Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Kalabbirang Law Journal

Penegakan Hukum Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Hambali, Azwad Rachmat
Kalabbirang Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Kalabbirang Law Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Al Ahmar (AHMAR Institute)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.kalabbirang36

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisi pendekatan hukum melalui pendekatan restorative justice penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif. Sumber data yang diperoleh melalui penelitian lapangan, maupun studi dokumen. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa sebagai suatu filosofi pemidanaan, restorative justice dapat membingkai berbagai kebijakan, gagasan program dan strategi penanganan perkara pidana sehingga diharapkan hasil proses tersebut dapat menciptakan keadilan yang dirasakan oleh pelaku, korban dan masyarakat serta menjawab berbagai permasalahan yang dihadapi oleh sistem peradilan pidana saat ini. This study aims to analyze legal issues through reforming restorative justice to request criminal cases. This study used qualitative research methods. Sources of data obtained through field research, or document studies. The results of the research find facts as a philosophy of criminalization, restorative justice can frame various policies, programs and case planning strategies requiring results that can be made related to disputes, victims and the community related to solving the problems raised by the justice system.
Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Peradilan Pidana Anak di Pengadilan Negeri Watansoppeng Kantao, A. Sudarman; Hambali, Azwad Rachmat; Bima, Muh. Rinaldy
Kalabbirang Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Kalabbirang Law Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Al Ahmar (AHMAR Institute)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.kalabbirang166

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dan memperoleh pemahaman terhadap penerapan nilai serta hambatan dalam penerapan keadilan restoratif pada perkara peradilan pidana anak sesuai dengan Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dalam rangka memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi Anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum dan kendala yang dihadapi majelis hakim pengadilan Negeri watansoppeng dalam menerapkan keadilan restoratif untuk mengadili tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terkait proses persidangan terhadap kasus anak, hakim Pengadilan Negeri Watansoppeng senantiasa mengupayakan penerapan restoratif justice dengan memberi saran kepada korban, terdakwa dan pihak keluarga untuk mengusahakan perdamaian sebagai upaya penyelesaian kasus di luar jalur persidangan, namun upaya tersebut seringkali ditolak oleh korban dan keluarganya dan menginginkan agar pelaku dihukum seberat-beratnya. Faktor Kebudayaan dari keluarga korban inilah yang tidak mendukung penyelesaian perkara di luar peradilan atau perdamaian. This study aims to analyze and gain an understanding of the application of values ​​and obstacles in the application of restorative justice in juvenile criminal justice cases in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children in order to provide legal protection for children who are in conflict with the law and the obstacles they face. watansoppeng District Court panel of judges in implementing restorative justice to adjudicate crimes committed by children. The results showed that in relation to the trial process for juvenile cases, the judges at the Watansoppeng District Court always tried to apply restorative justice by advising victims, defendants and their families to seek peace as an effort to resolve cases outside the court, but these efforts were often rejected by the victim and his family and wants the perpetrator to be punished as severely as possible. The cultural factor of the victim's family does not support the settlement of cases outside the court or peace.
Kemerdekaan Hakim Dan Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakima Dalam Konsep Negara Hukum Hambali, Azwad Rachmat
Kalabbirang Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Kalabbirang Law Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Al Ahmar (AHMAR Institute)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.kalabbirang278

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis kemerdekaan hakim dan kemandirian kehakiman dalam konsep negara hukum. Metode Penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normative, Hasil penelitian bahwa Kemerdekaan Hakim dan kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman sebagai penjelmaan konsep Negara Hukum sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1 ayat 3 Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik indonesia Tahun 1945 (hasil amandemen) beserta beberapa peraturan perundang undangan yang terkait seperti Undang Undang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Undang Undang Mahkamah Agung, Undang Undang Komisi Yudisial serta ketetapan MPR yang merupakan rujukan dalam pelaksanan Kemerdekaan Hakim, dan kemandirian personal, kemandirian substantive ,kemandirian internal serta kemandirian institusi. Rekomendasi mewujudkan konsep Negara Hukum perlu ditata peraturan perundang undangan yang menjamin kemerdekaan Hakim dan Kemandirian Kekuasaan. The research objective is to analyze the independence of judges and the independence of the judiciary in the concept of a rule of law. The research method uses normative legal research. The results show that the independence of judges and the independence of the judicial power as the embodiment of the concept of the rule of law as regulated in Article 1 paragraph 3 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (amendments) along with several related laws and regulations such as the Law Judicial Power, the Law on the Supreme Court, the Judicial Commission Law and the MPR decrees which are references in the implementation of Judges' Independence, and personal independence, substantive independence, internal independence and institutional independence. Recommendations to embody the concept of a rule of law need to put in place laws and regulations that guarantee the independence of judges and independence of power.