Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

Persinggungan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan Tindak Pidana Pemilu dalam Konteks Pendanaan Kampanye Pemilu Sanjaya, Aditya Wiguna
AML/CFT Journal : The Journal Of Anti Money Laundering And Countering The Financing Of Terrorism Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Money Laundering in General Election, Digital Currency, and Terrorism Financing
Publisher : Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59593/amlcft.2023.v2i1.70

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the intersection between the PPTPPU Law and the Election Law in the context of election campaign funding, compare money laundering arrangements in the PPTPPU Law and the Election Law, and recommend ideal arrangements for handling money laundering in the context of future election campaign funding. The intersection between the PPTPPU Law and the Election Law regarding the provisions prohibiting receiving money from criminal acts has raised legal issues, namely which law should be applied, since both are special laws, furthermore this will also lead to different arrangements in each law. - the law, as well as PPATK not being involved in the handling of money laundering, which has been transformed into an election crime under the regime of the Election Law. The problem continues with the unregulated prohibition of giving election campaign fund contributions originating from criminal acts in the Election Law, and this shows the inconsistency of legislators in adopting the concept of money laundering into the Election Law. The method used is the normative legal research method. The results of the study show that based on the lex specialist systematic principle, the law that is applied is the Election Law. The Election Law does not stipulate active money laundering provisions, only regulates passive money laundering, while the PPTPPU Law regulates both; in the future, it is necessary to formulate active money laundering provisions in the Election Law.
CELAH INTERVENSI KEKUASAAN EKSEKUTIF TERHADAP KEKUASAAN YUDIKATIF DI LINGKUNGAN PERADILAN MILITER Sanjaya, Aditya Wiguna
Jurnal Panorama Hukum Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (549.231 KB) | DOI: 10.21067/jph.v3i2.2823

Abstract

Judicial power is one of the pillars supporting the establishment of a state, which ideally upholds the principle of independence so that it is independent and free from any influence of power, in the context of Indonesia the judicial power is carried out by a Supreme Court consisting of four judicial circles, namely general justice, religious court, the administrative court, military court and a Constitutional Court, in the course of the dynamics in the implementation of Judicial Power in Indonesia, which initially involved the organization, administration, and finance of the judicial body in relation to subordinate executive power, after the reform era had shifted under the Supreme Court, however, specifically for the military court there are still gaps in the potential for intervention from the executive power, which are caused by judges in the military court hierarchically there is still a command relationship with the TNI Commander and the President as the highest authority over the TNI. This will certainly have an influence on the independence of the military court as one of the executive branches of judicial power.
Persinggungan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan Tindak Pidana Pemilu dalam Konteks Pendanaan Kampanye Pemilu Sanjaya, Aditya Wiguna
AML/CFT Journal : The Journal Of Anti Money Laundering And Countering The Financing Of Terrorism Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Money Laundering in General Election, Digital Currency, and Terrorism Financing
Publisher : Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59593/amlcft.2023.v2i1.70

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the intersection between the PPTPPU Law and the Election Law in the context of election campaign funding, compare money laundering arrangements in the PPTPPU Law and the Election Law, and recommend ideal arrangements for handling money laundering in the context of future election campaign funding. The intersection between the PPTPPU Law and the Election Law regarding the provisions prohibiting receiving money from criminal acts has raised legal issues, namely which law should be applied, since both are special laws, furthermore this will also lead to different arrangements in each law. - the law, as well as PPATK not being involved in the handling of money laundering, which has been transformed into an election crime under the regime of the Election Law. The problem continues with the unregulated prohibition of giving election campaign fund contributions originating from criminal acts in the Election Law, and this shows the inconsistency of legislators in adopting the concept of money laundering into the Election Law. The method used is the normative legal research method. The results of the study show that based on the lex specialist systematic principle, the law that is applied is the Election Law. The Election Law does not stipulate active money laundering provisions, only regulates passive money laundering, while the PPTPPU Law regulates both; in the future, it is necessary to formulate active money laundering provisions in the Election Law.
Protecting the Religious Belief: A Study on the Blasphemy Laws Across Jurisdictions and Religions Ali, Mahrus; Al-Fahad, Hamad Faisal; Prabowo, M Shidqon; Wibawa, I Putu Sastra; Harefa, Beniharmoni; Sanjaya, Aditya Wiguna
Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Intersections of Religious Diversity, Legal Frameworks, and Human Rights
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ciils.v4i1.25521

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examines legal and religious dimensions of blasphemy in the provisions of Penal Code of Indonesia, Kuwaiti law correspond to the established principles of Islamic, Christianity, and Hinduism. This is through employing a critical and comparative approach, the study compares the foundational of Penal Code of Indonesia and the Kuwaiti legislation as well as Islamic Sharia, Christianity and Hinduism, identifying areas of overlap in criminalizing offenses against religious belief. The paper found that the Penal Code of Indonesia criminalizes incitement or coercion aimed at making others abandon their religion or belief through violence or threats, while Kuwaiti law largely reflects the Sharia based prohibition of conduct deemed offensive to sacred values. The underlying philosophies behind the criminalization of blasphemy in Islamic Sharia, Penal Code Kuwaiti law, may differ in their foundational justifications, they join on a shared notion, to protect religious thoughts and prevent the incitement of discord and hatred under freedom of expression. From the Christianity perspective, Christians are taught not only to forgive, pray for, and bless the offender, but also, if needed, to pursue legal avenues as provided by national laws. Hinduism places greater importance on maintaining fraternal relationships among humans being than on defending the honour of the religion or its deities. If an act is deemed blasphemous according to the law of the state, the recommended course of action in Hinduism is to restore spiritual balance through a ritual of atonement known as Prayascitta.
Penegakkan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Dunia Maya Sanjaya, Aditya Wiguna; Kristanto, Kiki
WELFARE STATE Jurnal Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56013/welfarestate.v4i2.4444

Abstract

This study aims to examine the government’s efforts in enforcing the law against cybercrime, while also analyzing the supporting and inhibiting factors that influence its implementation. The research method employed is normative legal research with both legislative and conceptual approaches, emphasizing the analysis of applicable legal norms and relevant theoretical frameworks. The findings indicate that the government, through law enforcement institutions such as the Indonesian National Police (Polri) and Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) under the Ministry of Communication and Informatics (Kemenkominfo), plays a crucial role in enforcing laws against cybercrime based on the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law). The primary supporting factor lies in the availability of adequate legal substance. However, challenges remain, including the limited number of trained personnel and the low level of public understanding regarding information technology. Therefore, effective law enforcement against cybercrime requires greater attention to enhancing the capacity of law enforcement resources, strengthening institutional support, and improving public digital literacy and awareness of information security.
PELATIHAN PERIZINAN BERUSAHA BAGI PEMILIK KOS SEKITAR KAMPUS UNESA 5 DALAM MENDUKUNG TATA KELOLA PROPERTI YANG LEGAL Akhmad Faisol, Syahid; Tinambunan, Hezron Sabar Rotua; Sanjaya, Aditya Wiguna; Setiawati, Anisa Deny; Kusuma, Febrian Indar Surya; Rahmat, Doris; Krishnandya, Kharizha
Jurnal Pengabdian Mitra Masyarakat Vol 5, No 1 (2025): Edisi September
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatear Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/jurpammas.v5i1.12285

Abstract

Kegiatan usaha penyewaan kamar kos di sekitar lingkungan kampus merupakan salah satu sektor ekonomi produktif yang berkembang pesat. Namun, masih banyak pemilik kos yang belum memahami pentingnya legalitas usaha melalui perizinan berusaha berbasis sistem Online Single Submission (OSS). Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kegiatan pelatihan perizinan berusaha bagi pemilik kos di sekitar Kampus Universitas Negeri Surabaya (UNESA) 5 sebagai upaya meningkatkan kesadaran hukum dan tata kelola properti yang legal. Metode pelaksanaan dilakukan melalui pendekatan pelatihan partisipatif, pendampingan administrasi OSS, serta evaluasi pemahaman peserta. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan pengetahuan dan kesadaran hukum pemilik kos terhadap pentingnya perizinan usaha. Pelatihan ini diharapkan menjadi model pemberdayaan masyarakat berbasis kampus dalam mewujudkan lingkungan usaha yang tertib, aman, dan legal.
Comparative Law Between Indonesia And Malaysia In The Resolution Of Cyberbullying Crimes Rahmawati, Afifah Nur; Sanjaya, Aditya Wiguna
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 34 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.34.2.123-136

Abstract

The development of information technology has given rise to various forms of cybercrime, one of which is cyberbullying, which is increasingly prevalent in society. The main problem of this research is how the legal regulations between Indonesia and Malaysia differ in resolving cyberbullying crimes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the similarities, differences, and effectiveness of the legal systems of both countries in providing legal protection to victims. The research method used is a normative-comparative approach by examining the laws and regulations in force in Indonesia, such as the Criminal Code and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), as well as laws in Malaysia through the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 and the Personal Data Protection Act. Supporting data is taken from reports of cyberbullying cases in Indonesia and Malaysia in 2024–2025. The results show that Indonesia has a broader legal scope with severe criminal penalties, but its weaknesses lie in the formulation of articles that are open to multiple interpretations and ineffective implementation. In contrast, Malaysia has more specific regulations with practical reporting mechanisms and strong personal data protection, although the criminal sanctions are relatively light. Thus, it can be concluded that Indonesia has a normative advantage, while Malaysia has a practical advantage in addressing cyberbullying.