Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

An Analysis On Pronunciation Errors Made By First Semester Students Of English Education Department STKIP CBN rafael, agnes maria diana
Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Bahasa Vol 12 No 1 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Bahasa
Publisher : Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Universitas Bina Darma

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33557/binabahasa.v12i1.254

Abstract

  Abstract :This study is conducted to find out the pronunciation errors made by the first semester students of English Education Department in STKIP CBN. In conducting the data, the researcher gave the pre-test to the informants, then; the researcher recorded the performances and transcribed the data. The secondary data was gathered from the interview. Based on the data analysis The researcher counted that there are nine types of errors pronunciation made by the subjects. The first error is the subjects substituted a vowel /?/ and six consonants /kj/,/t?/,/?/,/d?/ and /?/ with Indonesian sounds. The second error is the subjects substituted some English vowels into Indonesian vowel. The third error is word cognates cases. The fourth is language interference. The fifth is pronouncing the silent consonant /h/. The sixth error is Deleting or omitting some consonants that appeared at the end of some English words. The seventh error is the subjects pronounced the silent consonant /t/ in the word ?often?. The eighth error is the subjects added the consonant /r/ at the word, that word doesn?t required the consonant /r/. The last error is some subjects seemed to generalize the pronunciation of the past tense morpheme which is ended by a bound morpheme /ed/. This research is founded that there are three causes of students? pronunciation error made in speaking English. The first is an interference errors, the second is an intra lingual errors and the last is a developmental error.
DEFAMASI IRIANA WIDODO MELALUI MISOGINI DAN DEFEMISME PEREMPUAN (KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK) RAFAEL, AGNES MARIA DIANA; Pradhana, Ngurah Indra
HINEF : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): HINEF : JURNAL RUMPUN ILMU PENDIDIKAN (EDISI JANUARI 2024)
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Citra Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37792/hinef.v3i1.1192

Abstract

Abstract. The rise of defamation cases in Indonesia provides an entry point for forensic linguistic (one of linguistics branches) to solve all the legal cases related to language. For instance, the case of insult and defamation that was allegedly directed to Iriana Widodo through the choice of ironic dictions which referred to her physical appearance, her dressing style, and her communication style. This study aims to analyze in depth several texts that have been posted by several accounts on social media which are suspected in containing defamation isues against her. This study uses forensic linguistic analysis through a qualitative descriptive approach. The data in this research are some texts taken from social media accounts. Those texts went viral because they allegedly contained elements of defamation against her. To dissect each aspect as a means of discourse in each text, this study uses Halliday's social semiotic analysis. The results found that both texts contained insults containing physical insults (body shaming) and attacks on Iriana Widodo's honor as First Lady of the Indonesian Republic. The data in C.1 also contains attitude shaming which contains elements of misogyny towards women (in this case towards female prostitutes - specifically for data C.1). Meanwhile the data C.2 shows that the text used ironic figures of speech to indirectly insinuate Iriana Widodo's physical apperances and clothing style which is associated with household assistants (housemaids). The author of the text also used the dysphemism of prostitutes to attack Iriana Widodo (data C.2). Finally, data C.2 shows that the text maker attacks her by choosing ironic figures of speech. Abstrak. Kasus defamasi atau pencemaran nama baik di Indonesia memberikan jalan masuk kepada salah satu cabang ilmu linguistik mutahir yaitu linguistik forensik untuk memecahkan kasus-kasus hukum yang berkaitan dengan bahasa. Kajian ini membahasa dugaan penghinaan dan pencemaran nama baik yang diduga ditujukan kepada Iriana Widodo melalui pemilihan diksi-diksi ironi yang merujuk pada penampilan fisik  Iriana Widodo,  gaya berbusananya, dan gaya berkomunikasinya. Tujuan utama kajian untuk menganalisis secara mendalam beberapa teks-teks yang telah diposting oleh beberapa akun di media sosial yang diduga mengandung defamasi terhadap Iriana Widodo. Kajian ini menggunakan pisau analisis linguistik forensik melalui pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Data pada penelitian ini adalah teks-teks yang di ambil di akun media sosial yang viral karena diduga mengandung unsur pencemaran nama baik kepada Iriana Widodo. Untuk membedah setiap aspek-aspek sebagai sarana wacana pada masing-masing teks, kajian ini menggunakan analisis semiotika sosial Halliday. Hasil penelitian menemukan kedua teks tersebut mengandung penghinaan yang bermuatan penghinaan fisik (body shaming) dan penyerangan terhadap kehormatan Iriana Widodo sebagai Ibu Negara RI. Data pada C.1  mengandung penghinaan perilaku (attitude shaming) yang bermuatan  unsur misogini terhadap perempuan (dalam hal ini terhadap pelacur perempuan- khusus untuk data C.1). Selain itu untuk data C.2 si aktor pembuat teks menggunakan majas ironi untuk menyindir secara tidak langsung fisik dan gaya berbusana (outfit) Iriana Widodo yang diasosiasikan dengan asisten rumah tangga (bibi atau pembantu rumah tangga). Si  pembuat teks juga mengunakan diksi disfemisme pelacur untuk menyerang Iriana Widodo (data C.2). Sedangkan data C.2 menunjukan pembuat teks menyerang dengan pemilihan majas ironi.