Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Sultan Adam : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Ridho Alamsyah Lonthor
UIN Abdul Muthalib Sangadji Ambon
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi Kewenangan Penuntut Umum dalam Mekanisme Plea Bargaining Sebagai Implementasi Prinsip Dominus Litis Ahmad Lonthor; Ridho Alamsyah Lonthor; Syah Awaluddin
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i2.6680

Abstract

The development of modern criminal justice systems has encouraged a shift in criminal case resolution through a negotiated justice approach. The introduction of the Guilty Plea mechanism (plea bargaining) under Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code expands the authority of public prosecutors in determining the direction of criminal case resolution. This development raises concerns regarding the limits of prosecutorial authority within the framework of the dominus litis principle, particularly concerning prosecutorial discretion and accountability mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the construction of prosecutorial authority in the implementation of plea bargaining and to formulate an appropriate model based on the dominus litis principle. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that the New Criminal Procedure Code has expanded the meaning of dominus litis from controlling prosecution to determining criminal case resolution strategies. However, such expansion requires limitations through clear standards, legal accountability, and adequate oversight mechanisms. This study proposes the concept of Accountable Limited Dominus Litis as a model that maintains the prosecutor’s role as the controller of criminal proceedings while ensuring accountability, proportionality, and protection of defendants’ rights.
PARAMETER KUALITATIF ALAT BUKTI PENETAPAN TERSANGKA DALAM SISTEM KUHAP NASIONAL Ahmad Lonthor; Ridho Alamsyah Lonthor
SULTAN ADAM: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Juli-Desember 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Tanggui Baimbaian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71456/sultan.v4i2.2620

Abstract

Perubahan kedudukan barang bukti dalam sistem pembuktian KUHAP Nasional menghadirkan persoalan mengenai standar kecukupan alat bukti sebagai dasar penetapan tersangka. Penempatan barang bukti sebagai bagian dari alat bukti yang sah memperluas dasar pembuktian yang dapat digunakan dalam memenuhi persyaratan minimal dua alat bukti, sekaligus menimbulkan pertanyaan apakah kecukupan tersebut dapat dinilai hanya berdasarkan jumlah atau juga memerlukan penilaian terhadap kualitas pembuktiannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pemaknaan kecukupan alat bukti dalam penetapan tersangka, merumuskan parameter kualitatifnya, serta menentukan batas pengujiannya dalam praperadilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemenuhan bewijsminimum sebagai ambang kuantitatif belum dengan sendirinya menunjukkan bewijskracht atau daya pembuktian yang memadai. Kecukupan alat bukti karena itu perlu dinilai melalui empat parameter yang saling berkaitan, yaitu legalitas, relevansi, reliabilitas, dan koroborasi. Penerapan parameter tersebut dilakukan melalui pengujian kualitatif terbatas yang diarahkan pada kelayakan dasar sangkaan tanpa memasuki penilaian final terhadap substansi perkara atau kesalahan tersangka. Dengan demikian, kecukupan minimal dua alat bukti dalam sistem KUHAP Nasional perlu dipahami sebagai keterpaduan antara ambang kuantitatif dan kecukupan kualitatif, dengan kedalaman pengujian yang tetap dibatasi oleh fungsi prosesual penetapan tersangka.
Standar Penilaian Hakim terhadap Bukti Forensik dalam Penemuan Kebenaran Materiil Perkara Pidana Ridho Alamsyah Lonthor
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): Oktober : Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v3i5.1931

Abstract

Forensic evidence assists judges in explaining facts that require scientific examination and interpretation, but its scientific character does not automatically guarantee the accuracy of the findings or their probative value. This study analyzes the legal status and problems associated with judicial assessment of forensic evidence and formulates assessment standards that support the establishment of material truth in criminal cases. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively and prescriptively. The study finds that forensic evidence is not an independent category of legal evidence but is presented through forms of evidence recognized under Law Number 20 of 2025. Legal admissibility alone does not establish scientific reliability or sufficient probative value. Judicial assessment is also constrained by limited scientific understanding, dependence on experts and forensic institutions, the integrity of evidence, and divergent interpretations of examination results. This study proposes three sequential and interconnected standards: a legal standard for assessing admissibility, a scientific standard for evaluating the reliability of methods and their application, and an evidentiary standard for determining relevance and probative value. The integrated application of these standards can strengthen judicial reasoning and produce decisions that are rational, transparent, and accountable in establishing material truth.
Co-Authors Awaluddin, Syah Lonthor, Ahmad