Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Humaniora

Sisi Positif dan Negatif Persaingan Antarstasiun Televisi di Indonesia di Mata Penonton Televisi Irawan, Rahmat Edi
Humaniora Vol 3, No 1 (2012): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v3i1.3247

Abstract

Article was aimed to reveal how both positive and negative sides of competition among television stations in Indonesia was seen from their programs seen by television viewers. The study used qualitative methods to get an overview of the phenomena occurring at the social phenomenon. Data were collected by observation and documentary. Observations were made to the programs presented by various television stations, while the documentary was to process data and share ratings released by AGB Nielsen throughout the year 2011.  The results show that the competitions between television stations happened today have not presented many positive sides from the viewers because of the limited programs offered in Indonesia. In fact, many programs are aired only a repeatation of the previous successful ones. 
Persepsi Praktisi Penyiaran terhadap Regulasi Penyiaran di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Program Empat Mata dan Bukan Empat Mata Di Trans7 Irawan, Rahmat Edi
Humaniora Vol 2, No 2 (2011): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v2i2.3161

Abstract

Broadcasting regulation is one interesting thing to be observed in Indonesia?s television industry development. One television program that mostly having violation of the regulation is Empat Mata which continued with Bukan Empat Mata broadcasted by Trans7. This supports the researcher to do research about how the exact perception of broadcasting practitioners towards broadcasting regulation in Indonesia. The result of qualitative research, which collects data through observation and literature study, shows there is lack of knowledge in broadcasting practitioners about Indonesia?s Broadcasting Commission (KPI) and broadcasting regulation in Indonesia. Besides less socialization, multi-interpretation troubles in some regulations are the probable cause of increasing numbers of violation towards broadcasting regulations. As preventing action, it needs to have open dialog between KPI and broadcasting practitioners as bridging communication of their different authorities, which would be useful to increase quality of television show in Indonesia.