Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior

The Effect of Bullying on Depression, Academic Activity, and Communication in Adolescents in Surakarta: A Multilevel Logistic Regression Sudrajad, Kiyat; Soemanto, RB; Prasetya, Hanung
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol 5, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (583.568 KB)

Abstract

Background: Human interaction requires com­munication as a transmission of informa­tion, ideas, emotions, skills, and so on. Com­mu­nica­tion occurs when a source conveys a message to the recipient with a conscious in­ten­tion to influ­ence the recipient's behavior. One of the pro­blems in social communication is bully­ing. Bully­ing or harassment can be through words or through actions that aim to make the opponent's mental fall and pressure. The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that influence bullying against depres­sion with the Health Belief Model and Social Cognitive Theory.Subjects and Method: This was a cross-sectio­nal study conducted in junior high schools in Surakarta, in December 2019. A total sample of 250 adolescents was selected by simple random sampling. The dependent variable was bullying. The inde­pen­dent variables were perceived sus­ceptibility, perceived severity, cues to action, perceived threat, perceived benefit, perceived barrier, self-efficacy, depres­sion, academic activi­ties, and communication. The data were collected by questionnaire and analyzed by a multiple multilevel logistic regres­sion run on Stata 13.Results: Bullying increased depression (b= 3.69; 95% CI= 1.51 to 9.00; p= 0.004) and poor communication (b= 4.95; 95% CI= 2.24 to 10.89; p <0.001). Bullying decreased academic achievement (b= - 5.68; 95% CI= -12.33 to -2.62; p<0.001). School had strong contextual effect on depression with ICC= ICC= 20.91%.Conclusion: Bullying increases depression and poor communication. Bullying decreases academic achievement. School has strong con­textual effect on depression.Keywords: bullying, depression, Health Belief Model, Social Cognitive TheoryCorrespondence: Kiyat Sudrajad. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Su­ta­mi 36 A, Surakarta, 57126, Central Java. Ema­il­: kiyatrambo­@gmail.com. Mobile: +628­5­6­47­1­16834.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2020), 05(02): 79-86https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.02.02
Effects of Social Support, Functional Status, and Depression on the Quality of Life of Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis Wahyudi, Anwar; Tamtomo, Didik Gunawan; Soemanto, RB
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol 5, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (32.088 KB)

Abstract

Background: Stroke patients have physical, social, and psychological disorders. It inhibits their daily activities, thus affecting the quality of life. This study aimed to analyze the effect of social support, functional status, and depress­ion on the quality of life of stroke patients.Subjects and Method: This study was a meta-analysis study. The data were obtained from Clinical Key, DOAJ, PubMed, Science Direct, Proquest, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The keywords were "social support" AND "functional status" AND "depression" AND "quality of life "AND" stroke". The articles were published from January 1991 to September 2020. The articles studied were full-text-articles with a cross-sectional and cohort study design. The articles were collected using the PRISMA diagram and analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 program.Results: This study obtained 12 articles consisted of 2,015 selected stroke patients. The result of the meta-analysis showed that social support had a significant positive effect on the quality of life of stroke patients (b= 0.03; 95% CI= 0.02 to 0.05; p= 0.0001), functional status had a significant positive effect on the quality of life of stroke patients (b= 0.63; 95% CI= 0.52 to 1.08; p=0.0001), and depression had a significant negative effect on the quality of life of stroke patients (b= -0.18; 95%CI= -0.26 to -0.10; p=0.0001).Conclusion: Social support and functional status improve the quality of life of stroke patients. Depression reduces the quality of life of stroke patients.Keywords: social support, functional status, depression, quality of life, strokeCorrespondence: Anwar Wahyudi. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, JL. Ir Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: arwanwahyudi851@gmail.com. Mobile: +62813106121049.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2020), 05(04): 284-295https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.04.06. 
Effect of Bullying on the Risk of Anxiety and Social Interaction Disorder among Senior High School in Yogyakarta Privetera, Hainas Sani; Soemanto, RB; Prasetya, Hanung
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol 5, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (32.493 KB)

Abstract

Background: Bullying is a widespread pheno­menon among young people and is used to describe interpersonal relationships charac­te­rized by an imbalance of power. The Indone­sian Child Protection Commission noted that there were 161 cases of bullying in 2018. Ado­lescents who are involved in bullying expe­ri­ence risks such as psychiatric symptoms, alco­hol and drug abuse and even suicide. This study aims to analyze the effects of bullying on self-concept and social disorders in high school students in Sleman Yogyakarta.Subjects and Method: This study used a cross sectional study design. This study was conducted in Sleman Regency in August 2019. The sample was taken by using stratified ran­dom sampling with a total of 200 senior high school students. The independent variables include parental education, social environment, anxiety level, self-concept, and social interac­tion disorders. The dependent variable was bullying behavior. Data were collected using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed by using multilevel multiple logistic regression with stata 13.Results: Low family education (b= 3.11; 95% CI= 0.83 to 3.67; p= 0.002), social environ­ment in the city (b=3.15; 95% CI= 0.71 to 3.09; p= 0.002), have social media (b=4.13; 95% CI= 1.46 to 3.83; p= 0.000), have a level of anxiety (b= 2.92; 95% CI= 0.62 to 3.17; p= 0.005), negative self-concept (b=2.83; 95% CI= 0.62 to 3.40; p= 0.005), social interaction disorder (b= 3.23; 95% CI= 0.87 to 3.55; p= 0.001) increased the likelihood of experiencing bullying in adolescents. Variations at the school level indicated that there was a contextual influence on bullying behavior (ICC= 13.18%).Conclusion: There is a statistically significant influence of parental education, social environ­ment, social media, anxiety levels, self-concept, and social interaction disorders on bullying behavior in adolescents. Variations at the level of school show that there is a contextual influ­ence on bullying behavior in adolescents.Keywords: bullying, adolescents, multi­level analysisCorrespondence: Hainas Sani Privetera. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: sariprivitera@gmail.com. Mobile: +628­2328848001.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2020), 05(04): 306-316https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.04.08. 
The Effect of Bullying on Depression, Academic Activity, and Communication in Adolescents in Surakarta: A Multilevel Logistic Regression Sudrajad, Kiyat; Soemanto, RB; Prasetya, Hanung
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Human interaction requires com­munication as a transmission of informa­tion, ideas, emotions, skills, and so on. Com­mu­nica­tion occurs when a source conveys a message to the recipient with a conscious in­ten­tion to influ­ence the recipient's behavior. One of the pro­blems in social communication is bully­ing. Bully­ing or harassment can be through words or through actions that aim to make the opponent's mental fall and pressure. The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that influence bullying against depres­sion with the Health Belief Model and Social Cognitive Theory.Subjects and Method: This was a cross-sectio­nal study conducted in junior high schools in Surakarta, in December 2019. A total sample of 250 adolescents was selected by simple random sampling. The dependent variable was bullying. The inde­pen­dent variables were perceived sus­ceptibility, perceived severity, cues to action, perceived threat, perceived benefit, perceived barrier, self-efficacy, depres­sion, academic activi­ties, and communication. The data were collected by questionnaire and analyzed by a multiple multilevel logistic regres­sion run on Stata 13.Results: Bullying increased depression (b= 3.69; 95% CI= 1.51 to 9.00; p= 0.004) and poor communication (b= 4.95; 95% CI= 2.24 to 10.89; p <0.001). Bullying decreased academic achievement (b= - 5.68; 95% CI= -12.33 to -2.62; p<0.001). School had strong contextual effect on depression with ICC= ICC= 20.91%.Conclusion: Bullying increases depression and poor communication. Bullying decreases academic achievement. School has strong con­textual effect on depression.Keywords: bullying, depression, Health Belief Model, Social Cognitive TheoryCorrespondence: Kiyat Sudrajad. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Su­ta­mi 36 A, Surakarta, 57126, Central Java. Ema­il­: kiyatrambo­@gmail.com. Mobile: +628­5­6­47­1­16834.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2020), 05(02): 79-86https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.02.02
Effects of Social Support, Functional Status, and Depression on the Quality of Life of Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis Wahyudi, Anwar; Tamtomo, Didik Gunawan; Soemanto, RB
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 5 No. 4 (2020)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Stroke patients have physical, social, and psychological disorders. It inhibits their daily activities, thus affecting the quality of life. This study aimed to analyze the effect of social support, functional status, and depress­ion on the quality of life of stroke patients.Subjects and Method: This study was a meta-analysis study. The data were obtained from Clinical Key, DOAJ, PubMed, Science Direct, Proquest, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The keywords were "social support" AND "functional status" AND "depression" AND "quality of life "AND" stroke". The articles were published from January 1991 to September 2020. The articles studied were full-text-articles with a cross-sectional and cohort study design. The articles were collected using the PRISMA diagram and analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 program.Results: This study obtained 12 articles consisted of 2,015 selected stroke patients. The result of the meta-analysis showed that social support had a significant positive effect on the quality of life of stroke patients (b= 0.03; 95% CI= 0.02 to 0.05; p= 0.0001), functional status had a significant positive effect on the quality of life of stroke patients (b= 0.63; 95% CI= 0.52 to 1.08; p=0.0001), and depression had a significant negative effect on the quality of life of stroke patients (b= -0.18; 95%CI= -0.26 to -0.10; p=0.0001).Conclusion: Social support and functional status improve the quality of life of stroke patients. Depression reduces the quality of life of stroke patients.Keywords: social support, functional status, depression, quality of life, strokeCorrespondence: Anwar Wahyudi. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, JL. Ir Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: arwanwahyudi851@gmail.com. Mobile: +62813106121049.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2020), 05(04): 284-295https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.04.06. 
Effect of Bullying on the Risk of Anxiety and Social Interaction Disorder among Senior High School in Yogyakarta Privetera, Hainas Sani; Soemanto, RB; Prasetya, Hanung
Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior Vol. 5 No. 4 (2020)
Publisher : Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Bullying is a widespread pheno­menon among young people and is used to describe interpersonal relationships charac­te­rized by an imbalance of power. The Indone­sian Child Protection Commission noted that there were 161 cases of bullying in 2018. Ado­lescents who are involved in bullying expe­ri­ence risks such as psychiatric symptoms, alco­hol and drug abuse and even suicide. This study aims to analyze the effects of bullying on self-concept and social disorders in high school students in Sleman Yogyakarta.Subjects and Method: This study used a cross sectional study design. This study was conducted in Sleman Regency in August 2019. The sample was taken by using stratified ran­dom sampling with a total of 200 senior high school students. The independent variables include parental education, social environment, anxiety level, self-concept, and social interac­tion disorders. The dependent variable was bullying behavior. Data were collected using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed by using multilevel multiple logistic regression with stata 13.Results: Low family education (b= 3.11; 95% CI= 0.83 to 3.67; p= 0.002), social environ­ment in the city (b=3.15; 95% CI= 0.71 to 3.09; p= 0.002), have social media (b=4.13; 95% CI= 1.46 to 3.83; p= 0.000), have a level of anxiety (b= 2.92; 95% CI= 0.62 to 3.17; p= 0.005), negative self-concept (b=2.83; 95% CI= 0.62 to 3.40; p= 0.005), social interaction disorder (b= 3.23; 95% CI= 0.87 to 3.55; p= 0.001) increased the likelihood of experiencing bullying in adolescents. Variations at the school level indicated that there was a contextual influence on bullying behavior (ICC= 13.18%).Conclusion: There is a statistically significant influence of parental education, social environ­ment, social media, anxiety levels, self-concept, and social interaction disorders on bullying behavior in adolescents. Variations at the level of school show that there is a contextual influ­ence on bullying behavior in adolescents.Keywords: bullying, adolescents, multi­level analysisCorrespondence: Hainas Sani Privetera. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: sariprivitera@gmail.com. Mobile: +628­2328848001.Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior (2020), 05(04): 306-316https://doi.org/10.26911/thejhpb.2020.05.04.08.