Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, Dan Sosial Humaniora
Martinus Payong Bedaloli Hayon
Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Ekstraktivisme dan Kebebasan Masyarakat: Perspektif Development as Freedom Amartya Sen Alexandro Megano; Franjelin Fierer Woda Lukas; Ikordinus Poweng Wasini; Yohanes Aurelius Gradisca; Sales Agung; Salvinus Serafim; Antonius Sunarno Sam; Martinus Payong Bedaloli Hayon; Dionisius Ian Omenu; Benediktus Ratu Tukan
Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April : JURNAL ILMIAH DAN KARYA MAHASISWA (JIKMA)
Publisher : Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis (ITB) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54066/jikma.v4i2.5001

Abstract

This study analyzes extractivism in Indonesia through Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom perspective. Extractivism, particularly mining and natural resource exploitation, generates economic benefits but also creates social-ecological injustice, limited public participation, and reduced community access to resources and living spaces. This study employs a qualitative method using a literature review approach. Data were obtained from books, scientific articles, reports, and relevant documents concerning extractivism, development, public participation, and Amartya Sen’s thought. The findings indicate that development should not be measured solely by economic growth, investment, or state revenue, but also by the extent to which it expands substantive freedoms and people’s capabilities. In the context of extractivism, limitations on political freedom, transparency, social opportunities, economic facilities, and protective security may increase capability deprivation among affected communities. Therefore, extractive-sector development needs to position communities as active agents of development by strengthening participation, transparency, indigenous peoples’ protection, and ecological sustainability. This perspective shifts the understanding of development from merely exploiting natural resources toward expanding people’s capabilities to live a dignified and meaningful life.
Analisis Korupsi di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan John Rawls Charlos Mario Y. B. Makung; Maria Claudia Lodan; Fransiskus Richardo Sukun; Yohanes Aurelius Gradisca; Heribertus Torino Kato; Sales Agung; Dionisius Ian Omenu; Teofano Jenatun; Patrisius Hasa Kego; Martinus Payong Bedaloli Hayon
Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari: Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/atmosfer.v4i1.2038

Abstract

Corruption is a serious problem in Indonesia that not only causes state financial losses but also undermines justice, equality, public trust, and the distribution of social benefits. This study aims to analyze corruption in Indonesia as a form of institutional injustice from the perspective of John Rawls's theory of justice. The study employs a qualitative method using a literature review approach. Data were obtained through an examination of books, journal articles, and scholarly sources relevant to corruption and Rawls's theory of justice. The findings indicate that corruption contradicts the principle of justice as fairness because it creates inequalities in access to power, public positions, public services, and resource distribution. Corruption also violates the principles of equal basic liberties, fair equality of opportunity, and the difference principle because corrupt benefits are obtained through unfair mechanisms and ultimately impose social costs on society, particularly disadvantaged groups. Therefore, combating corruption should focus not only on law enforcement but also on institutional reform and strengthening social justice.
Co-Authors Alexandro Megano Antonius Sunarno Sam Benediktus Ratu Tukan Charlos Mario Y. B. Makung Dionisius Ian Omenu Franjelin Fierer Woda Lukas Fransiskus Richardo Sukun Heribertus Torino Kato Ikordinus Poweng Wasini Maria Claudia Lodan Patrisius Hasa Kego Sales Agung Salvinus Serafim Teofano Jenatun Yohanes Aurelius Gradisca