Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Dari Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Psikologis menuju Kecanduan Game Online: Analisis Kritis Perspektif Abraham Maslow Yosef Kurniawan Lagur; Maria Claudia Lodan; Bernardinus Orasio Duris; Hironimus Nara; Yosef Jemai; Maximus Nailopo; Yohanes Aurelius Gradisca; Sebastianus Takake; Valentinus Dae; Marianus Soni Jaya Mahe
Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas 45 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30640/dewantara.v5i1.7904

Abstract

Online game addiction is an increasingly prevalent phenomenon in the digital era and is associated not only with the intensity of gadget use but also with individual psychological needs and motivations. This study aims to analyze online game addiction from the perspective of Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, particularly the relationship between psychological need fulfillment and the emergence of problematic gaming behavior. This study employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method by examining relevant scholarly journals, books, and academic works. The findings indicate that online games can function as an alternative medium for fulfilling needs for safety, belonging, esteem, and self-actualization through social interaction, achievement, skill development, and escape from pressures in real life. However, these motivations do not directly cause addiction. Gaming becomes problematic when the activity is difficult to control, dominates daily life, interferes with other activities, and continues despite negative consequences. Maslow’s theory can help explain the motivations underlying gaming behavior, but it has limitations in fully explaining the development of online game addiction.
Kohabitasi (Kumpul Kebo) dalam Perspektif Relasi Aku-Engkau Martin Buber: Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Dialog Maria Claudia Lodan; Felix Riondi Sugar; Yulius Argenio Eko; Heribertus Harsoyo; Fransisco G. N. Nggajo; Champideli A. Jalni; Alfeus Alfian Nenat; Simon Oktafianus Nailiu; Antonius Sunarno Sam; Alfonsius Lulus Nifu
Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas 45 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30640/dewantara.v5i1.7694

Abstract

The phenomenon of cohabitation or living together without a legally recognized marriage has become one of the social issues developing in modern society. Changes in values, cultural development, economic factors, and shifting understandings of commitment and marriage have contributed to the increasing practice of cohabitation. In the Indonesian context, this phenomenon generates debate because it encounters legal, religious, and cultural norms that consider marriage as an important institution in human life. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of cohabitation through Martin Buber’s dialogical philosophy, particularly the concepts of the I-It and I-Thou relations. This research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach by analyzing Martin Buber’s works and various literature related to cohabitation, marriage, and human relations. The findings indicate that cohabitation cannot merely be understood as a legal or moral issue but also as a philosophical issue concerning the quality of human relationships. From Buber’s perspective, relationships oriented only toward personal needs, comfort, or specific interests tend to become I-It relations because the other person is reduced to an object. Conversely, the I-Thou relation emphasizes respect for personal dignity, openness, responsibility, and authentic encounters between individuals. Therefore, Martin Buber’s thought provides a critical reflection that human relationships should be built upon dialogue, responsibility, and respect for others as complete and valuable persons.
Analisis Korupsi di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan John Rawls Charlos Mario Y. B. Makung; Maria Claudia Lodan; Fransiskus Richardo Sukun; Yohanes Aurelius Gradisca; Heribertus Torino Kato; Sales Agung; Dionisius Ian Omenu; Teofano Jenatun; Patrisius Hasa Kego; Martinus Payong Bedaloli Hayon
Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari: Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/atmosfer.v4i1.2038

Abstract

Corruption is a serious problem in Indonesia that not only causes state financial losses but also undermines justice, equality, public trust, and the distribution of social benefits. This study aims to analyze corruption in Indonesia as a form of institutional injustice from the perspective of John Rawls's theory of justice. The study employs a qualitative method using a literature review approach. Data were obtained through an examination of books, journal articles, and scholarly sources relevant to corruption and Rawls's theory of justice. The findings indicate that corruption contradicts the principle of justice as fairness because it creates inequalities in access to power, public positions, public services, and resource distribution. Corruption also violates the principles of equal basic liberties, fair equality of opportunity, and the difference principle because corrupt benefits are obtained through unfair mechanisms and ultimately impose social costs on society, particularly disadvantaged groups. Therefore, combating corruption should focus not only on law enforcement but also on institutional reform and strengthening social justice.