Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SIGn Jurnal Hukum AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Journal of Scientech Research and Development
Saputra, Asbudi Dwi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
HAKIKAT PERJANJIAN REKLAMASI PANTAI ANTARA INVESTOR DENGAN PEMERINTAH PROVINSI SULAWESI SELATAN Saputra, Asbudi Dwi
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 21 No 1: Mei 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (314.591 KB) | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v21i1.14

Abstract

Itself the reclamation agreement between the Government of South Sulawesi province with investors have not materialized as it should be, because in the reclamation agreement has ignored the principles in contract law and the terms of a legal contract. There are discrepancies in the legislation between Article 8 of the Regulation of the Minister of Marine and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 / Candy-Kp / 2014 concerning the licensing of reclamation in coastal regions and small islands with Presidential Decree No. 122 of 2012 on reclamation in coastal regions and small islands and Act No. 23 of 2014 on local government authority to permit the location of the reclamation. AbstrakPerjanjian reklamasi itu sendiri antara Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan dengan investor belum terwujud sebagaimana mestinya, karena dalam perjanjian reklamasi telah mengabaikan prinsip-prinsip dalam hukum kontrak dan ketentuan-ketentuan kontrak hukum. Ada perbedaan dalam undang-undang antara Pasal 8 Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 / Candy-Kp / 2014 tentang perizinan reklamasi di wilayah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil dengan Keputusan Presiden No. 122 dari 2012 tentang reklamasi di wilayah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil dan Undang-Undang No. 23 tahun 2014 tentang otoritas pemerintah daerah untuk mengizinkan lokasi reklamasi.
EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERTAMBANGAN EMAS ILEGAL DI KABUPATEN LUWU Saputra, Asbudi Dwi
Journal of Scientech Research and Development Vol 6 No 2 (2024): JSRD, December 2024
Publisher : Ikatan Dosen Menulis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56670/jsrd.v6i2.647

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan atas Undang undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 Tentang Penambangan Mineral dan Batubara adalah undang-undang yang mengatur mengenai kegiatan pertambangan mineral dan batubara di Indonesia. Undang-undang ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengatur pengelolaan sumber daya mineral dan batubara secara berkelanjutan, mengoptimalkan manfaat ekonomi, dan melindungi kepentingan nasional serta lingkungan hidup. Desa Kadundung Kecamatan Latimojong Kabupaten Luwu merupakan salah satu daerah yang memilki sumber daya mineral yang melimpah, terkhusus pada mineral jenis emas, yang harus di kelola dengan baik agar dapat menjadi sumber pendapatan bagi daerah. Namun faktanya sebaliknya Desa Kadundung menjadi lokasi penambangan emas ilegal yang mengakibatkan pencemaran air sungai oleh merkuri sehingga sumber air menjadi tercemar dan tidak bisa dikonsumsi. Hasil Penelitian menyimpulkan kegiatan penambangan emas ilegal terus berlangsung karena penegakan hukum belum efektif. Faktor yang menghambat penegakan hukum yaitu aparat penegak hukum, sarana dan prasarana serta kesadaran hukum masyarakat yang melakukan aktivitas penambangan emas illegal.
Measuring Judicial Accountability in the Algorithmic Era: Juridical Implications of Using Judicial Assistants and Black Box Risks in Constructing Judgment Arguments Saputra, Asbudi Dwi; Irwanto, Hartono Tasir; Nurisnah, Nurisnah
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 2: Oktober 2025 - Maret 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i2.570

Abstract

Although the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has adopted Artificial Intelligence technology for administrative functions, the potential use of Artificial Intelligence as a Judicial Assistant in drafting judgment arguments triggers serious dogmatic concerns. These concerns relate to the degradation of human legal reasoning amidst a national legal vacuum (rechtsvacuüm). This study aims to deconstruct the concept of judicial accountability, which fails to address algorithmic error. Furthermore, this study tests the validity of Black Box-based rulings vis-à-vis the principle of reasoned decision in Law Number 8 of 1981, and formulates a preventive regulatory model. Utilizing a normative-juridical research method and a comparative law approach regarding regulatory frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and China, this study finds that conventional legal doctrines face a liability gap due to the unforeseeable autonomous behavior of Artificial Intelligence. The analysis indicates that reliance on algorithms with opaque characteristics—as demonstrated by the COMPAS case in the United States—fundamentally violates the defendant’s right to explanation. This potentially triggers “the death of standards.” In this condition, judicial discretion is replaced by the rigidity of machine micro-directives. Furthermore, the practice of relinquishment by judges for the sake of administrative efficiency threatens independence and judicial wisdom. This study concludes the urgency of adopting a hybrid regulatory model integrating technical efficiency with the strict User Control principle from the European Ethical Charter. This serves to ensure technology remains a human-supervised servant of justice, not a master dictating rulings.
Reconstruction of the Penal System Based on Triple Vulnerability: Harmonization of Lex Generalis and Lex Specialis in Handling Sexual Violence against Girls with Disabilities Nurisnah, Nurisnah; Saputra, Asbudi Dwi; Muthia, Nuriyah Fara; Dahlan, Muhammad Fitratallah; Rivanie, Syarif Saddam
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 2: Oktober 2025 - Maret 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i2.616

Abstract

The escalation of sexual violence cases against girls with disabilities has reached a crisis stage, exacerbated by the fragmentation of legal regulations operating sectorally. The failure of the judicial system to respond to the complexity of victim vulnerability frequently creates impunity loopholes, perpetuating victimization practices. This research aims to analyze the legal anatomy of “triple vulnerability” and reconstruct the “Integrated Juridical Trident” model as a harmonization solution for the national penal system. Using a normative juridical research method with statute and conceptual approaches, this study examines the synchronization of norms among Law Number 1 of 2023, Law Number 20 of 2025, and related specific laws. The results prove that the intersection of child, female, and person with disabilities statuses constitutes a juridical determinant automatically triggering the application of the absolute rape offense and state accommodation obligations. The constructed trident model positions Law Number 1 of 2023 as the material legality foundation and Law Number 20 of 2025 as the formal legality foundation, synergized horizontally with Law Number 23 of 2002 as the subject determinant, Law Number 8 of 2016 as the procedural rights guarantor, and Law Number 12 of 2022 as the recovery guarantee. The effectiveness of this model is secured by a precision law enforcement strategy, through the validation of proof of equality between witnesses with disabilities and the application of an absolute prohibition on restorative justice. This study concludes that such system integration is necessary to close legal loopholes and guarantee maximum sentencing certainty for perpetrators of these crimes against humanity.
Co-Authors Dahlan, Muhammad Fitratallah Irwanto, Hartono Tasir Muthia, Nuriyah Fara Nurisnah, Nurisnah Syarif Saddam Rivanie