Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia
M. Aris Munandar
Universitas Hasanuddin
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Persepsi mahasiswa sebagai pemilih pemula terhadap normalisasi politik uang dalam pemilihan umum Ahmad Fachri Faqi; Muh. Hasrul; Amaliyah Amaliyah; Ismail Iskandar; M. Aris Munandar
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 9 No 1 (2023): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v9i1.981

Abstract

The practice of money politics by some parties has been considered normal in elections in Indonesia. Money politics has been extensively discussed in the literature regarding voter behaviour in Indonesia from a political, sociological, psychological, and rational choice (political economy) perspective. Some studies focus on the influence of money politics in elections. Several international studies have also discussed academic explanations regarding the electoral impact of money politics. Beginner voters are a segment of voters who are considered more rational and not as pragmatic, with an increased awareness of the importance of holding elections with integrity. This study aims to determine students' perceptions as first-time voters of the normalization of money politics in elections. This research uses qualitative methods with a descriptive approach. The data used in this study is primary data in the form of structured interviews using questionnaires and secondary data. The research results show that most respondents know the prevalence and forms/types of money politics. Respondents have a perception that tends to be balanced regarding whether they agree or disagree that money politics is a common practice in elections in Indonesia. Factors that influence respondents' perceptions include elements in the respondent's self, factors on targets or objects, and situation/context factors.
Reforming Justice for Digital Sexual Violence in Southeast Asia: Indonesia’s Legal Protection Framework and Regional Lessons Maskun; Muhammad Mutawalli Mukhlis; M. Aris Munandar; Syamsuddin Muchtar; Nur Azisa; Audyna Mayasari Muin; Arnita Pratiwi Arifin; Budiyanto
International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ildisea.v5i1.42711

Abstract

Digital sexual violence is escalating in Southeast Asia as social media, chat services, and cloud storage enable non-consensual recording, dissemination of intimate images, sexual threats, and technology-facilitated harassment. This article assesses Indonesia’s legal protection framework and draws regional lessons for reform. Using normative legal research with international human rights law and comparative legal study as its primary approaches, this article examines Indonesia’s criminal law policies and selected judicial decisions concerning electronic-based sexual violence under the Sexual Violence Criminal Acts Law (SVCA Law, Law No. 12/2022) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (EIT Law, Law No. 19/2016). The analysis finds that Indonesia has advanced by criminalizing electronic-based sexual violence under the SVCA Law, yet sanctions remain focused on imprisonment and fines, leaving gaps for effective deterrence when offenders repeatedly exploit online communication tools. A recent revenge-porn case illustrates judicial experimentation with internet-access restrictions and the countervailing legality principle. Comparative insights from Canada and Germany show that court-supervised digital restrictions can be structured as additional penalties, while regional experiences in Malaysia, Thailand, and Japan underscore the value of conduct-specific offences and safeguards. The article proposes amending the SVCA Law, as lex specialis, to authorize proportionate revocation or limitation of online-communication access, supported by clear criteria, review mechanisms, and consistent inter-agency monitoring to balance constitutional freedoms and human rights.
Co-Authors Ahmad Fachri Faqi Amaliyah Amaliyah Arnita Pratiwi Arifin Audyna Mayasari Muin Budiyanto Hasrul, Muhammad Ismail Iskandar Maskun Muhammad Mutawalli Mukhlis Nur Azisa Syamsuddin Muchtar