Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Ekstraktivisme dan Kebebasan Masyarakat: Perspektif Development as Freedom Amartya Sen Alexandro Megano; Franjelin Fierer Woda Lukas; Ikordinus Poweng Wasini; Yohanes Aurelius Gradisca; Sales Agung; Salvinus Serafim; Antonius Sunarno Sam; Martinus Payong Bedaloli Hayon; Dionisius Ian Omenu; Benediktus Ratu Tukan
Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April : JURNAL ILMIAH DAN KARYA MAHASISWA (JIKMA)
Publisher : Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis (ITB) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54066/jikma.v4i2.5001

Abstract

This study analyzes extractivism in Indonesia through Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom perspective. Extractivism, particularly mining and natural resource exploitation, generates economic benefits but also creates social-ecological injustice, limited public participation, and reduced community access to resources and living spaces. This study employs a qualitative method using a literature review approach. Data were obtained from books, scientific articles, reports, and relevant documents concerning extractivism, development, public participation, and Amartya Sen’s thought. The findings indicate that development should not be measured solely by economic growth, investment, or state revenue, but also by the extent to which it expands substantive freedoms and people’s capabilities. In the context of extractivism, limitations on political freedom, transparency, social opportunities, economic facilities, and protective security may increase capability deprivation among affected communities. Therefore, extractive-sector development needs to position communities as active agents of development by strengthening participation, transparency, indigenous peoples’ protection, and ecological sustainability. This perspective shifts the understanding of development from merely exploiting natural resources toward expanding people’s capabilities to live a dignified and meaningful life.
Martabat, Otonomi, dan Kesejahteraan Guru: Analisis Filosofis terhadap Persoalan Upah Guru Honorer di Flores-NTT Perspektif Immanuel Kant Emanuel Boli Manuk; Yoseph Taus; Esantus Hasman; Franjelin Fierer Woda Lukas; Yeremias Remigius Bria; Lukas Tabora; Martinus Suni; Fidelis Alfiano Dasar; Marianus Sato; Ignatius Juan Pasqual
Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari: Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/atmosfer.v4i1.2066

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the issue of low wages and the welfare of honorary teachers in Flores, East Nusa Tenggara, from the perspective of Immanuel Kant's philosophy of education. Teacher welfare has generally been understood as an economic and educational management issue, although teachers' working conditions are also related to human dignity, freedom, autonomy, and moral responsibility. This study employs a qualitative method using a literature review and philosophical analysis approach. Data were obtained from books, scholarly articles, policy documents, legislation, and relevant reports concerning the welfare of honorary teachers. The analysis shows that low wages, employment uncertainty, limited facilities, and geographical challenges in Flores are not merely material problems but also involve moral and institutional justice. From Kant's perspective, teachers should be treated as ends in themselves rather than merely as means to achieve educational quality. Therefore, educational policies need to ensure working conditions that respect teachers' dignity, autonomy, and professional responsibility.