Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

PENGENAAN PAJAK PENGHASILAN ATAS WARIS DAN HIBAH DALAM PENGALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN/ATAU BANGUNAN DI KOTA PADANG Oktario, Benny; Oktarina, Neneng
Alhurriyah Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Juli-Desember 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v4i2.1437

Abstract

Income Tax (PPh) is one of several types of tax, which is one of the primary sources of state revenue for development, which aims to improve the welfare and prosperity of the people. Income Tax (PPh) is regulated in Government Regulation number 34 of 2016. Where in each transfer of rights carried out by the taxpayer will be subject to Income Tax, but there is a transfer of rights excluded from the imposition and collection of Income Tax as stipulated in the Director-General of Taxes Regulation Number 30 / PJ / 2009, namely the removal of reasons due to inheritance and grants to blood families in a straight line. From this income tax collection, it is necessary to know some problems that arise. The issues, namely First, how is the imposition of Income Tax on inheritance and grants in the transfer of rights to land and buildings in the City of Padang. Second, is the Constraint in imposing income tax on estate and concessions in the removal of rights to land and buildings in the City of Padang. The research method used is an empirical juridical approach, and this research is descriptive-analytical as well as collecting data in the form of document studies and field research. Based on the results of the study, it was found that: The imposition of income tax on inheritance and grants in the transfer of rights to land and buildings in Padang city can be excluded from tax collection by submitting an income tax certificate for inheritance and donations between blood families in a straight line. Constraints in imposing Income Tax on estate and awards in the transfer of rights to land and or buildings in the city of Padang, are still taxpayers who have an NPWP but do not report their annual SPT and there are taxpayers who are not registered at the Tax Office and do not have NPWP, which causes the SKB application to be rejected or not granted.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DIREKSI YANG DIBERHENTIKAN TANPA MELALUI RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM (Studi Pada PT. Sumber Andalan Mandiri (SAM)) Lubis, Ikhsan; Oktarina, Neneng
UNES Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/law.v1i2.25

Abstract

One of the most incorporated legal entities as a business entity by business people today is a Limited Liability Company. In practice the mechanism for the appointment, replacement, and dismissal of the Board of Directors is not always adhered to properly by the Company's organs. In the case of PT. SAM with Phiedi as Director of PT. SAM has permanently and permanently dismissed one member of the Board of Directors from his position as a director without going through the GMS. Legal facts, the existence of e-mail dated April 22 and 24 2014 which essentially contained the dismissal of the Directors of PT. SAM is permanent or permanent. This paper discusses several problem formulations, namely: 1) What is the legal protection of directors who are dismissed without going through a general meeting of shareholders according to the positive legal framework in Indonesia? 2) What is the legal effort made by the directors who are dismissed without going through a general meeting of shareholders? This research is a descriptive research. The approach used in this study is a normative juridical approach supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used in this study are secondary data and primary data. Against all data and materials obtained from the results of the study will be compiled and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study explain that legal protection against directors who are replaced by directors who are dismissed without going through the GMS then: 1) Each member of the board of directors is personally responsible for the loss of the company; 2) Personal responsibility is attached to the member of the board of commissioners if he is guilty or negligent in carrying out the duties of supervision or giving advice; 3) Although the loss arises from the management of the board of directors, the members of the board of commissioners remain personally responsible if in the supervision of the implementation of the management of the board of directors there is an element of error or negligence of the board of commissioners; and 4) The extent of personal responsibility of the members of the board of commissioners, limited to their mistakes or negligence, and fifth, if the members of the board of commissioners consist of 2 (two) or more, personal responsibility, is jointly responsible for each member of the board of commissioners. Legal efforts made by directors who are dismissed without going through a general meeting of shareholders, then upon dismissal of the Board of Directors without the GMS, the Commissioner must immediately convene an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders to follow up on the temporary dismissal of the Board of Directors by the Board of Commissioners, then as soon as possible the Board of Commissioners calls the shareholders in the framework of the Extraordinary GMS to strengthen its decision. Considering that the Director is a majority shareholder, of course the ordinary GMS will not succeed because there is a quorum rule and the validation of the vote