Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kohabitasi (Kumpul Kebo) dalam Perspektif Relasi Aku-Engkau Martin Buber: Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Dialog Maria Claudia Lodan; Felix Riondi Sugar; Yulius Argenio Eko; Heribertus Harsoyo; Fransisco G. N. Nggajo; Champideli A. Jalni; Alfeus Alfian Nenat; Simon Oktafianus Nailiu; Antonius Sunarno Sam; Alfonsius Lulus Nifu
Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas 45 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30640/dewantara.v5i1.7694

Abstract

The phenomenon of cohabitation or living together without a legally recognized marriage has become one of the social issues developing in modern society. Changes in values, cultural development, economic factors, and shifting understandings of commitment and marriage have contributed to the increasing practice of cohabitation. In the Indonesian context, this phenomenon generates debate because it encounters legal, religious, and cultural norms that consider marriage as an important institution in human life. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of cohabitation through Martin Buber’s dialogical philosophy, particularly the concepts of the I-It and I-Thou relations. This research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach by analyzing Martin Buber’s works and various literature related to cohabitation, marriage, and human relations. The findings indicate that cohabitation cannot merely be understood as a legal or moral issue but also as a philosophical issue concerning the quality of human relationships. From Buber’s perspective, relationships oriented only toward personal needs, comfort, or specific interests tend to become I-It relations because the other person is reduced to an object. Conversely, the I-Thou relation emphasizes respect for personal dignity, openness, responsibility, and authentic encounters between individuals. Therefore, Martin Buber’s thought provides a critical reflection that human relationships should be built upon dialogue, responsibility, and respect for others as complete and valuable persons.
Pembangunan Pariwisata Super Prioritas Labuan Bajo dalam Perspektif Development as Freedom Amartya Sen Felix Riondi Sugar; Arnoldus Roy Alfander; Fridolin De’e; Epi Pianus Gregorius Gadja Wora; Simplisius Seke Kawa; Kristoforus Mage; Champideli Armanoba Jalni; Adrianus Ovin; Flavianus Joerdy Pati Klore; Antonius Sunarno Sam
Populer: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa
Publisher : Universitas Maritim AMNI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58192/populer.v5i1.4814

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the development of super-priority tourism in Labuan Bajo using Amartya Sen’s “development as freedom” perspective. This study is motivated by the paradox of tourism development, which, on the one hand, drives economic growth but, on the other hand, gives rise to various social and cultural issues as well as inequalities for local communities. The research method employed is a qualitative approach using a descriptive-analytical design through a literature review. Data were obtained from books, scientific journals, government documents, and various other relevant sources related to tourism development and Amartya Sen’s development theory. The results of the study indicate that tourism development in Labuan Bajo has not yet fully expanded the substantive freedoms of local communities. Investor dominance, inequalities in land ownership, low-quality human resources, and minimal community participation constitute forms of “unfreedoms” that the community continues to experience. Therefore, tourism development needs to be directed toward a development model that is inclusive, participatory, and socially just so that the well-being of local communities can be realized more equitably.
Ekstraktivisme dan Kebebasan Masyarakat: Perspektif Development as Freedom Amartya Sen Alexandro Megano; Franjelin Fierer Woda Lukas; Ikordinus Poweng Wasini; Yohanes Aurelius Gradisca; Sales Agung; Salvinus Serafim; Antonius Sunarno Sam; Martinus Payong Bedaloli Hayon; Dionisius Ian Omenu; Benediktus Ratu Tukan
Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April : JURNAL ILMIAH DAN KARYA MAHASISWA (JIKMA)
Publisher : Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis (ITB) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54066/jikma.v4i2.5001

Abstract

This study analyzes extractivism in Indonesia through Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom perspective. Extractivism, particularly mining and natural resource exploitation, generates economic benefits but also creates social-ecological injustice, limited public participation, and reduced community access to resources and living spaces. This study employs a qualitative method using a literature review approach. Data were obtained from books, scientific articles, reports, and relevant documents concerning extractivism, development, public participation, and Amartya Sen’s thought. The findings indicate that development should not be measured solely by economic growth, investment, or state revenue, but also by the extent to which it expands substantive freedoms and people’s capabilities. In the context of extractivism, limitations on political freedom, transparency, social opportunities, economic facilities, and protective security may increase capability deprivation among affected communities. Therefore, extractive-sector development needs to position communities as active agents of development by strengthening participation, transparency, indigenous peoples’ protection, and ecological sustainability. This perspective shifts the understanding of development from merely exploiting natural resources toward expanding people’s capabilities to live a dignified and meaningful life.