 (2024): Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal
Publisher : Al Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57185/mutiara.v2i5.184

Praperadilan memiliki arti penting dalam rangka penegakan hukum, melindungi pihak-pihak (tersangka, keluarga atau kuasanya) yang menjadi korban ketidaksewenang-wenangnya aparat penegak hukum baik dalam proses penyelidikan, penyidikan hingga penetapan sebagai tersangka. Putusan Praperadilan Nomor 13/Pid.Pra/2019/PN.JKT.PST permohonan Praperadilan dalam kasus ini termohon sebelumnya tidak menempati janjinya dan memerintahkan termohon untuk mencabut surat ketetapan tentang penghentian penyidikan atas laporan polisi. Dalam putusan ini permohonan pemohon dikabulkan untuk menindaklanjuti tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh termohon. Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif. Karena peneliti berusaha mengkaji perundang-undangan dan peraturan yang berlaku yang berkaitan dengan wewenang lembaga Praperadilan. Kemudian dihubungkan dengan permasalahan yang menjadi pokok pembahasan yang dibahas dalam penulisan skripsi ini sehingga dengan mengkaji undang-undang, peraturan yang berlaku, juga buku-buku yang berkonsep teoritis tersebut dapat menjawab dan menjelaskan permasalahan-permasalahan yang timbul dalam skripsi ini. Dari hasil penelitian diperoleh kseimpulan a. Proses Pembuktian dan dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Praperadilan Nomor 13/PID.PRAP/2019/PN.JKT.PST merupakan merupakan suatu proses yang terjadi saat persidangan yaitu untuk menyakinkan hakim tentang suatu kebenaran dalil atau dalil-dalil yang dikemukan dalam suatu persengketaan. b. Akibat hukum yang timbul dari Putusan Praperadilan dalam Mengabulkan/Gugatan Praperadilan Perkara Pidana dengan menyatakan batal dan tidak sah Penetapan tersangka terhadap laporan kejadian Tindak Pidana Sektor Jasa Keuangan Nomor: LKTP-SJK/7/IV/2019/DPJK, tertanggal 15 April 2019.

Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak Dibawah Umur Dengan Asas Restorative Justice di Lingkungan Polres Belitung Timur Revaldy Nugraha; I Made Kanthika; Markoni Markoni; Helvis Helvis
Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September: Parlementer: Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/parlementer.v1i3.57

Crimes of theft in the family committed by children require special handling by the police, not all cases involving children are resolved through the courts. This is in the best interests of the child and also considers justice for the victim, which is called a restorative justice approach. This research aims to analyze the form of resolution of criminal acts committed by minors in the East Belitung Police area. The results of the research are that the resolution of children's cases that applies restorative justice is guided by Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and the 2012 Political Regulations concerning Restorative Justice, namely the resolution of children's cases outside the criminal court which emphasizes restoring the situation. initially with an emphasis on conditions for creating justice and balance for children and their victims. The conclusion is that the form of resolving criminal acts of theft committed by the East Belitung Police is by implementing restorative justice. Restorative justice carried out by the East Belitung Police aims to accommodate the norms and values that apply in society while providing legal certainty, especially the benefits and a sense of justice that meets the needs of the community. a sense of justice for all parties, which is a manifestation of the National Police's authority in carrying out duties in the field of criminal proceedings and police discretion based on Articles 16 and 18 of Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia.

Legal Analysis of Legal Power and Legal Protection in Informed Consent Practices in High-Risk Surgical Procedures in Hospitals Ediyanto; Markoni; Kanthika, I Made; Asri, Dyah Permata Budi
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 7 No 2 (2025): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v7i2.1443

This research examines the legal force and protective function of informed consent in high-risk surgical procedures, focusing particularly on the latest regulatory framework in Indonesia as stipulated by Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health. Currently, there is a notable absence of specific scholarly examination addressing this issue comprehensively. Although the regulation clearly defines patients’ rights to comprehensive medical information and mandates healthcare providers to deliver it transparently, practical ambiguities remain regarding the extent of informed consent’s binding legal authority and effectiveness in providing legal protection for both patients and medical professionals. Employing a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical methods, the study is primarily based on literature review and analysis of relevant Supreme Court decisions. The central objective of this research is to evaluate the legal enforceability and protective role of informed consent within the context of high-risk surgical treatments. The findings reveal that informed consent possesses substantial legal force derived from contractual principles established between patients and healthcare providers, thereby ensuring mutual legal protection during high-risk medical procedures. Informed consent encompasses preventive measures that aimed at averting potential disputes through clear communication, and repressive measures, which offer legal remedies in cases of violation, thus strengthening accountability and legal certainty within healthcare services.

Kedudukan Hukum Klausul Take Or Pay dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Gas Alam Antara PT. P dengan PT. S, PT. K, Dan PT. B Purba, Maria Elisabet; Kanthika, I Made; Judge, Zulfikar; Widarto, Joko; Elawati, Tuti
Almufi Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 2 No 2: Juli 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Almubarak Fil Ilmi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63821/ash.v2i2.470

Klausul take-or-pay dalam perjanjian jual beli gas alam lazim digunakan sebagai mekanisme kepastian pendapatan bagi penjual. Namun, persoalan hukum timbul karena klausul tersebut mengharuskan pembeli membayar penuh atas volume gas yang disepakati, meskipun tidak seluruhnya diambil, sehingga menimbulkan potensi ketimpangan dalam pemenuhan hak dan kewajiban para pihak. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis penyelesaian permasalahan yang muncul akibat dari klausul take-or-pay dalam perjanjian jual beli gas alam yang dapat melindungi kepentingan penjual dan pembeli secara proporsional. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, serta mengacu pada teori perjanjian, teori keadilan, dan teori penyelesaian sengketa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa klausul take-or-pay ini berpotensi menimbulkan ketimpangan jika tidak disusun dengan memperhatikan proporsionalitas hak dan kewajiban para pihak. Kesimpulannya, keberadaan klausul take-or-pay hanya dapat dibenarkan secara hukum apabila disusun dengan mempertimbangkan asas keadilan dan proporsionalitas, serta memberikan ruang bagi penyelesaian sengketa yang melindungi kepentingan kedua belah pihak secara seimbang. Sarannya Pemerintah dan pelaku industri energi perlu mendorong penggunaan contractual risk-sharing mechanism yang adil dalam klausul ini, termasuk pengaturan tentang kompensasi yang wajar apabila terjadi kegagalan pengambilan gas yang bukan karena kelalaian pembeli.

Implications of Marriage Agreements on the Status of Couples' Property on Money Laundering Criminal Acts in Indonesia Kurniawan, Alan; Asri, Dyah Permata Budi; Markoni; Kanthika, I Made
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 7 No 3 (2025): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v7i3.1501

This study examines the implications of prenuptial agreements on the status of marital property in Money Laundering Crimes (TPPU). The research aims to analyze the legal status of assets separated through prenuptial agreements when one spouse is involved in money laundering, and to evaluate legal protection mechanisms for good-faith spouses. The study focuses on the conflict between the principle of party autonomy in marriage law and the principles of follow the money and asset recovery under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. The method used is normative juridical, employing statutory and theoretical approaches, including the theory of legal protection, the theory of evidence, and the concept of reverse burden of proof. Findings reveal that prenuptial agreements hold a strategic role as instruments of legal certainty under the principle of freedom of contract and the 1945 Constitution. However, in practice, within money laundering and corruption cases, their effectiveness is limited because the principles of follow the money and reverse burden of proof grant broad authority to law enforcement to seize assets even if formally legitimate. The normative conflict between civil and criminal law creates legal uncertainty disadvantaging third parties, while existing protections remain suboptimal due to high evidentiary standards and procedural barriers. Thus, regulatory harmonization is necessary to ensure legal certainty, prevent misuse of prenuptial agreements, and provide effective protection for good-faith spouses.

Legal Protection of Patients and Responsibilities of Artificial Intelligence-Based Telemedicine Health Services in Indonesia Alvina, Alvina; Markoni, Markoni; Kanthika, I Made; Asri, Dyah Permata Budi
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i9.52126

The advancement of digital technology in healthcare has fostered the emergence of telemedicine powered by artificial intelligence (AI), particularly within medical practice. In Indonesia, however, this rapid development has not been matched by clear legal safeguards for either patients or medical professionals. The central issues concern the extent of patient protection and the allocation of liability when errors occur in AI-assisted telemedicine services. This study employs a normative juridical approach, supported by statutory analysis, conceptual inquiry, and comparative legal study. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s health regulations remain general in nature and do not specifically define liability boundaries in AI-based medical practice. The absence of a lex specialis and ambiguity regarding legal subjects create potential injustice. This article recommends establishing regulations grounded in precautionary principles, incorporating algorithmic safety, independent audits, and a shared liability framework among physicians, platform providers, and developers to ensure accountability and patient protection in digital healthcare.

Analisis Yuridis Pembuktian Dalam Putusan Hakim Perkara pra Peradilan Studi Kasus Melina Setiaharta Versus Widiatmoko, Arry; Anabertha, Malemna Sura; Kanthika, I Made; Markoni, Markoni
Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Vol. 2 No. 5 (2024): Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal
Publisher : Al Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57185/mutiara.v2i5.184

Praperadilan memiliki arti penting dalam rangka penegakan hukum, melindungi pihak-pihak (tersangka, keluarga atau kuasanya) yang menjadi korban ketidaksewenang-wenangnya aparat penegak hukum baik dalam proses penyelidikan, penyidikan hingga penetapan sebagai tersangka. Putusan Praperadilan Nomor 13/Pid.Pra/2019/PN.JKT.PST permohonan Praperadilan dalam kasus ini termohon sebelumnya tidak menempati janjinya dan memerintahkan termohon untuk mencabut surat ketetapan tentang penghentian penyidikan atas laporan polisi. Dalam putusan ini permohonan pemohon dikabulkan untuk menindaklanjuti tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh termohon. Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif. Karena peneliti berusaha mengkaji perundang-undangan dan peraturan yang berlaku yang berkaitan dengan wewenang lembaga Praperadilan. Kemudian dihubungkan dengan permasalahan yang menjadi pokok pembahasan yang dibahas dalam penulisan skripsi ini sehingga dengan mengkaji undang-undang, peraturan yang berlaku, juga buku-buku yang berkonsep teoritis tersebut dapat menjawab dan menjelaskan permasalahan-permasalahan yang timbul dalam skripsi ini. Dari hasil penelitian diperoleh kseimpulan a. Proses Pembuktian dan dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Praperadilan Nomor 13/PID.PRAP/2019/PN.JKT.PST merupakan merupakan suatu proses yang terjadi saat persidangan yaitu untuk menyakinkan hakim tentang suatu kebenaran dalil atau dalil-dalil yang dikemukan dalam suatu persengketaan. b. Akibat hukum yang timbul dari Putusan Praperadilan dalam Mengabulkan/Gugatan Praperadilan Perkara Pidana dengan menyatakan batal dan tidak sah Penetapan tersangka terhadap laporan kejadian Tindak Pidana Sektor Jasa Keuangan Nomor: LKTP-SJK/7/IV/2019/DPJK, tertanggal 15 April 2019.

Title

Found 23 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 23 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 23 Documents
Search