Elika Maulidia
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Disparitas Pemidanaan dalam Tindak Pidana Penambangan Tanpa Izin: Analisis Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2021/PN Amp Ditinjau dari Tujuan Pemidanaan dan Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Farida Nurun Nazah; Delvi Eka Ariyanti; Elika Maulidia; Talitha Kamilah; Michel Priscila; Ismaya Rahailia Nasution
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 03 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 03, September 2026 Published
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i03.61178

Abstract

Illegal mining operations (PETI) cause permanent ecological destruction and substantial state financial losses. Using a comprehensive normative legal approach, this article carefully examines the lenient sentence in Judgment Number 44/Pid.B/2021/PN Amp regarding enforcement efficiency and returning heavy machinery to owners. The study reveals a sharp sentencing disparity; the offender received only two months' imprisonment. The judges' rigid legalistic-formal adherence completely overlooked tangible environmental damage. Returning the leased excavator weakens deterrence and inherently legitimizes illegal exploitation. Thus, environmental law supremacy remains suboptimal. Judges must adopt progressive legal steps through the polluter pays doctrine to ensure future ecological justice for the public
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pekerja Kontrak Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023: Antara Fleksibilitas dan Kepastian Hukum Elika Maulidia; Andhyka Muchtar
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i3.6676

Abstract

Law Number 6 of 2023 introduced significant changes to the regulation of Fixed-Term Employment Agreements (Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu/PKWT) by promoting labour market flexibility while maintaining legal protection for contract workers. Nevertheless, the new framework has generated debate regarding the balance between business flexibility and workers' rights. This study aims to examine the legal protection of contract workers following the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023, analyze the implementation of labour flexibility and legal certainty based on statutory regulations and judicial decisions, and evaluate whether the current framework achieves a fair balance between employers' and workers' interests. This normative legal research applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches by examining Law Number 6 of 2023, Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021, Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, and relevant legal literature. The findings indicate that the current regulations provide legal protection through restrictions on the use of fixed-term employment agreements, mandatory compensation, and recognition of workers' rights. However, practical implementation remains constrained by the misuse of PKWT, weak labour supervision, and inconsistent law enforcement. Strengthening labour inspection and legal enforcement is therefore essential to ensure an effective balance between labour flexibility and legal certainty.