Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review SIGn Jurnal Hukum
Irwanto, Hartono Tasir
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Menegakkan Kesetaraan: Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penumpang Difabel Pada Transportasi Laut Dahlan, Muhammad Fitratallah; Wiranti; Irwanto, Hartono Tasir; Kadir, Nadiah Khaeriah
UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i3.2408

Abstract

judul artikel ini adalah menegakkan kesetaraan: perlindungan hukum bagi penumpang difabel pada transportasi laut, Persoalan hukum terkait pemenuhan hak-hak penyandang disabilitas pada transportasi laut merupakan hal yang sangat penting. Tidak jarang penumpang disabilitas tidak mendapatkan haknya. Oleh karena itu, beberapa dari mereka terkadang mengalami kesulitan hingga terjatuh, diharapkan hak-hak penumpang disabilitas dapat terpenuhi dengan baik. Dengan menerapkan metode kualitatif, artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan dan implementasi hak-hak penumpang disabilitas pada transportasi laut. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa pemenuhan hak-hak penumpang disabilitas khususnya pada transportasi laut belum maksimal. Oleh karena itu, pemerintah Indonesia harus melakukan peninjauan secara komprehensif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada untuk memastikan seluruh pihak yang terlibat dapat bekerja dengan baik untuk pemenuhan hak-hak penumpang disabilitas pada transportasi laut.
Ethics and Law of Personal Data Protection for Smartwatches in the Healthcare Sector Irwanto, Hartono Tasir; Wiranti, Wiranti; Dahlan, Muhammad Fitratallah; Kadir, Nadiah Khaeriah
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 1: April - September 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i1.489

Abstract

The rapid adoption of smartwatches in the healthcare sector presents a fundamental duality between the potential for medical innovation and systemic risks to the right to privacy. This research aims to critically analyze the juridical-ethical gap between the health data governance practices of the smartwatch industry and the normative standards mandated by Law Number 27 of 2022. Using a normative legal research method and a gap analysis approach, this study dissects how industry practices systematically create a transparency deficit and devalue the meaning of informed consent into an illusory agreement. The analysis reveals a diametrical opposition between the regulatory ideal (das sollen), which prioritizes user autonomy, and the reality of industry practices (das sein), which are driven by commercial interests and formalistic compliance. This gap not only exposes users to data exploitation but also challenges the effectiveness of Law Number 27 of 2022 in addressing the complexity of wearable technology. Therefore, this research recommends a paradigm shift from the fragile consent-based model to a rights-based model. Furthermore, it urges the formulation of specific implementing regulations for the health technology sector to bridge the existing gap and build a fair and accountable digital ecosystem.
Menegakkan Kesetaraan: Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penumpang Difabel Pada Transportasi Laut Dahlan, Muhammad Fitratallah; Wiranti; Irwanto, Hartono Tasir; Kadir, Nadiah Khaeriah
UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i3.2408

Abstract

judul artikel ini adalah menegakkan kesetaraan: perlindungan hukum bagi penumpang difabel pada transportasi laut, Persoalan hukum terkait pemenuhan hak-hak penyandang disabilitas pada transportasi laut merupakan hal yang sangat penting. Tidak jarang penumpang disabilitas tidak mendapatkan haknya. Oleh karena itu, beberapa dari mereka terkadang mengalami kesulitan hingga terjatuh, diharapkan hak-hak penumpang disabilitas dapat terpenuhi dengan baik. Dengan menerapkan metode kualitatif, artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan dan implementasi hak-hak penumpang disabilitas pada transportasi laut. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa pemenuhan hak-hak penumpang disabilitas khususnya pada transportasi laut belum maksimal. Oleh karena itu, pemerintah Indonesia harus melakukan peninjauan secara komprehensif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada untuk memastikan seluruh pihak yang terlibat dapat bekerja dengan baik untuk pemenuhan hak-hak penumpang disabilitas pada transportasi laut.
Measuring Judicial Accountability in the Algorithmic Era: Juridical Implications of Using Judicial Assistants and Black Box Risks in Constructing Judgment Arguments Saputra, Asbudi Dwi; Irwanto, Hartono Tasir; Nurisnah, Nurisnah
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 2: Oktober 2025 - Maret 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i2.570

Abstract

Although the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has adopted Artificial Intelligence technology for administrative functions, the potential use of Artificial Intelligence as a Judicial Assistant in drafting judgment arguments triggers serious dogmatic concerns. These concerns relate to the degradation of human legal reasoning amidst a national legal vacuum (rechtsvacuüm). This study aims to deconstruct the concept of judicial accountability, which fails to address algorithmic error. Furthermore, this study tests the validity of Black Box-based rulings vis-à-vis the principle of reasoned decision in Law Number 8 of 1981, and formulates a preventive regulatory model. Utilizing a normative-juridical research method and a comparative law approach regarding regulatory frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and China, this study finds that conventional legal doctrines face a liability gap due to the unforeseeable autonomous behavior of Artificial Intelligence. The analysis indicates that reliance on algorithms with opaque characteristics—as demonstrated by the COMPAS case in the United States—fundamentally violates the defendant’s right to explanation. This potentially triggers “the death of standards.” In this condition, judicial discretion is replaced by the rigidity of machine micro-directives. Furthermore, the practice of relinquishment by judges for the sake of administrative efficiency threatens independence and judicial wisdom. This study concludes the urgency of adopting a hybrid regulatory model integrating technical efficiency with the strict User Control principle from the European Ethical Charter. This serves to ensure technology remains a human-supervised servant of justice, not a master dictating rulings.
Co-Authors Dahlan, Muhammad Fitratallah Kadir, Nadiah Khaeriah Nurisnah, Nurisnah Saputra, Asbudi Dwi Wiranti Wiranti, Wiranti