Mila Adhisty
Universitas Negeri Malang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Mengukur elemen pendidikan: Validasi konstruk praktik mengajar dan lingkungan belajar berbasis EFA Mila Adhisty; Yogi Dwi Satrio
Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JUPE) Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jupe.v14n3.p413-422

Abstract

The effectiveness of the learning process is determined not only by teachers' pedagogical and technological competence, but also by the quality of the learning environment. Therefore, a measurement instrument with established validity and reliability is required. This study aims to examine the construct validity and reliability of the TPACK and WIHIC instruments as representations of teaching practice and learning environment among 100 economics education students in East Java. Data were analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with Varimax rotation. Results show that all sub-constructs demonstrated adequate sampling adequacy and reliability, with a single factor extracted for each construct. Two WIHIC items were removed due to loadings below the cutoff. The instruments are proven valid and reliable for measuring educational elements among economics education students.
Moolang Virtual Class Platform: Economic Learning Outcomes and Implication for Entrepreneurship Education Yogi Dwi Satrio; Ana Dhoud Daroin; Bagus Shandy Narmaditya; Vika Annisa Qurrata; Sheerad Sahid; Mila Adhisty
JURNAL EKONOMI PENDIDIKAN DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jepk.v14n2.p325-346

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Moolang virtual learning platform in improving economic learning outcomes and examines its relevance to economic and entrepreneurship education amid Indonesia's shifting digital learning habits. Method: A four-phase quasi-experimental design compared an experimental class (n = 30, Universitas Negeri Malang) using Moolang with a control class (n = 30, State University of Surabaya) receiving conventional instruction, under balanced internet connectivity conditions (50% strong, 50% weak, self-reported). Learning outcomes on demand-supply economic concepts were assessed at the end of each phase and analyzed using a mixed-design (split-plot) ANOVA with Group (experimental vs. control) as the between-subjects factor and Phase (1-4) as the within-subjects factor. Results: The experimental class significantly outperformed the control class in Phase 2 (p = .038, d = 0.55), Phase 3 (p < .001, d = 1.85)  and Phase 4 (p = .007, d = 0.73), with no difference at Phase 1 baseline (p = .568, d = 0.15). The mixed ANOVA showed a significant Group main effect, F(1,58) = 34.37, p < .001 and a significant Group × Phase interaction, F(3,174) = 5.52, p = .001 (Greenhouse-Geisser corrected p = .003 following a significant Mauchly's test), while the Phase main effect alone was not significant, F(3,174) = 1.29, p = .278. Novelty: Unlike prior evaluations that treat virtual classrooms as a generic phenomenon and analyze repeated-measures data with independent-samples ANOVA, this study applies a mixed-design ANOVA appropriate to the repeated-phase structure of the data and situates platform effectiveness within economics-specific case content (price-mechanism reasoning and implicit opportunity-cost trade-offs) rather than treating entrepreneurship relevance as an unexamined extension.