Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kedudukan Hakim dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Perdata: Tinjauan Kepustakaan atas Doktrin dan Yurisprudensi Ismaya Rahailia Nasution; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v2i4.2597

Abstract

The position of judges in the process of proving civil cases occupies a fundamental role in upholding justice and legal certainty within the Indonesian judicial system. This study aims to examine the judge’s position, duties, and authority in the evidentiary process of civil cases through a literature review focusing on doctrines and jurisprudence. Using a normative juridical method with a library research approach, this paper analyzes legal theories, statutory provisions, and judicial precedents that regulate evidentiary procedures in civil law. The findings show that a judge is not merely a passive law enforcer but an active truth-seeker who must interpret and assess evidence based on principles of fairness, propriety, and moral values. The judge’s discretion in evaluating evidence reflects the responsibility to harmonize formal legal norms with the pursuit of substantive justice. Jurisprudence demonstrates that judges play an essential role in shaping evidentiary standards and ensuring that court decisions reflect the ideals of justice and legal certainty. The study concludes that the authority and independence of judges are crucial in realizing a fair trial, as they ensure that decisions are based on verified facts, logical reasoning, and moral responsibility. Strengthening the professionalism and integrity of judges is necessary to guarantee that the evidentiary process in civil proceedings fulfills the principles of equality before the law and promotes justice in society.
Analisis Putusan 457/Pdt.G/2020/PTA.Sby: Perlindungan Hak Waris Berdasar KUHPerdata dan KHI Intan Nazili; Delvi Eka Ariyanti; Galuh Candra Utami; Zahra Ramadhanty Drajat; Kamilah, Talitha; Astri Anggraeni Putri; Ismaya Rahailia Nasution
Journal Sovereignty Law And Diplomatic Politics Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Journal Sovereignty Law and Diplomatic Politics
Publisher : CV Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jlsdp.v2i1.1983

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan majelis hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 457/Pdt.G/2020/PTA.Sby terkait keabsahan hibah yang ditinjau dari Pasal 1321 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata) dan Pasal 210 ayat (1) Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa majelis hakim cenderung menerapkan pendekatan yuridis-formalistis dengan menitikberatkan pada kekuatan pembuktian akta otentik dan tanda tangan persetujuan ahli waris sebagai bukti tidak adanya cacat kehendak. Dalam penerapan Pasal 210 ayat (1) KHI, hakim menilai batas maksimal hibah berdasarkan aspek kuantitatif luas objek hibah tanpa melakukan penilaian komprehensif terhadap nilai ekonomis keseluruhan harta pemberi hibah. Pendekatan tersebut berpotensi mengabaikan tujuan normatif Pasal 210 ayat (1) KHI sebagai norma pembatas yang berfungsi melindungi hak ahli waris. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian dan keadilan substantif dalam menilai keabsahan hibah.