Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.85
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Konstitusi Justitia et Pax TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Literasi Hukum Jurnal Jatiswara Jurnal Yudisial Keadilan Jurnal CREPIDO: Jurnal Mengenai Dasar-Dasar Pemikiran Hukum Filsafat dan Ilmu Hukum The Journal of Contemporary Sociological Issues (CSI) Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Atma Inovasia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Law and Justice Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Keadilan Domus Legalis Cogitatio Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar
Widiastiani, Nindry Sulistya
Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
A Regulatory Time Bomb: Can Singapore’s Model Rescue Indonesia’s Gig Economy? Nindry Sulistya Widiastiani
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 25 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2025.25.3.15868

Abstract

Platform workers who work through digital applications such as online transportation and delivery services are growing in Indonesia, but their legal status is still unclear. The incompatibility between the platform's work model and conventional labor regulations results in platform workers not receiving legal protection, social security, or recognition of formal employment relationships. This article examines these problems using normative legal research methods and comparative approaches by comparing the Indonesian legal system with Singapore's policies through the Platform Workers Act 2024. The legal materials include laws and regulations, jurisprudence, and related literature. The study results show that Indonesia still relies on inadequate partial regulation to address the protection needs of platform workers. At the same time, Singapore has taken a progressive step by recognizing the status of platform workers as a separate legal entity with fundamental rights, such as social security, the right to form associations, protection against work injuries, and income transparency. The novel finding of this study lies in identifying the hybrid employment model as a feasible and legally sound framework to bridge the gap between full-time employment and independent contracting in Indonesia. This model not only aligns with Singapore’s adaptive regulatory approach but also offers a policy blueprint for equitable protection without undermining digital innovation. The broader implication is clear: without a comprehensive legal reform that institutionalizes hybrid employment, Indonesia risks entrenching a two-tier labor system that perpetuates inequality within its rapidly expanding digital economy.
DUKUNGAN NORMATIF BAGI PEKERJA PEREMPUAN DENGAN TANGGUNG JAWAB KELUARGA: UU KETENAGAKERJAAN HINGGA UU CIPTA KERJA Widiastiani, Nindry Sulistya
TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): VOLUME 10 NUMBER 1, 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/tlj.v10i1.93962

Abstract

This article analyses the existence of normative support for women workers with family responsibilities in Indonesian labour law. The social structure of Indonesian society still views the function of family care as the responsibility of women. Therefore, working women are burdened with dual functions as workers and holders of care responsibilities. Both functions can lead to discrimination in the workplace for women workers. Normative support to protect these female workers is critical to note. The analysis was carried out by examining the regulations in the Manpower Act and the 2023 Job Creation Act. The analysis results show that the Acts contain several articles that provide normative support for women workers with family responsibilities, although they are not yet comprehensive and firm. First, this support is reflected in the regulations that require employers to consider the needs of workers and their families, both in employment relationships and in social security. Second, some provisions prohibit layoffs based on family responsibilities. In addition to these explicit regulations, several provisions can be implicitly interpreted as normative support for women workers with family responsibilities"”first, special regulations on reproductive health protection. Second, provisions mention the involvement of family or heirs in employment rights. Third, the recognition of significant events involving workers"™ families. However, existing regulations are still inadequate in providing comprehensive normative support for women workers with family responsibilities. Indonesia should immediately ratify the International Labour Organization Convention Number 156 to strengthen such protection.
STRUKTUR PERLINDUNGAN PENETAPAN UPAH MINIMUM DI INDONESIA DAN KAMBOJA: PERLINDUNGAN BERLAPIS DAN FUNGSI MEKANISME TRIPARTIT Nindry Sulistya Widiastiani; Re Pengleang
Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Sulawesi Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31605/j-law.v9i2.6569

Abstract

Regulasi upah minimum merupakan instrumen penting dalam hukum ketenagakerjaan untuk menjamin penghidupan yang layak bagi pekerja sekaligus menjaga stabilitas pasar kerja. Meskipun Indonesia dan Kamboja sama-sama menganut tradisi civil law dan memiliki sistem penetapan upah minimum yang diatur dalam hukum nasional, penelitian terdahulu umumnya mengkaji kedua negara secara terpisah atau berfokus pada hasil penetapan upah, sehingga hubungan antara desain kelembagaan dan fungsi mekanisme tripartit masih terbatas dianalisis dalam perspektif hukum komparatif. Artikel ini mengisi kekosongan tersebut dengan membandingkan struktur pengaturan upah minimum di Indonesia dan Kamboja, yang dipilih karena memiliki tradisi hukum yang sama, tetapi mengembangkan desain kelembagaan pengupahan yang berbeda. Dengan menggunakan metode hukum komparatif, penelitian ini menganalisis dua dimensi utama, yaitu struktur perlindungan upah dan fungsi mekanisme tripartit dalam penetapan upah minimum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia menerapkan layered protection system melalui cakupan upah minimum yang bersifat universal dengan diferensiasi sektoral yang terbatas, sementara mekanisme tripartitnya bersifat prosedural karena penyesuaian upah didasarkan pada formula yang ditetapkan dalam peraturan perundang- undangan. Sebaliknya, Kamboja menerapkan selective protection system yang hanya mencakup sektor tertentu, tetapi mekanisme tripartitnya bersifat substantif melalui negosiasi langsung tanpa formula yang mengikat. Temuan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa karakter struktur pengaturan upah minimum ditentukan oleh interaksi antara struktur perlindungan hukum dan tata kelola kelembagaan, serta menawarkan kerangka analisis baru berbasis kedua dimensi tersebut untuk memperkaya kajian hukum ketenagakerjaan komparatif.
Co-Authors Alfyanti, Maria Veronica Amara Angelita, Maya Ardhiawan, Nicolas Raditya Beraya, Fransiska Millenia A L B Christine Christine Christiyanto, Laurensius Erdin Damanik, Justin Gamaliel Daniel Daniel Elisabeth Sundari Febriana, Agata Nadia Hadinata, Michael Evan Hananta, Juninho Yudistira Incharisma, Maria Indrakusuma, F. X. Bagas Irawan, Florencia Irene Juniyati, Juniyati Kinesto, Pius Bagas Vando Kirana, Stephani Nindya Krisnawardhani, Katarina Intan Rizky Kusumatriawan, Ardhiel Junico A Latumahina, Bill Samuel Marlissa, Morgan Gerhardt Meriliandi, Kadek Wahyu Fitriaputi Modjanggo, Irmalani Mulyadi, Fani Mulyono, Romi Kurniawan Agni Nugraha, Geraldus Harry Nugrahanto, Cornelius Septian Nur Aini Nurmawan, Mardatungga Pangestuti, Patricia Aurelia U Pima, Nike Naka Pramana, Isidorus Risang Tanaya Deva Prianda, Elga Ariana Putra, Libertus Anggit Martini L Radjab, Ukhra Niyantama Re Pengleang Rufi'i Santosa, Kurnia Richard Saputra, Justyn Rudes Saragih, Nia Handayani Septiari, Ni Luh Putu Karina Setiawan, Agnes Nathalia Pramudyanti Sijabat, Okthalia Larasati Simbolon, Angelita Rogabe T Siswahyudianto Surbakti, Yemima Apriesti Dameria Tabita, Skolastika Gadis Tanuwijaya, Shania Angeline Warang, Florentinus Valeri Wicaksana, Dhaniel Satria Widi, Dionysius Nova Sesoco Zwageri, Lorenzo Baptista