Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Talitha Kamilah
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Perkembangan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (ADR) dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata Modern Talitha Kamilah; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/terang.v2i4.1460

Abstract

The evolution of modern civil procedural law demands dispute resolution mechanisms that are responsive, efficient, and substantively just. In this context, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) particularly mediation and arbitration has transformed from a supplementary option into a central instrument within Indonesia’s dispute resolution architecture. This study aims to analyze the development of ADR from the perspective of modern civil procedural law, focusing on the normative status and practical efficiency of mediation and arbitration as pre-litigation mechanisms. The research employs a normative-juridical approach, analyzing primary legal sources (legislation, Supreme Court Regulations [PERMA], court decisions) and secondary sources (scholarly journals, books, policy documents). The findings indicate that mediation has been mandatorily integrated into civil procedure through PERMA No. 1 of 2016, functioning as a court-facilitated pre-litigation stage, while arbitration operates as a consensual out-of-court mechanism under Law No. 30 of 1999. Both mechanisms demonstrate clear efficiency in terms of time (resolution within weeks to months), cost (minimal to predictable), and the ability to preserve parties’ relationships through collaborative processes and procedural confidentiality. Nevertheless, implementation challenges remain, particularly concerning the availability of qualified mediators and public perception of ADR. The study concludes that ADR is no longer a marginal alternative but an integral pillar of modern civil justice, aligning with principles of procedural efficiency and substantive justice.
Disparitas Pemidanaan dalam Tindak Pidana Penambangan Tanpa Izin: Analisis Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.B/2021/PN Amp Ditinjau dari Tujuan Pemidanaan dan Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Farida Nurun Nazah; Delvi Eka Ariyanti; Elika Maulidia; Talitha Kamilah; Michel Priscila; Ismaya Rahailia Nasution
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 03 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 03, September 2026 Published
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i03.61178

Abstract

Illegal mining operations (PETI) cause permanent ecological destruction and substantial state financial losses. Using a comprehensive normative legal approach, this article carefully examines the lenient sentence in Judgment Number 44/Pid.B/2021/PN Amp regarding enforcement efficiency and returning heavy machinery to owners. The study reveals a sharp sentencing disparity; the offender received only two months' imprisonment. The judges' rigid legalistic-formal adherence completely overlooked tangible environmental damage. Returning the leased excavator weakens deterrence and inherently legitimizes illegal exploitation. Thus, environmental law supremacy remains suboptimal. Judges must adopt progressive legal steps through the polluter pays doctrine to ensure future ecological justice for the public
AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN PEMBUBARAN PARTAI POLITIK DAN EKSKLUSIVITAS HAK PEMOHON OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 53/PUU-IX/2011 Pardamean Harahap; Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra; Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama; Ahmad Jafar Sidik; Galuh Candra Utami; Talitha Kamilah; Claraditha Adelia Nelson; Zahra Ramadhanty Drajat; Asyifa Nayla Jingga
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 03 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 03, September 2026 Publish
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i03.65151

Abstract

The dissolution of political parties is one of the Constitutional Court’s authorities to safeguard democracy, state ideology, and the integrity of the Republic of Indonesia. Constitutional Court Decision Number 53/PUU-IX/2011 affirms that the Government is the only party with legal standing to petition for the dissolution of a political party. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of such exclusivity and the legal consequences arising from a dissolution decision. This research employs a normative legal method through statutory, case, and literature approaches. The results show that limiting legal standing is intended to maintain national stability, but it also restricts citizens’ participation in monitoring political parties. Furthermore, the dissolution of a political party results in the revocation of its legal entity status, termination of its activities, state acquisition of its assets, and restrictions on certain political rights of its officials. Therefore, strengthening legal mechanisms is necessary to ensure legal certainty and uphold constitutional democracy.
Co-Authors Ahmad Jafar Sidik Asyifa Nayla Jingga Claraditha Adelia Nelson Delvi Eka Ariyanti Elika Maulidia Galuh Candra Utami Ismaya Rahailia Nasution Michel Priscila Mochamad Yulian Fadhli Saputra Muhamad Noval Faris Pratama Nazah, Farida Nurun Pardamean Harahap Wiraguna, Sidi Ahyar Zahra Ramadhanty Drajat