Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Penyuluhan Hukum Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Kurang Mampu Adnan, La Ode; Dewi, Rasmala; Salam, Safrin; Mansyah, Muh Sutri
Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jh.v4i1.531

Abstract

Bahwa kesamaan kedudukan hukum bagi setiap warga Negara telah dilindungi oleh konstitusi sebagai wujud perlindungan hak asasi manusia dalam memenuhi rasa keadilan hukum. Jaminan kesamaan dihadapan hukum tersebut harus dijunjung tinggi tampa kecuali sebagaimana dimanahkan dalam Pasal 27 ayat (1) UUD 1945, hal ini sejalan dengan doktrin Hukum yang menyatakan bahwa keadilan harus dapat diakses oleh semua warga negara tanpa terkecuali (justice for all/accessible to all)”. Namun akses hukum dan keadilan belum sepenuhnya menyentuh lapisan masyarakat tidak mampu, olehnya itu dipandang perlu ada sarana untuk dapat menfasilitasi layanan bantuan hukum cuma-cuma/ gratis bagi masyarakat tidak mampu. Melalui kegiatan penyuluhan hukum dengan tujuan meningkatkan pemahaman dan pengetahuan hukum masyarakat terkait pemberian Bantuan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Tidak Mampu yang diselenggarakan oleh Pemerintah dengan menggunakan metode tatap muka langsung, agar masyarakat dapat mengetahui tata cara memperoleh layanan bantuan hukum gratis sehingga mewujudkan perubahan sosial yang berkedilan.
The Concept of "Austin and Jeremy Bentham" and Its Relevance to the Construction of Indigenous People Salam, Safrin; Karim, La Ode Muhammad; Gurusi, La; Kaswandi, Kaswandi; Tonny, Fajrin; Dewi, Rasmala
Journal of Transcendental Law Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Transcendental Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jtl.v6i1.4153

Abstract

The concepts of positivism and utilitarian schools show differences in regulating or interpreting society and individual rights. The purpose of this research is to find the views of the pure law school and the utilitarian law school in reconstructing indigenous peoples. This research uses normative legal research. In its study, this research uses several approaches, namely the statutory approach and the concept approach. The results showed that John Austin's pure legal school places the construction of indigenous peoples in the standard norms contained in Article 18 B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. This flow limits the interpretation of the construction of indigenous peoples. Meanwhile, according to the utilitarian legal school of Jeremy Bentham, the view of Article 18 B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution as the basis for the construction of indigenous peoples shifts by interpreting the existence of indigenous peoples is not only seen as law an sich, but the legal regulation of legal communities is seen in 3 (three) aspects, namely a) indigenous peoples are seen in the position of legal reality; b) Customary law becomes a translation of the legal provisions referred to in Article 18 B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution; c) Recognition and protection of the law of indigenous peoples are constructed in the aspect of legal reality. Thus, the utilitarian school of law opens a new approach in the construction of indigenous peoples that is not only reviewed from the norms an sich in statutory regulations but the existence of utilitarian schools of law can be used to open more lively legal spaces in constructing recognition and protection of the rights of indigenous peoples as subjects of law.