Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology

Comparative Analysis of Compressive Strength of Steel Tubing Pipe Welding Results Using SMAW and MIG Welding with 140A Current Prasetia, Tengku Geby; Ariyon, Muhammad; Fitriani, Fitriani; Sebayang, Alexander; Tarigan, Efrata
International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology Vol 5, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Malikussaleh University, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52088/ijesty.v5i1.644

Abstract

The welding process plays a crucial role in manufacturing and is inseparable from its advancement. Deutsche Industrie Norman (DIN) defines welding as creating a metallurgical bond at the joint of metal or alloy metals in their molten state. This process is essential for constructing strong, durable materials like plates, steel, and pipes. Bending tests, including face bend and root bend, are often conducted to evaluate the quality of welded joints. These tests assess welded materials’ toughness, strength, and resistance under specific loading conditions. This study employed two welding techniques: Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) and Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW). GMAW, called Metal Inert Gas (MIG) welding, uses argon or helium as protective gases and a continuously fed electrode wire. On the other hand, SMAW relies on flux-coated electrodes to create the weld seam, with molten metal from both the electrode and parent material filling the joint. The results revealed distinct advantages for each method. The highest bending test value for the root bend was achieved with MIG welding at 982,55 Kgf/mm², demonstrating its effectiveness in creating durable root joints. Conversely, SMAW exhibited superior performance in face bend tests, achieving a bending strength of 104111 Kgf/mm², making it ideal for surface-level joint applications. Both techniques displayed no visible cracks in their welds, ensuring compliance with industry standards and confirming their reliability for various manufacturing needs. These findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate welding methods based on specific application requirements.
Comparative Analysis of Tensile Strength of Steel Tubing Pipe Welding Results Using SMAW and MIG Welding with 140A Current Tri Aulia, Yuni; Ariyon, Muhammad; Fitriani, Fitriani; Sebayang, Alexander; Tarigan, Efrata
International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology Vol 5, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Malikussaleh University, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52088/ijesty.v5i1.645

Abstract

Welding is a crucial technology in modern manufacturing processes, widely applied in automotive, oil refineries, and other industries. This study focuses on two standard welding techniques: Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) and Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW). GMAW uses argon gas as a shielding gas, and the ER70S-6 electrode has a 1.0 mm diameter, while SMAW employs the E7018 electrode with a 2.6 mm diameter. Both methods are tested on ASTM 106 Grade B steel, a commonly used material in various industries. The primary goal of this research is to evaluate the tensile strength of steel specimens welded using MIG and SMAW. The tensile strength of raw material, as well as the welded materials, is measured to assess the quality of the welds. The results show that the tensile strength of the raw material is 648.26 kgf/mm². After welding, the tensile strength for the MIG-welded material is 540.79 kgf/mm², while the SMAW-welded material achieves a higher tensile strength of 616.17 kgf/mm². These values highlight the significant difference in performance between the two welding techniques. SMAW welding provides the best joint quality among the two methods, with a tensile strength value of 616.17 kgf/mm². This study underscores the importance of selecting the appropriate welding technique based on the desired strength and application, with SMAW proving superior for this particular material. These findings contribute valuable insights into material technology and welding, offering a reference for future industrial applications.
Study of the Effect of Post Weld Heat Treatment on the Bending Strength of Weld Joints in SMAW and GMAW Methods in Root Bend Areas and Face Bend on ASTM A106 Grade B Paskel, M. Piere Sam; Ariyon, Muhammad; Fitrianti, Fitrianti; Herawati, Ira; Sebayang, Alexander; Tarigan, Efrata; Idhamkamil, Idhamkamil; Tarigan, Liwat
International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology Vol 5, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Malikussaleh University, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52088/ijesty.v5i2.850

Abstract

This study evaluates the effect of Post Weld Heat Treatment (PWHT) on the bending strength of raw materials and welding joints using SMAW and GMAW welding methods. Tests were conducted on root and face bends to compare bending strength before and after PWHT treatment. The test results show that in the root bend area, the base material without PWHT has a bending strength of 3983.16 MPa, while in SMAW and GMAW welding, the bending strength is 3788.39 MPa and 2695.96 MPa, respectively. After PWHT was applied, the bending strength of the base material increased to 4739.76 MPa, while that of SMAW and GMAW welding increased to 4131.62 MPa and 5193.39 MPa, respectively. In the face bend area, the base material without PWHT showed a bending strength of 3077.70 MPa, with SMAW and GMAW welding producing bending strengths of 2654.28 MPa and 2259.32 MPa, respectively. After PWHT, the bending strength of the base material increased to 3289.05 MPa, while SMAW and GMAW welding recorded 2641.47 MPa and 3498.07 MPa, respectively. This study's results indicate that PWHT significantly improves bending strength, especially in the base material and weld joints in the root bend area.
Evaluation of Weld Joint Quality in Drill Pipe Based on Heat Input Variation in Bending and Microstructure Test Sebayang, Alexander; Tarigan, Efrata; Kamil, Idham; Sutrisno, Joko
International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology Vol 6, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Malikussaleh University, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52088/ijesty.v6i1.1795

Abstract

Drill pipes are critical components in oil, gas, and geothermal drilling operations, serving as conduits for circulating drilling fluids from the surface to the borehole while simultaneously transmitting mechanical loads. Due to severe operating conditions, including high pressure, cyclic loading, and corrosive environments, the integrity of welded joints in drill pipes must be ensured through appropriate welding methods and quality evaluation. This study investigates the effects of heat input variations on the mechanical properties and microstructural characteristics of welded joints in ASTM A106 Grade B steel pipes produced using Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) and Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW). Welding was performed using a single V-groove butt joint configuration in the 1G position with a constant welding current of 140 A. SMAW welding employed E7018 electrodes, while GMAW utilized ER70S-6 filler wire with a shielding gas mixture of 70% argon and 30% CO?. Mechanical performance was evaluated through bending tests, including root and face bends, in accordance with applicable standards. In addition, microstructural analysis of the weld metal and Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) was conducted using optical microscopy after chemical etching to identify phase distribution and grain morphology. The bending test results revealed that SMAW-welded joints exhibited higher ultimate stress (?u) values than GMAW-welded joints. The highest ?u value of 1327.14 MPa was obtained from the SMAW face bend specimen, while the lowest value of 922.10 MPa was recorded for the GMAW root bend specimen. Furthermore, face-bend tests consistently yielded higher ?u values than root-bend tests for both welding methods, indicating superior mechanical resistance at the weld surface. Microstructural observations showed that SMAW welds exhibited coarser ferrite–pearlite grain structures due to higher heat input and slower cooling rates associated with flux-covered electrodes. In contrast, GMAW welds exhibited finer, more homogeneous microstructures due to lower heat input and faster cooling rates. These differences in microstructure significantly influenced the mechanical behaviour of the welded joints. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into selecting welding methods for ASTM A106 Grade B pipes, particularly in applications that require a balance between mechanical strength and microstructural stability