Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Law Research Review Quarterly Action Research Literate (ARL) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Reformasi Hukum Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Ananto, Riana Wulandari
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Reformasi Hukum

 1 
Rethinking Fiduciary Security Execution in Debtor Default Disputes: Case Study of Decision No. 297/Pdt.G/2023/PN BPP Ananto, Riana Wulandari
Reformasi Hukum Vol 29 No 3 (2025): December Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46257/jrh.v29i3.1406

Abstract

Fiduciary security agreements grant creditors the right to execute secured assets without prior judicial authorization, provided that the security has been duly registered and evidenced by a Fiduciary Security Certificate under Law No. 42 of 1999. However, the execution of fiduciary collateral in debtor default disputes continues to raise questions regarding the limits of creditor authority and the protection of debtor rights. This study examines the legal basis and procedural mechanism of fiduciary security execution in cases of default, with particular attention to the principles of legal certainty, utility, and justice. Employing a normative legal method, the research analyzes statutory provisions, doctrinal interpretations, and judicial reasoning, focusing on Decision No. 297/PDT.G/2023/PN Bpp. The findings indicate that courts recognize the enforceability of fiduciary execution without litigation when formal registration requirements are satisfied, while rejecting additional claims such as material damages and coercive penalties due to insufficient legal grounds. The study concludes that fiduciary execution remains legally valid within the existing statutory framework but must be conducted proportionally and in a manner that respects debtor protections. Clear procedural standards and consistent oversight are therefore necessary to ensure a balanced and predictable secured transactions regime.
Co-Authors Elvin, Elvin Endang Suprapti Erna Amalia, Erna Ginting, Elianta Lailasari Ekaningsih Panggabbean, Tardip Siti Hajar Utama, Mohammad Wira