Rohmad Adi Yulianto
Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

Kebijakan Penanganan Pengungsi di Indonesia Perspektif Maqāṣid Al-Syarī’ah Yulianto, Rohmad Adi
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol 13 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (805.543 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v13i2.2460

Abstract

The problematic of humanism in many countries resulted in a phenomenon of transnational refugee migration. Indonesia is one of a country which has received a massif influx of refugee waves aimed to obtain asylum. This study discussed the policy of handling refugees in Indonesia from the maqasid sharia as perspective. Maqasid sharia, as one of the Islamic law methodological approaches, helped of understanding social phenomena which positioned the interest (maslaha) as the core treatise. This study aimed to explain that the interaction between maqasid sharia as perspective and the development of national regulation, included the regulation in handling refugees, resulted in three models of policy (instructive, integrative, and adaptive). The instructive policy implemented through taqnin model, which is issued by the state authority as a positive norm. An integrative policy implemented through the eclectic model adopted the finest part from both national law and Islamic law. The adaptive policy implemented when important elements of Islamic law affirmed national policy which contained fundamental principles of universal humanism as part of sharia.
Tinjauan Yuridis Pencabutan Hak Kewarganegaraan Mantan Anggota Organisasi Militan Ekstremis (ISIS) Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Aturan Kewarganegaraan Abdullah Raden Aji Haqqi; Rohmad Adi Yulianto; Damrah Mamang
VERITAS Vol 7 No 2 (2021): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v7i2.1641

Abstract

Citizenship is a legal bond between a person and a country. Citizenship gives people an identity. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms that "everyone has the right to a nationality", thus this declaration recognizes the importance of citizenship legally and practically for the fulfillment of human rights. Therefore, governments must work to ensure that everyone has a nationality. Former members of extremist militant organizations themselves can be interpreted as military groups (Army, Navy and Air Force), and militias and volunteer corps that meet these four requirements, are called “Former members”. They are justified in actively participating in hostilities. Also included in the ex-member group are: residents of an area that has not been occupied by the enemy, who spontaneously took up arms when organizing themselves, and carried weapons openly. Extremism is not really new. There has been a lot of extremist behavior that is usually associated with terrorist behavior and attacks against a group, both in Indonesia and abroad. Extremist behavior is slightly different from criminal behavior in general. The crimes committed by extremists are crimes based on the path they have chosen regarding their way of seeing the world. Law number 12 of 2006 concerning citizenship, it is stated in article 23 that Indonesian citizens will lose their citizenship in several ways, starting from the person concerned obtaining another citizenship, entering the service of a foreign army, entering the service of a foreign country, swearing allegiance to a foreign country. , participating in the elections of foreign countries, and several other matters mentioned in Chapter IV of the law. So even though it is true that ISIS itself is not a country as described in the writing of this thesis, this cannot be used as a basis for guiding that an Indonesian citizen who is a member of ISIS cannot lose his citizenship because it is clearly regulated in both laws and regulations. The government is what causes the Indonesian citizen to lose his citizenship automatically, not because of certain individuals who can decide whether or not a person's citizenship is lost or not.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF DIVORCE DUE TO EARLY MARRIAGE Aryanti, Aryanti; Lubis, Efridani; Yulianto, Rohmad Adi
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol 5 No 1 (2023): PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AND PROHIBITION OF DRAG USE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v5i1.110

Abstract

The study of Juridical Analysis of Divorce Due to Early Marriage aims to determine the regulation of early marriage in positive law in Indonesia and to determine dispute resolution (divorce) due to early marriage. This study uses a normative juridical approach. The research method used in this research is descriptive analytical method, which is a research method by processing data, analyzing, researching and interpreting as well as making conclusions and providing suggestions which are then arranged in a systematic discussion so that the problem can be understood. The type of research used is normative law research. The results show that families experiencing economic difficulties will tend to marry off their children at a young age, this marriage is expected to be a solution to the economic difficulties experienced by families, marriage is expected to reduce the family's economic burden. Another influence is due to the low level of education that encourages them to get married quickly. Because they do not understand how marriage really is, the occurrence of pregnancy out of wedlock, because children have relationships that violate the norms forcing them to have early marriages in order to clarify the children conceived by this marriage force them to marry. There are still many women in Indonesia who marry underage for various reasons such as customs, economy, and other things that are not desirable. In fact, according to Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, it is stated that marriage is only permitted if the man and woman are 19 years old.
Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Kebebasan Beragama Pada Anak Yang Dilahirkan Dari Perkawinan Orang Tua Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Anak Utami, Febriani Tri; Yulianto, Rohmad Adi; Intihani, Siti Nur
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Problematika Hukum Bisnis Pada Era Digital
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v6i1.167

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas kompleksitas identitas agama anak-anak hasil perkawinan beda agama. Meskipun belum ada aturan khusus, Undang-Undang Dasar dan Perlindungan Anak memberikan dasar hukum bagi kebebasan beragama anak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ketiadaan regulasi khusus, meski anak-anak perkawinan beda agama dianggap mendapatkan perlindungan hukum yang memadai. Mereka diberi kebebasan memilih agama setelah mencapai usia tertentu, dengan peran orang tua, terutama ibu dan bapak, memengaruhi pilihan agama anak. Kesimpulannya, meskipun kompleks, perlindungan hukum bagi kebebasan beragama anak perkawinan beda agama dianggap berjalan baik.
Integrasi Prinsip Non-Refoulement dengan Prinsip Jus Cogens pada Kebijakan Penanganan Pengungsi di Indonesia Yulianto, Rohmad Adi
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 14, No 3 (2020): November Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2020.V14.493-516

Abstract

Problematika kemanusiaan yang jamak terjadi di berbagai negara memunculkan fenomena migrasi manusia lintas negara. Indonesia menjadi salah satu negara yang menjadi tujuan singgah migrasi pengungsi sebelum mereka diberikan suaka oleh negara-negara pemberi suaka. Migrasi pengungsi lintas negara mempengaruhi terbentuknya regulasi supra nasional tentang perlindungan, status, dan hak-hak para pengungsi pencari suaka, baik di negara penerima maupun negara singgah. Penelitian ini menganalisis hubungan antara prinsip non-refoulement dengan norma kepastian yang terkandung di dalam prinsip jus cogens pada sumber hukum internasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis filosofis dengan memaparkan hubungan antara tiga aliran dalam hukum internasional: naturalis, positivis, dan kosmopolis. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kebijakan penanganan pengungsi di Indonesia tidak melandaskan kepatuhan negara atas prinsip non-refoulement terhadap konvensi tahun 1951 tentang pengungsi, melainkan berdasarkan kepada kovenan dan konvensi internasional tentang Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hak Sipil yang telah diratifikasi Pemerintah Indonesia melalui Undang-undang RI Nomor 5 tahun 1998, Undang-undang RI Nomor 39 tahun 1999, dan Undang-undang RI Nomor 12 tahun 2005. Penelitian ini juga menyimpulkan bahwa ketiga aliran filsafat rezim hukum internasional; Naturalis, Positivis, dan Kosmopolis, memiliki kesamaan dalam memetakan dasar kepatuhan negara terhadap aturan-aturan supranasional, yaitu terdapatnya sikap negara secara sukarela untuk mengikatkan diri ke dalam kesepakatan dengan negara lain.
The Principle of Proportionality in Armed Conflict under International Law and Islam Yulianto, Rohmad Adi; Mufid, Abdul
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 25, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v25i1.42273

Abstract

Proportionality plays a critical role in limiting the harms caused by armed conflict, particularly those affecting civilians and public infrastructure. However, the implementation of this principle can be challenging due to the uncertainties in customary international law status. This leads to differences in legal interpretation and the lack of transparency in military decision-making. This study investigates the principle of proportionality in armed conflict, focusing on its interpretation and application in international law and Islamic jurisprudence. The research examines the similarities and differences between Islamic jurisprudence and international humanitarian law on targeting, use of force, and treatment of non-combatants and detainees. The paper uses normative legal research methodology to explore the legal foundations and practical implications of proportionality in armed conflict, comparing legal frameworks like the Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocols, the Rome Statute, and Islamic legal literature. The study reveals commonalities and differences between International Humanitarian Law and Islamic law. The findings highlight the crucial role in reducing the impact of armed conflicts on civilians and infrastructure. The study advocates for ongoing dialogue and cooperation to improve global adherence to proportionality in armed conflicts.AbstrakPrinsip proporsionalitas berperan penting dalam membatasi dampak yang ditimbulkan oleh konflik bersenjata, khususnya terhadap warga sipil dan infrastruktur publik. Namun, penerapan prinsip ini menghadapi berbagai tantangan akibat ketidakpastian statusnya dalam hukum kebiasaan internasional. Hal ini menyebabkan perbedaan dalam interpretasi hukum serta kurangnya transparansi dalam pengambilan keputusan militer. Penelitian ini mengkaji prinsip proporsionalitas dalam konflik bersenjata, dengan fokus pada interpretasi dan penerapannya dalam hukum internasional dan yurisprudensi Islam. Selanjutnya, studi ini menganalisis persamaan dan perbedaan antara yurisprudensi Islam dan hukum humaniter internasional dalam hal penargetan, penggunaan kekuatan, serta perlakuan terhadap non-kombatan dan tahanan. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, studi ini mengeksplorasi landasan hukum serta implikasi praktis dari prinsip proporsionalitas dalam konflik bersenjata, melalui perbandingan berbagai kerangka hukum seperti Konvensi Jenewa, Protokol Tambahan, Statuta Roma, dan literatur hukum Islam. Penelitian menunjukkan adanya titik temu dan perbedaan antara Hukum Humaniter Internasional dan hukum Islam. Temuan ini menekankan pentingnya prinsip proporsionalitas dalam mengurangi dampak konflik bersenjata terhadap warga sipil dan infrastruktur. Studi ini mendorong adanya dialog dan kerja sama berkelanjutan untuk meningkatkan kepatuhan global terhadap prinsip proporsionalitas dalam konflik bersenjata.  
The Principle of Proportionality in Armed Conflict under International Law and Islam Yulianto, Rohmad Adi; Mufid, Abdul
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol. 25 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v25i1.42273

Abstract

Proportionality plays a critical role in limiting the harms caused by armed conflict, particularly those affecting civilians and public infrastructure. However, the implementation of this principle can be challenging due to the uncertainties in customary international law status. This leads to differences in legal interpretation and the lack of transparency in military decision-making. This study investigates the principle of proportionality in armed conflict, focusing on its interpretation and application in international law and Islamic jurisprudence. The research examines the similarities and differences between Islamic jurisprudence and international humanitarian law on targeting, use of force, and treatment of non-combatants and detainees. The paper uses normative legal research methodology to explore the legal foundations and practical implications of proportionality in armed conflict, comparing legal frameworks like the Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocols, the Rome Statute, and Islamic legal literature. The study reveals commonalities and differences between International Humanitarian Law and Islamic law. The findings highlight the crucial role in reducing the impact of armed conflicts on civilians and infrastructure. The study advocates for ongoing dialogue and cooperation to improve global adherence to proportionality in armed conflicts. Abstrak Prinsip proporsionalitas berperan penting dalam membatasi dampak yang ditimbulkan oleh konflik bersenjata, khususnya terhadap warga sipil dan infrastruktur publik. Namun, penerapan prinsip ini menghadapi berbagai tantangan akibat ketidakpastian statusnya dalam hukum kebiasaan internasional. Hal ini menyebabkan perbedaan dalam interpretasi hukum serta kurangnya transparansi dalam pengambilan keputusan militer. Penelitian ini mengkaji prinsip proporsionalitas dalam konflik bersenjata, dengan fokus pada interpretasi dan penerapannya dalam hukum internasional dan yurisprudensi Islam. Selanjutnya, studi ini menganalisis persamaan dan perbedaan antara yurisprudensi Islam dan hukum humaniter internasional dalam hal penargetan, penggunaan kekuatan, serta perlakuan terhadap non-kombatan dan tahanan. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, studi ini mengeksplorasi landasan hukum serta implikasi praktis dari prinsip proporsionalitas dalam konflik bersenjata, melalui perbandingan berbagai kerangka hukum seperti Konvensi Jenewa, Protokol Tambahan, Statuta Roma, dan literatur hukum Islam. Penelitian menunjukkan adanya titik temu dan perbedaan antara Hukum Humaniter Internasional dan hukum Islam. Temuan ini menekankan pentingnya prinsip proporsionalitas dalam mengurangi dampak konflik bersenjata terhadap warga sipil dan infrastruktur. Studi ini mendorong adanya dialog dan kerja sama berkelanjutan untuk meningkatkan kepatuhan global terhadap prinsip proporsionalitas dalam konflik bersenjata.